Page 1 of 1
GENERAL STONEHAM [Closed]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:58 am
by sailorseal
Accused:
GENERAL STONEHAMThe accused are suspected of:
Other: Offensive avatar
Comments:
His avatar is not child appropriate and it would be best for it to be changed
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:01 am
by owenshooter
sailorseal wrote:Accused:
GENERAL STONEHAMThe accused are suspected of:
Other: Offensive avatar
Comments:
His avatar is not child appropriate and it would be best for it to be changed
good luck with that... you are barking up the wrong tree...-0
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:12 am
by mgconstruction
The only thing wrong with his avatar is he needs to slow it down a bit
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:12 am
by Optimus Prime
GENERAL STONEHAM's avatar has been inspected on multiple occasions by several current moderators and has been deemed not to break any forum rules. There is no nudity, no nipples, no anus, and no private parts showing in any of the images. Therefore he will not be forced to remove it.
Regards,
Optimus Prime
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:19 am
by sailorseal
Optimus Prime wrote:GENERAL STONEHAM's avatar has been inspected on multiple occasions by several current moderators and has been deemed not to break any forum rules. There is no nudity, no nipples, no anus, and no private parts showing in any of the images. Therefore he will not be forced to remove it.
Regards,
Optimus Prime
That's a shame but ok thanks
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:21 am
by Optimus Prime
sailorseal wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:GENERAL STONEHAM's avatar has been inspected on multiple occasions by several current moderators and has been deemed not to break any forum rules. There is no nudity, no nipples, no anus, and no private parts showing in any of the images. Therefore he will not be forced to remove it.
Regards,
Optimus Prime
That's a shame but ok thanks
This is not a children's website, and therefore will not cater to the standards of what a child should be exposed to. If a parent or guardian does not want their child to see certain things, they should monitor the child's internet activity more closely.
Regards,
Optimus Prime
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:26 am
by sailorseal
Optimus Prime wrote:sailorseal wrote:Optimus Prime wrote:GENERAL STONEHAM's avatar has been inspected on multiple occasions by several current moderators and has been deemed not to break any forum rules. There is no nudity, no nipples, no anus, and no private parts showing in any of the images. Therefore he will not be forced to remove it.
Regards,
Optimus Prime
That's a shame but ok thanks
This is not a children's website, and therefore will not cater to the standards of what a child should be exposed to. If a parent or guardian does not want their child to see certain things, they should monitor the child's internet activity more closely.
Regards,
Optimus Prime
So according to these standards this would be o.k.?
djt5483
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:31 am
by Optimus Prime
Yes, it isn't breaking any current rules. It is flirting with the line of what is acceptable? Yes, it certainly is, but it is not breaking a rule.
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:34 am
by sailorseal
Optimus Prime wrote:Yes, it isn't breaking any current rules. It is flirting with the line of what is acceptable? Yes, it certainly is, but it is not breaking a rule.
*Sigh*
but thanks OP
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:35 am
by Falkomagno
I like StoneHam avatar.....don't take it away
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:00 pm
by king sam
Next time save yourself a post and do a search before you make a ridiculous claim like this
Settled Claim on same accusationFunny thing is is that you posted on the above cleared report.
You just trying to add to your post count?
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:29 pm
by owenshooter
sailorseal wrote:So according to these standards this would be o.k.?
djt5483
why does every witch hunt on CC have to involve a member of the BpB? i find your use of a large big blue vagina in your sig personally offensive, but i understand others do not, and that it does not violate any CC rules, so i tolerate it. however, the endless attacks on BpB members are becoming ridiculous... thank you prime for sticking up for DJ...-0
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM [Closed]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:44 pm
by djt5483
this aint the first time someones tried to get my avatar changed
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:26 pm
by mgconstruction
owenshooter wrote:sailorseal wrote:So according to these standards this would be o.k.?
djt5483
why does every witch hunt on CC have to involve a member of the BpB? i find your use of a large big
blue vagina in your sig personally offensive, but i understand others do not, and that it does not violate any CC rules, so i tolerate it. however, the endless attacks on BpB members are becoming ridiculous... thank you prime for sticking up for DJ...-0
Smurf Vagina?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM [Closed]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:22 pm
by djt5483
ok i changed my avatar, but only temporarily. gotta support my team
Re: GENERAL STONEHAM [Closed]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sun Apr 05, 2009 4:37 am
by Artimis
LOL, not this again! Always someone has to complain about his avatar, what a weak target.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)