Conquer Club

Accused: SkitteringScales
SkitteringScamp





The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis

Comments: I was just looking for a game to join when i saw those names. i imediately thought of being multis because of the similar names. I checked further and came up with this evidence: out the six games they both played, they played in all of them. They joined on the same day just a few minutes apart. Heres a list of all the Game numbers: 453598 4535986 4543099 4544299 4574673 4574681. I'm only accusing them because it looks very supiscious.
As i was looking at their game chat, i found this:
2009-03-25 20:45:22 - baddestbrute: hello and gl
2009-03-26 17:58:02 - SkitteringScamp: yep, gl
2009-03-26 21:48:37 - SkitteringScales: indeed friends
the other player doesnt mention anything, and yet SkitteringScales says indeed friends. Found in Game 4543099.

First of all, we are related, enjoy risk, and were refered to this website by a inactive member. We joined over the phone, and we play while talking over the phone, and since its all doubles I can see no reason why that would be an issue.

Accused:SkitteringScamp & SkitteringScales

SkitteringScamp
SkitteringScales


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis



Game number(s):

Game 4574681
Game 4574673
Game 4544299
Game 4543099
Game 4535986
Game 4535985


Comments: the only games they play are dubs and with each other
the names are almost the same and they booth come in to chat at the same time
22:03:13 ‹SkitteringScamp› no,we are not multies
30/03/2009 22:03:23 ‹SkitteringScamp› cousins that enjoy risk

Allright, i can live with that. But why the similar names? When i saw those names, i just thought you were a multi. But im a nice guy. I forgive you and your cousin for making that accusation.

I would say that they are multis.

Game http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4574673

All they do is play doubles with each other. Joined the same day. Have similar usernames. They can say what they want in the chat, but that doesn't make it true.

Actually it does. We play doubles with each other, where is the crime in that? We have only played 6 games and we are without premium, so It makes sense that we would play together since we have enjoyed playing risk together for the last 7 years. Still, I remain unclear on how that is illegal. Joining the same day? That is an issue for you? is it cheating if you join with a friend near the same time and play with that friend? I think not. When having friends on websites becomes a threat to the system you are running, please feel free to ban us, but in till that time I suggest you reevaluate what it means to have friends on and off the web, and combining the two.

I just wanted to say the names made me snort pepsi out. (either the dumbest or smartest multi names ever, but if they are playing doubles, who cares?)

*in before the "cleared".

i saw them before, but didn't make a thread cuz i honestly don't think theyre multis...i mean, all they do is play dubs. and i always did wonder, how do you know if two accounts are not just siblings playing on the same computer or playing on two diff computers in the same household? ip address doesn't tell you that.

maybe a noted would be appropriate here. it wouldn't be fair to ban them from the site or ban them from playing each other just cuz they play dubs together

Thank you Darth Blood.
If you feel the need to monitor our games when we play against each other (which may never happen), please do, we have nothing to hide.

this issue was brought to my attention but I see it is already posted. I glanced real fast and I can already see the outcome of this verdict.

SkitteringScamp wrote:First of all, we are related, enjoy risk, and were refered to this website by a inactive member. We joined over the phone, and we play while talking over the phone, and since its all doubles I can see no reason why that would be an issue.

was the inactive player name Max, Manimal, or Rammed ?

They joined within a day of each other : \

But no multis should be that obvious unless they're Max, Ramned or manimal...

Suspects:
SkitteringScales
SkitteringScamp

Verdict: Cleared of multiple accounts.

Fireside Poet wrote:Suspects:
SkitteringScales
SkitteringScamp

Verdict: Cleared of multiple accounts.

I knew it. Only looked at it for 15 seconds.

Thank you, and no the inactive was none of those people.