Conquer Club

Accused:

Owenator
Pat


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy



Game number(s):

4323746
4323744


Comments:
I've tried to join a game with Pat but i was on his foe's list even though we have never played together. So i pm him and here's what he'd answered to me:

Re: Hi
Sent: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:26 pm
by BoomBoomBoom

Ok Owen. I understand now...
Re: Hi
Sent: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:51 am
by Pat

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4323746
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=4323744

i don't need to play you to put you on my foe list, Owen's opinion of you is good enough.
if you care enough, you can tell Owen to send me a msg to take you off my foe list.

cheers.
Hi
Sent: Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:33 am
by BoomBoomBoom

Could u tell me why i'm on ur foe.We've never played together...


I went to see the chat of those 2 games but I can only read this

2009-02-23 14:17:20 - The Mantis: gl all
2009-03-05 10:40:31 - Gilly754: hes gone owen


I think that all the other players have placed me on their foe's list so that I can't read the conspiracy they were conducting against me.
And i don't believe that a player place another player on his foe's list without ever having played with him. That's why i think Owenator and Pat are the same player.

BoomBoomBoom wrote:I think that all the other players have placed me on their foe's list so that I can't read the conspiracy they were conducting against me.

Nice theory, but you've got one little thing confused. You cannot read the posts of players who you have placed on your foe list. You will still be able to read the posts of people who have you as a 'foe'. So, unless they've conspired against you by placing themselves on your foe list (which is impossible), you're just blowing steam here.

You're a total lunatic.

Rocket.

Standard blurb will be said to you BoomBoomBam on this one.
Foe and rate them accordingly. A player does not have to partake in a game to foe someone.

I'm sure you both didn't 100% understand everything on the forums the first time you visited, and there's probably more weird shit to understand nowadays, especially if you're not very forum savvy, so lay off the guy.

Boom, the foe list only works so that, if you foe'd him, you won't see his words. Him foe listing you will not affect it, so you'd still see it. And they're allowed to foe list for whatever reason they so choose.

Kotaro wrote:I'm sure you both didn't 100% understand everything on the forums the first time you visited, and there's probably more weird shit to understand nowadays, especially if you're not very forum savvy, so lay off the guy.

Boom, the foe list only works so that, if you foe'd him, you won't see his words. Him foe listing you will not affect it, so you'd still see it. And they're allowed to foe list for whatever reason they so choose.

somehow i agree with Kot... if i didnt know how it worked i would have been thinking cheaters too... and actually for owenater to unite them all against himn and owenater to ultimately win both games... sucked...

Personally, I believe that all players who bombed the freemium were wrong.
Points are points, they can be regained as easily as they as lost eliminating the low man because you lose more points to him is wrong.
The point of this game to to eliminate ALL opposing color(s), not ranks.
I think this would warrant a strong warning much like the recent anti-farming rules.

funny how someone who's supposedly a newer player on CC knows how to submit an investigation for violation of rules. I can't wait for them to bust YOU for being a multi.

Wed Dec 24, 2008 4:56 am

Not that new

owenator wrote:funny how someone who's supposedly a newer player on CC knows how to submit an investigation for violation of rules. I can't wait for them to bust YOU for being a multi.

80 games on a free account is new? and submitting something correctly is not that hard, there is a thread on how to do it and a template.
This might come to a surprise to you, but.....There are some people who actually read the rules and regulations when they join something.

I have looked through the games and there is nothing that owenator seems to have done to imply a secret diplomacy. He wanted BoomBoomBoom eliminated for fear that BoomBoomBoom was a multi and stated so in chat.

owenator wrote:funny how someone who's supposedly a newer player on CC knows how to submit an investigation for violation of rules. I can't wait for them to bust YOU for being a multi.

BoomBoomBoom is Cleared of being a multi.

lancehoch wrote:I have looked through the games and there is nothing that owenator seems to have done to imply a secret diplomacy. He wanted BoomBoomBoom eliminated for fear that BoomBoomBoom was a multi and stated so in chat.

owenator wrote:funny how someone who's supposedly a newer player on CC knows how to submit an investigation for violation of rules. I can't wait for them to bust YOU for being a multi.

BoomBoomBoom is Cleared of being a multi.

BoomBoomBoom, wasn't cleared on being a douchebag.

Game 4107985 Well I don't know if he's a multi or not but he's on my foe list because he was clearly switching accounts while playing this game. I saw both of them logging on and off by viewing their profiles during their go. It was blatenly obvious.

King_Herpes wrote:Game 4107985 Well I don't know if he's a multi or not but he's on my foe list because he was clearly switching accounts while playing this game. I saw both of them logging on and off by viewing their profiles during their go. It was blatenly obvious.

CC_lover was already busted...maybe thats what you saw.

Foed

i've been on this site for almost 3 years.
not once have i made a new or second account.
i play alot of games with Owen because i like Feudal (since they changed the classic)
and Owen's games attract higher ranked players.
i hate playing douche bags, Boomboomboom was called a douche bag by a guy i like to play with.
nuff incentive,
Pat