d1g1t4l (possible multi) [Busted +1]
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:23 amAccused:
d1g1t4l
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Game number(s):
Game 4129231 3rd game played under this account
Game 4129355 4th game played under this account
Game 4162714 my game with him
Comments:
I recently had a teams games against this individual (Game 4162714) where he benefited from the lackluster performance of a Captain playing like a cook. In that game my partner and I suspected fowl play and asked it to be looked at in a report I made in this forum. (Found Here !)
In that thread d1g1t4l took great offense to his name being searched for the accusation of a multiple account. I'm not sure if it was just checked with the names I provided in that thread, but if it was then I would like his name to be revisited with any other possible accounts out there and here is why.
d1g1t4l
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:12 am
The 3rd game this profile has ever played has this game chat & log:
Quite possibly yes he could have read the last paragraph on the "assaulting your enemies part" of the taking a turn tab in the instructions that would give him the insight of collecting cards from the elimination of opponents but I think unlikely.
Most definitely unlikely that he picked up the term "suicide of troops" anywhere in his first few days on this site.
The 4th game this profile has ever played has this game chat & log:
(I broke this one up to just his chat references cause its quite large)
Somehow knows in depth tactical data on troop collection associated with # of players and map size from being on the site for 5 days.
Once again inner workings of the term "suiciding" and in depth tactical knowledge of the game for a "new player"
Do I even need to go in the fact that a player with 5 days of experience, barely any fog of war experience under his belt should have the know how of the tactical knowledge you get from reading the log on the game chat to understand someones strength on a fow game?
(his first foggy game is here , he had taken 8 turns in foggy conditions at this time when he made this comment)
Plus with 5 days of experience who really dives into checking your opponents games they are in to see what kind of player they are?
He had completed 2 games and rated 3 players at the time of this chat. Not sure but think a beginner with that little experience wouldnt be this concerned with this.
Anyway I think I made my point.
Because of his chat, actions, and nerves from the previous thread I think he deserves a check with all accounts. If this was already done then sorry I wasted your time, but I believe I validated my point on to why this character smells fishy.
Thanks
King Sam
d1g1t4l
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Game number(s):
Game 4129231 3rd game played under this account
Game 4129355 4th game played under this account
Game 4162714 my game with him
Comments:
I recently had a teams games against this individual (Game 4162714) where he benefited from the lackluster performance of a Captain playing like a cook. In that game my partner and I suspected fowl play and asked it to be looked at in a report I made in this forum. (Found Here !)
In that thread d1g1t4l took great offense to his name being searched for the accusation of a multiple account. I'm not sure if it was just checked with the names I provided in that thread, but if it was then I would like his name to be revisited with any other possible accounts out there and here is why.
d1g1t4l
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:12 am
The 3rd game this profile has ever played has this game chat & log:
Game Log & Chat wrote:2009-01-27 01:16:14 - Game has been initialized
2009-02-02 17:21:55 - d1g1t4l: nice suicide red ...
2009-02-04 16:32:08 - Elfsun: I thought suicide was the in thing these days
2009-02-04 16:33:47 - d1g1t4l: haha ....yeah arent you in my other game on this map? well i thought someone would have taken him out but he lucked out.
2009-02-04 20:36:05 - Elfsun: I have him bleating in another game I have with him as well
2009-02-04 20:36:24 - Elfsun: Do you get someones cards if you kill them?
2009-02-06 16:48:07 - d1g1t4l: yes you do
2009-02-09 01:49:58 - d1g1t4l: blue, unless we work together, green will win in the next two rounds.
Quite possibly yes he could have read the last paragraph on the "assaulting your enemies part" of the taking a turn tab in the instructions that would give him the insight of collecting cards from the elimination of opponents but I think unlikely.
Most definitely unlikely that he picked up the term "suicide of troops" anywhere in his first few days on this site.
The 4th game this profile has ever played has this game chat & log:
(I broke this one up to just his chat references cause its quite large)
Game Log & Chat wrote:2009-01-27 01:22:05 - Game has been initialized
2009-02-02 17:56:01 - d1g1t4l: 11 is not that much in a map this large with this many players...
Somehow knows in depth tactical data on troop collection associated with # of players and map size from being on the site for 5 days.
Game Log & Chat wrote:2009-02-03 12:47:59 - d1g1t4l: the only thing that made it easy for me was that you suicided yourself... of course i am going to take you out. red put himself in a better position by taking you down. he made you weaker while getting out of my way.
Once again inner workings of the term "suiciding" and in depth tactical knowledge of the game for a "new player"
Game Log & Chat wrote:2009-02-03 18:34:01 - d1g1t4l: in fog of war games you can still read the game log... youre still 0 for 3. shut up, get out of the game
Do I even need to go in the fact that a player with 5 days of experience, barely any fog of war experience under his belt should have the know how of the tactical knowledge you get from reading the log on the game chat to understand someones strength on a fow game?
(his first foggy game is here , he had taken 8 turns in foggy conditions at this time when he made this comment)
Plus with 5 days of experience who really dives into checking your opponents games they are in to see what kind of player they are?
Game Log & Chat wrote:2009-02-03 18:41:12 - d1g1t4l: im pretty sure everyone is going to tag you with a sore loser after this ... and im sure youre goin gto give us all 1's, which further proves the point of you bein a sore loser
He had completed 2 games and rated 3 players at the time of this chat. Not sure but think a beginner with that little experience wouldnt be this concerned with this.
Anyway I think I made my point.
Because of his chat, actions, and nerves from the previous thread I think he deserves a check with all accounts. If this was already done then sorry I wasted your time, but I believe I validated my point on to why this character smells fishy.
Thanks
King Sam
Thanks Fireside, knew this guy was fishy