Page 1 of 1

Accused multi: Cameleon.C [busted]

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:45 pm
by owenator
Cameleon.C

Accused:

Cameleon.C


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 3932756
Game 4216497
Game 4198487




Comments: Joins on December. 30th, 2008 8:21am, then immediately gets a private invite to the above mentioned game, 6 minutes later? The second and third game provided is a reference to two 6 player Feudal games. One is sequential, the other is freestyle. Even after 55 games, it's very difficult to be able to play your first 6 player game and come out as the winner. Game: 4216497 game log shows him understanding a strategy that is used by players with extensive experience in this type of map. He has acquired 4 territories and simply bombards a neutral territory for an easy card. This I find to be extremely suspicious, being his first ever sequential game.

Re: Accused multi: Cameleon.C

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:31 am
by Humrlmo
The private game is what I find very suspicious!
Also, going from moving out of Castle territory in first few Feudal games to just bombarding. That is something he could have learned, but something still seems off!

Added:
See also Game 4063098. 1st ever AoR2 game & either had a great coach in Barako or is a multi since almost all first-timers on it don't understand how the bonus works.
Not to brag, but myself & gcwca_4_life play that map A LOT, and got beat like it was by someone with much experience!

Re: Accused multi: Cameleon.C

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:22 am
by king achilles
Cameleon.C is busted with CheatersCB.

Re: Accused multi: Cameleon.C [busted]

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 4:46 pm
by owenator
Thanks for the work/effort king achilles.

Re: Accused multi: Cameleon.C [busted]

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:01 pm
by owenshooter
owenator wrote:Thanks for the work/effort king achilles.

although, it really wasn't needed... rarely, if ever, is an owen wrong... word...-0

Re: Accused multi: Cameleon.C [busted]

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:41 pm
by owenator
owenshooter wrote:
owenator wrote:Thanks for the work/effort king achilles.

although, it really wasn't needed... rarely, if ever, is an owen wrong... word...-0


True. Though, credit was deserved. I've been known to be harsh on the guys (lance, king, twill) in the past. It was time that I showed some kind of gratitude. And I agree, RARELY is an owen ever wrong. Amen.