Conquer Club

Posted: **Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:24 am**

Accused:

BanMungalow

The accused is accused/suspected of:

Being a Multi
Posting almost 56 pages of spam on my wall

Game number(s):

Game 4236972

Comments:

I'm basing this accusation on the username...
BanMungalow also beat a seasoned freestyle Captain in Game 4236972
Seriously spammed me (I'm not too bothered about this; I thought that it may be of interest)

Posted: **Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:36 am**

Posted: **Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:41 am**

Heehee sorry Manb for spamming your wall but thanks for the reports- you did introduce e to this game and now your trying to get rid of me? :shock:

The name is a joke and the fact that i beat a captian,ever heard of beginners luck, ill see you at work but seriously what is the point?

Posted: **Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:19 pm**

might want to check multiply5 as well

Posted: **Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:53 pm**

Posted: **Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:49 pm**

BanMungalow wrote:Heehee sorry Manb for spamming your wall but thanks for the reports- you did introduce e to this game and now your trying to get rid of me? ill see you at work but seriously what is the point?

now ManB has to watch his back walking through the cubicles?!! holy mackeral!!! i hope it is some sort of regular office and not a post office!!! this could get messy!!! imagine what you would do if a co-worker got you tossed from CC?!!! ha!!!-0

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:21 am**

owenshooter wrote:
BanMungalow wrote:Heehee sorry Manb for spamming your wall but thanks for the reports- you did introduce e to this game and now your trying to get rid of me? ill see you at work but seriously what is the point?

now ManB has to watch his back walking through the cubicles?!! holy mackeral!!! i hope it is some sort of regular office and not a post office!!! this could get messy!!! imagine what you would do if a co-worker got you tossed from CC?!!! ha!!!-0

BanMungalow explained to me yesterday that "you did introduce e to this game" is directed and Multiply5 and I. Technically Multiply5 persuaded BanMungalow to create an account. Don't worry about it.
My respect for this site will seriously drop if they ban a friend of mine due to a joke (at the username) and a mistake.

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:17 am**

ManBungalow wrote:My respect for this site will seriously drop if they ban a friend of mine due to a joke (at the username) and a mistake.

wait, didn't you start this thread?!!! ha!!! the irony!!! what did the site have to do with it?!! it was all you!!!! ha!!!!-0

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:26 am**

Yes, I get the feeling ManBungalow is the person he is looking for himself!

In before the bust (of ManBungalow).

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:38 am**

who typed in "cleared" in the heading? I dont see a mod response.

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:03 am**

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:who typed in "cleared" in the heading? I dont see a mod response.

not a mod...-0

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:11 pm**

owenshooter wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:who typed in "cleared" in the heading? I dont see a mod response.

not a mod...-0

Probably ManB who did it, in order to cover up his multi.

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:16 pm**

obliterationX wrote:Yes, I get the feeling ManBungalow is the person he is looking for himself!

In before the bust (of ManBungalow).

Thanks, that post made my day.

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:36 pm**

ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Posted: **Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:39 pm**

lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:39 am**

ManBungalow wrote:
lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

how can a multi be settled personally?

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:44 am**

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

how can a multi be settled personally?

This is not a multi, rather an office practical joke gone a bit far maybe?

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:57 pm**

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

how can a multi be settled personally?

Exactly.

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:14 pm**

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

how can a multi be settled personally?

I've seen both guys sign on which, in my mind, settles the matter.

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:51 pm**

ManBungalow wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

how can a multi be settled personally?

I've seen both guys sign on which, in my mind, settles the matter.

Yes, other than the fact that it goes against rule #1 and the agreement you made when you signed up for an account.

"You" meaning people in general, and not specifically you.

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:58 pm**

ManBungalow wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

how can a multi be settled personally?

I've seen both guys sign on which, in my mind, settles the matter.

This post stinks of desperateness (sp?) to get the topic closed & the spotlight off ManB in my opinion.

Posted: **Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:43 pm**

owenshooter wrote:now ManB has to watch his back walking through the cubicles?!!\

I just feel bad that he works in cubicles, let them go...

Posted: **Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:35 am**

sailorseal wrote:
owenshooter wrote:now ManB has to watch his back walking through the cubicles?!!\

I just feel bad that he works in cubicles, let them go...

cubicles vs bunks on a ship...ill take the cubicles

Posted: **Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:37 am**

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
sailorseal wrote:
owenshooter wrote:now ManB has to watch his back walking through the cubicles?!!\

I just feel bad that he works in cubicles, let them go...

cubicles vs bunks on a ship...ill take the cubicles

Posted: **Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:58 pm**

obliterationX wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
ManBungalow wrote:
lancehoch wrote:ManB, please do not keep editing the subject line of the thread. This is being investigated.

Sorry

I just wanted it closed because this has been settled personally.

how can a multi be settled personally?

I've seen both guys sign on which, in my mind, settles the matter.

This post stinks of desperateness (sp?) to get the topic closed & the spotlight off ManB in my opinion.

This post stinks of desperation to drop ManB into something he's not directly involved in....

Conquer Club

BanMungalow [busted]

BanMungalow [busted]

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow [Cleared]

Re: BanMungalow [Cleared]

Re: BanMungalow [Cleared]

Re: BanMungalow [Cleared]

Re: BanMungalow [Cleared]

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow

Re: BanMungalow