Page 1 of 1

aintnosaint, naktay01 [closed]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:30 pm
by mbohn2
Game 87747

naktay01 started game by pooling all armies in one spot, I had SA and aintnosaint had Aus. Aint had 20 armies in India and China I had 10 in N Africa. Nak had 8 in ukraine received 4 on the draw and promptly suiced EVERY army into me, leaving himself with only 1 army on each of his territories in round 2 of the game. Not even attempting to stay alive or weaken the other player. If this is not collusion then there has NEVER been any on conquer club.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:42 pm
by naktay01
yep i sure did. but what he's not telling you is that he also had all of africa, and s. america. his 10 armies were sitting on n africa i deployed my guys from ukrain down to n africa. which my armies won and left me with 4 armies he had 1 in brazil so to stop him from getting a card i attacked brazil. the other armies i lost were from tring to get great britan from iceland lost 6 armies to 1 guy.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:00 pm
by thejackofhearts
he's just complaining cause he's a sore loser, you should have just ignored him.

g#87747

PostPosted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:58 pm
by aintnosaint
I am not one for negative feedback or arguments. But my name has been mentioned as a multi by mbohn2. In a 3 player pick-up game, I knew neither of the other players. Naktay01 was sandwiched, and I had more on his rear than mbohn2 had on his front...nuf said about the game.

I also noticed that Naktay01 had a 39-0 approval rating before this game. mbohn2 should apologize for, and/or remove the one negative he placed against naktay01.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:56 pm
by lackattack
Well there is no indication that naktay01 and aintnosaint are multis, and no outstanding feedback complaints, so I'm marking this case closed.