Page 1 of 1

Zat and Buddhabelly - [cleared and noted]

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:11 am
by killukbrisk
Accused:

zat
Buddhabelly



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis or
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 4072807
Game 1935792
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]



Comments:
Either these two guys are multis or they are in a secret alliance as when they each had a chance to break the others areas without leaving themselves exposed, yet rather than doing that they have both attacked me. When I looked back in their history together, I found the game listed above, which had Zat winning in 1.5 rounds, not potentially unusual, apart from the fact that it was a Freestyle game and there is a minute between each of their moves, and also Buddhabelly commits suicide straight away, even though he has played this map loads.

If these guys aren't multis, there is something sus about them, :?

Re: Zat and Buddhabelly - Multi

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:14 am
by Joodoo
secret alliance-maybe
multis-unlikely because usually a multi would not purchase two premiums

Re: Zat and Buddhabelly - Multi

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:19 am
by SirSebstar
eh, you do know thay have played about 6000 games between the two of them?!. They have only played 7 games together, including yours.
That makes a poor case for multi's. Also a secret alliance is really hard to prove. The fact that they play a lot but have that kind of rank suggests they are not really into winning as much as some other fellow players on this site. There is really nothing to suggest they have an alliance. If I were concentrating on one piece of the board, and someone else on the other side, then the guy in the middle would always get screwed. I do not need any alliace for that.
Just my thoughts though

Re: Zat and Buddhabelly - Multi

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:20 am
by SirSebstar
Joodoo wrote:secret alliance-maybe
multis-unlikely because usually a multi would not purchase two premiums

I have known a few who did. sigh

Re: Zat and Buddhabelly - Multi

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:13 pm
by sailorseal
I also say secret alliance

Re: Zat and Buddhabelly - Multi

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:11 am
by gcwca_4_life
Joodoo wrote:secret alliance-maybe
multis-unlikely because usually a multi would not purchase two premiums


Shall we bring up the *manimal files?
He had many accounts with premium at once. And once he got busted he got premium again, and made more accounts.


I wouldn't say it's not possible, but aren't those speed games? or what? How is it possible for a multi to play a speed game with both accounts?

Just a bit curious.
Unless of course he has 2 computer right beside each other.
Because wouldn't a speed game drop if your not active for 5 minutes? ;)

Re: Zat and Buddhabelly - Multi

PostPosted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:20 am
by king achilles
zat and buddhabelly are cleared of being multis with each other. As for a possible secret alliance, they may be gathering cards when they chose to assault you and probably preparing on who could eliminate you first to get whatever cards you already have. This can be seen as a matter of difference in gameplay.