Page 1 of 1

NW.Traveler [cleared]

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:08 pm
by wannaseemytreat
Accused:

NW.Traveler
rainbowsix1963
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis/
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 4012514
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]



Comments:i have reported these 2 because it looks to me that they had secret diplomatic goings on which stopped me from winning and becoming chief cook and bottle washer. traveler kept me busy in new england while rainbow six went off and won it behind my back. dispicable thats what i say.

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:12 pm
by king sam
dude are you going to report someone every time you lose?

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:19 pm
by wannaseemytreat
last one, promise

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 2:58 pm
by dezzy26
this seems to me this a revenge report as nw.traveler reported you.
it was the same game number
also in the chat he accused you of of secret alliance

reckon hunters wont have much to do here :roll:

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:00 pm
by The Neon Peon
Earlier on in that game, you and one of the members only attacked the other player, who was by far weaker. Why did you think he attacked you back and not the strong one? You were suiciding into him all game and then you expect him to help you against the strong player?

Yes, I do watch random games at times...

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:21 pm
by sailorseal
Is it possible to give this guy a cheating and abuse ban? he is reporting everyone

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:37 pm
by wannaseemytreat
sailorseal wrote:Is it possible to give this guy a cheating and abuse ban? he is reporting everyone


what so im not allowed to use the forums for what they were designed for

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:39 pm
by sailorseal
wannaseemytreat wrote:
sailorseal wrote:Is it possible to give this guy a cheating and abuse ban? he is reporting everyone


what so im not allowed to use the forums for what they were designed for


No so you will stop spamming this forum, go spam flame wars

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:45 pm
by wannaseemytreat
[quote="The Neon Peon"]Earlier on in that game, you and one of the members only attacked the other player, who was by far weaker.


oh! i see, now we cant attack weaker players. I wish I'd known sooner.

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:46 pm
by wannaseemytreat
sailorseal wrote:
wannaseemytreat wrote:
sailorseal wrote:Is it possible to give this guy a cheating and abuse ban? he is reporting everyone


what so im not allowed to use the forums for what they were designed for


No so you will stop spamming this forum, go spam flame wars


so who decides its spam? you? not likely

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:14 pm
by sailorseal
I don't but a mod might agree

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:50 pm
by wannaseemytreat
sailorseal wrote:I don't but a mod might agree


and you my friend are not a moderator. so stop trying to be one

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:53 pm
by sailorseal
What makes you say I am trying to be one?

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:06 pm
by The Neon Peon
wannaseemytreat wrote:oh! i see, now we cant attack weaker players. I wish I'd known sooner.

Right on! (If that statement of yours had not been said with sarcasm)

Attacking the weaker player is one of the dumbest moves in a game and is considered suicide. It is also the main reason there are so many low ranks.

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:12 am
by king achilles
I have checked NW.Traveler and rainbowsix1963 and they are not multi accounts with each other. Also, this is their first game played together so far. We would need more than one game of strong evidence of malicious plays involving the same players to warrant a block.

Re: NW.Traveler

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:04 pm
by wannaseemytreat
The Neon Peon wrote:
wannaseemytreat wrote:oh! i see, now we cant attack weaker players. I wish I'd known sooner.

Right on! (If that statement of yours had not been said with sarcasm)

Attacking the weaker player is one of the dumbest moves in a game and is considered suicide. It is also the main reason there are so many low ranks.


i can see where your coming from however, the problem is that not everyone plays by the rules especially unwritten ones.