Page 1 of 1

c2los666 [Busted]

PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:30 pm
by samuelc812
Accused:

c2los666

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=74591&p=1789544#p1789544

Comments:
It's Stephen Wayne :P

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:34 pm
by c2los666
samuelc812 wrote:need i go on :)

yeah

c2los666

PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:35 pm
by e_i_pi
Accused:

c2los666


The accused are suspected of:

Being a Banned Player


Total contribution to the site so far:

0 games
6 posts in The Firing of Wicked
1 post in C&A Thread
Good for a laugh... a website worth a whopping $518.30 - nice to see a good 3 months work has amounted to a total value of $43 a week. Maybe you'll be able to afford that crack pipe you were hoping to get for Christmas


Comments:

Yet another attempt by the pariah kiddy to get back into the playground with their former playmates
Hint: Next time, don't be a douche

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:38 pm
by c2los666
Im not banned yet and did you dont see the other thread about me?

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:11 am
by DaGip
c2los666 wrote:
samuelc812 wrote:need i go on :)

yeah

Go with yo bad self...

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:13 am
by DaGip
This thread should be merged...

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:19 am
by InkL0sed
Clearly not wicked...

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:25 am
by DaGip
I think it was just a little kid that was spamming up the forum, that's all...no way that was wicked.

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:31 am
by samuelc812
Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user ;)

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 am
by DaGip
samuelc812 wrote:Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user ;)


It might be a little punk friend of a previously banned user and the previously banned user told the punk friend how to really get at some people on the forums, just for a little punk laugh. That wouldn't be a multi, but more "trollish" and is dignified a "time out" and not a permaban from the site.

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:46 am
by Megadeth666
:shock: mmmm, could it be someone that received a ban recently? :roll:

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:54 am
by e_i_pi
Megadeth666 wrote::shock: mmmm, could it be someone that received a ban recently? :roll:

I don't see them playing any games against ?'s

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:57 pm
by hwhrhett
DaGip wrote:
samuelc812 wrote:Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user ;)


It might be a little punk friend of a previously banned user and the previously banned user told the punk friend how to really get at some people on the forums, just for a little punk laugh. That wouldn't be a multi, but more "trollish" and is dignified a "time out" and not a permaban from the site.



dignified?

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:13 pm
by lancehoch
Merged the two threads.

Re: c2los666

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:04 pm
by Fireside Poet
Suspect:
c2los666

Verdict: Busted for multiple accounts along with Stephen Wayne.