Page 1 of 1
dragonwarrior7/professorkimball same person [closed]
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:26 pmby argyll72
These are suspected Multis
Suspect users: dragonwarrior7/professorkimball
Game number:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=75575
Game number:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=75574
Game number:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=75573
Comments: First of all look at there previous games played. They are in every game with each other. I wouldn't have noticed if I wasn't in three games with them. In the one game 75575 I had NA, SA, AF, EU and I end up loosing. Both users broke me and in the three games. professorkimball won all three games. The users never attack each other unless it' to take a continent. When I confronted them they claimed to be a father/son. But I'm not so sure. Even if they are father/son they did not declare an alliance in the game chat, which they had. So either way there is at least on rule being broken. Thank you for looking into this matter.
<argyll72>
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:35 pmby AK_iceman
Sorry to say this, but these 2 players have already been accused TWICE of being multis and have been cleared both times.
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:36 pmby lackattack
They've been accused 2 other times in the forum and a few times via email. Enough is enough! I've blocked them from playing together in the future. Even if they are father and son, they obviously don't play fair.
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:40 pmby argyll72
so i'm out the 58 points then?
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:51 pmby lackattack
suck it up, cupcake
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:55 pmby argyll72
It was a simple question. I wasn't whining. I didn't know what procedure was. If a person uses two accounts and are found to be cheating does the other person get the points back or is it left as is? Thank you for answering my question.
respectfully
argyll72
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:58 pmby wicked
lackattack wrote:suck it up, cupcake
grr... MY SAYING!
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:15 pmby lackattack
We don't do point reversals. It's asking for trouble, plus it's extra work.
Posted:
Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:17 pmby argyll72
Thank you.
Posted:
Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:24 amby lackattack
Update: I worked out a deal with them, they can continue to play together as long as - whenever they play as opponents - they post a warning in the game chat that. If people have a problem with that, there is always negative feedback.
Posted:
Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:35 amby Dlakavi
lol, it is "his son" and he is still learning,
"Son" has 300 points and the father has 1500.
And the "son" plays just fine until its only him and his "daddy" in the game.
Yeah right.
How much proof do You need
Posted:
Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:41 amby ZawBanjito
The father is a bum! My dad taught me Risk and he let me win at least every now and again. That's just good Freudianism.
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:57 amby gavin_sidhu
lackattack wrote:Update: I worked out a deal with them, they can continue to play together as long as - whenever they play as opponents - they post a warning in the game chat that. If people have a problem with that, there is always negative feedback.
Thats not very helpful for the person who gets burned points, theyre obviously cheating as Dlakavi pointed out. I preferred your first resolution.
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:10 pmby lackattack
Dlakavi wrote:lol, it is "his son" and he is still learning,
"Son" has 300 points and the father has 1500.
And the "son" plays just fine until its only him and his "daddy" in the game.
Yeah right.
How much proof do You need
Gee I didn't realize that. In fact in all the standard games where it was just the two of them left, "father" won 36 times and "son" won 2 times. Very sketchy.
In light of this new evidence, I'm re-instating the block.