Page 1 of 1

Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:35 pm
by hwhrhett
Accused:

King_Herpes
Queen_Gonorrhea
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

they find doubles games on strange maps with low ranked players, trick someone else clueless into joining using an auto-join link through pm, and then join the game immediately as team #2 in order to force them into a game they are unfamiliar with, and an assumed easy win.




Game number(s):

Game 3482368
Game 3469529




Comments:

in both of these games the players were clueless as to how they got into the game, and in this thread here a player from 3482368 is in the cheating and abuse forum claiming he recieved a pm from king_herpes and was fooled into joining the game:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=67252&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:05 am
by Mr Changsha
Well done on following this up.

I am intruiged to see how King Herpes will justify this.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:47 am
by Jeff Hardy
farming is not a crime

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:16 am
by nagerous
Jeff Hardy wrote:farming is not a crime


Tricking people into joining games through auto-link PMs is though, I believe. Firth4eva got done for this a while back.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:25 am
by Jeff Hardy
nagerous wrote:
Jeff Hardy wrote:farming is not a crime


Tricking people into joining games through auto-link PMs is though, I believe. Firth4eva got done for this a while back.


oh sorry, i missed the point...

thats different i thought they were being accused for asking people to join

but what proof do we have that they send auto-join links via pm?

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:18 am
by hwhrhett
Jeff Hardy wrote:
nagerous wrote:
Jeff Hardy wrote:farming is not a crime


Tricking people into joining games through auto-link PMs is though, I believe. Firth4eva got done for this a while back.


oh sorry, i missed the point...

thats different i thought they were being accused for asking people to join

but what proof do we have that they send auto-join links via pm?



2 people that ended up in games that they have no idea how they got in them. just clicked on a link that looked like it was to an 'article' and were auto-joined

EDIT: and those are just the two people that had common sense to say something about it in chat, ill bet the other games with those 2 are the same way.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:24 am
by cena-rules
auto link

t-o-m got a weeks forum ban for doing it in chat and the forums

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 5:00 pm
by niMic
It continuously amazes me how far some people are willing to go to get points. It's like getting the highest ranking possible is what their life is all about.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 10:11 pm
by motionstop
i'm rather against farming in general, but this stoops to a new low.

duping new recruits and seasoned players into joining a game is cheap and cowardly. not to mention, unethical.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:24 am
by king achilles
We need the whole messages or links that were sent to these players so we can have the actual proof before we can determine the case. For now this is noted.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:08 am
by hwhrhett
king achilles wrote:We need the whole messages or links that were sent to these players so we can have the actual proof before we can determine the case. For now this is noted.



really? ?? wow. so since they apologized and nobody will post a pm then it wont be pursued?

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:18 am
by SirSebstar
no crime reported, no proof given, makes a sound judgement kinda hard, don't you think?

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:31 am
by hwhrhett
SirSebstar wrote:no crime reported, no proof given, makes a sound judgement kinda hard, don't you think?



1. i reported the crime
2. there are two people that say in the chat that they did NOT join the game. and an admission of guilt and an apology for tricking them.


are apologies all it takes?? when did this become policy?

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:00 pm
by lancehoch
No, the problem is that the PMs are not posted here.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:04 pm
by hwhrhett
lancehoch wrote:No, the problem is that the PMs are not posted here.


thats shitty. oh well.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:34 pm
by Bones2484
lancehoch wrote:No, the problem is that the PMs are not posted here.


That's a horrible cop out.

1. The new player made a thread stating he was sent a hidden link to a game he didn't want to play.
2. He tried to post the PM, but does not have enough internet knowledge on how to do so (even when given directions).
3. King apologized for tricking said player.

How much more proof is needed? There's a reported abuse, and an admission of guilt on said report.

Nice to know that simply apologizing will let you get away with deceit. Good standard to set here.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:47 pm
by Zemljanin
lancehoch wrote:No, the problem is that the PMs are not posted here.

And I guess mailboxes are taboo, so you can't check directly?

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:23 pm
by lancehoch
The admin have repeatedly stated that they do not and will not check people's inboxes.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:16 pm
by Zemljanin
lancehoch wrote:The admin have repeatedly stated that they do not and will not check people's inboxes.

Really? Well, my (and not only mine) inbox was not only checked - but even EDITED! I don't need to explain, since everybody remembers it very well...

(I'm not blaming YOU, lancehoch. But you're a spokesman - spokesmen do get a short end, sometimes...)

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:21 pm
by Bones2484
After one of the games that Herpes duped someone into joining:

2008-10-20 12:42:10 - King_Herpes: Hit me up Paul, for a game or if you need any advice. Thanks, you are someone I can trust

This is pathetic how they are sucking up to not get reported from people who don't know better.

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:04 pm
by King_Herpes
Man! You guys are sure laying the gravy on thick. Save some for the rest, would ya?

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:07 pm
by Zemljanin
Zemljanin wrote:
lancehoch wrote:The admin have repeatedly stated that they do not and will not check people's inboxes.

Really? Well, my (and not only mine) inbox was not only checked - but even EDITED! I don't need to explain, since everybody remembers it very well...

(I'm not blaming YOU, lancehoch. But you're a spokesman - spokesmen do get a short end, sometimes...)

I am having a private conversation with lancehoch about this issue. A possibility that I'm wrong showed up. It's still open at the moment, but (you all) take my optional apologies, just in case I'm wrong...

EDIT:
It's already virtually sure that I'm wrong. So my apology stands...

Re: Queen_Gonorrhea and King_Herpes [noted]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:08 am
by motionstop
it's true. without the pm there is no evidence. all you can do, right now, at least, is foe's list. if you're interested. or go to flame wars. i think you can do that.
;)