Icesleet and Bmurf92 [Busted +2]

[mcred]

Accused:

Icesleet
Bmurf92


The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game number(s):

Game 3367551




Comments: Admitted secret diplomacy, affecting gameplay.

[e_i_pi]

I'm upgrading this one...


Accused:

Icesleet
Bmurf92
Dog92
smurf42


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis


Game number(s):

Game 3339456
Game 3347406
Game 3352562
Game 3367551
Game 3353121
Game 3353105
Game 3353086
Game 3353077
Game 3353057
Game 3353026
Game 3352298
Game 3352969
...and a host of others


Comments: Looks like the one player to me. Most recent logoff times are...
Bmurf92: 3:28am
Dog92: 3:29am
smurf42: 3:30am
Icesleet: 7:24pm

Icesleet has gained the most out of any of the games. Games involving multiple counts of them have them all joining the games before anyone else joins. First game this started occuring seems to be Game 3339456

[e_i_pi]

Game chat from that game quoted above...

2008-10-01 18:01:26 - mcred: What's up with pink and cyan? They look very cosy on their border....
2008-10-01 21:21:41 - Icesleet: we made a deal
2008-10-01 21:24:53 - Bmurf92: lol
2008-10-01 23:24:36 - mcred: Could you please review the rules: Rule #2: No secret diplomacy
2008-10-01 23:26:29 - mcred: What do the rest of you think about this?
2008-10-02 08:42:06 - kinghenrik: i was thinking it from the beginning
2008-10-02 08:42:22 - kinghenrik: this is a big shit, you can close deals, but only in game chat
2008-10-02 15:32:47 - zissou2: it is definately against rules.
2008-10-02 19:23:45 - Icesleet: lo siento
2008-10-02 19:53:56 - mcred: I guess we pass it on to the moderators, who can deal with Icesleet and Bmurf92. It was probably ignorance rather than malice involved but it has made the game biased against the rest of us.
2008-10-02 20:01:36 - mcred: I posted in the Cheating and Abuse forum: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=65507
2008-10-02 20:29:59 - e_i_pi: I suggest looking at the history of these players guys, especially the history of 1v1 games between Icesleet and another player smurf42
2008-10-02 20:30:32 - e_i_pi: I don't think it would be unfair if everyone ganged up on them until they were eliminated, just my humble opinion
2008-10-02 20:52:43 - Bmurf92: those 1v1 games was a series he and i set up
2008-10-02 21:00:27 - Icesleet: ya and i powned u lol!
2008-10-02 21:41:10 - e_i_pi: Ahem... you guys haven't played 1v1 together
2008-10-02 21:41:22 - e_i_pi: Icesleet has played 1v1 against smurf42
2008-10-02 21:41:39 - e_i_pi: Try incriminating yourself more next time douchebag

Bmurf92 hasn't played a single 1v1 game against anyone. At all. Ever.
Icesleet has not 'powned' Bmurf92
Icesleet has, in fact, powned himself.

...and to quote Lionel Hutz...

"Case dismissed!"

[Fireside Poet]

Suspects:
Icesleet
Bmurf92

Verdict: Busted for multiple accounts along with Dog92 & smurf42

[mmrrgg98]

so does this mean everyone else loses this game to these two?

[pancakemix]

They finish their games. So if they happen to be winning, then they can win, but that's the last time that'll happen.

[e_i_pi]

From the game chat of that game:

2008-10-03 00:59:44 - Icesleet: thats ok ill just make more accounts muhahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Any chance of a perma-ban here?

[kinghenrik]

This is too obvious. They even admit and laugh about it. Is there any chance this game will be disregarded? If this is tolerated at conquerclub, i guess the fun is gone, playing games..