Page 1 of 1

didibibi and dabos [noted]

PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:25 pm
by Shrinky
Accused:

didibibi
dabos




The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 3296187


Comments:

didbibi-yellow
dabos-pink

I have a sneaking suspicion that there might be a secret alliance going on here. In the beginning i saw 1/2 moves by didibibi that suggested he was paving the way for dabos to make a kill. I put it down to inexperience at that time.
But then when it came to didibibi trying to eliminate me later on, he fell short on one place and I still had a few others terts that were left standing. I told didibibi to not weaken himself(and me) down on taking those terts otherwise dabos would have gotten me easily. He still continued to try and run through me paying no heed to me.
Now the clincher according to me "2008-09-22 23:27:59 - didibibi: pink its my father"
"its" is actually "is"

It may not actually be enough evidence, but i still wanted to check this out.
Apologies to them if i'm wrong.

Re: didibibi and dabos

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 2:39 am
by Jeff Hardy
lol they might not be doing it on purpose but i find it hard to play completly fair when friends/family are playing because i dont want to attack them :lol:

dunno if they actually have an alliance but it does look like they are more willing to attack you then they are each other

Re: didibibi and dabos

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:39 am
by king achilles
I have checked didibibi and dabos and they are not multi accounts with each other. We would need more than one game of strong evidence of malicious plays involving the same players to warrant a block. This report is noted.

Re: didibibi and dabos

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:21 am
by Shrinky
king achilles wrote:I have checked didibibi and dabos and they are not multi accounts with each other. We would need more than one game of strong evidence of malicious plays involving the same players to warrant a block. This report is noted.


In the first place i said secret alliance, not multi account :lol:

I checked time logs in some earlier games and that disproved multi theory.

Re: didibibi and dabos [noted]

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:27 am
by lancehoch
He said there would need to be more games presented for a block to be considered, that is the only punishment handed out for a secret alliance.

Re: didibibi and dabos [noted]

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:40 am
by Shrinky
I'm aware of what he said. I was just pointing that i said only secret alliance, not multi.

Re: didibibi and dabos [noted]

PostPosted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 11:52 am
by lancehoch
The hunters usually run a multi check those reported for a secret alliance anyway.

Re: didibibi and dabos [noted]

PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:19 am
by Shrinky
thanks for heads up