Conquer Club

Accused:

duck man
duck woman



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]



Comments:both accounts just created. figured it was worth a look since "they" are teaming in games

looks like one of those really obvious ones

I disagree.. I think they are just friends.. theyve only played two games 1 v 1.. and 2 games with other players.. In the 1 v1 games duck man won twice yeah.. but he has more experience than duck woman. So again i think they are just friends and you cant really tell off of such little information.. Even if their IPs match doesnt mean that they are multis.. only way to prove they are multis is if the log in times corresponds with such a claim. This is my opinion at least.. you guys need to get more of a life then to try to report everyone just slightly suspicous.

Diamonds14 wrote:I disagree.. I think they are just friends.. theyve only played two games 1 v 1.. and 2 games with other players.. In the 1 v1 games duck man won twice yeah.. but he has more experience than duck woman. So again i think they are just friends and you cant really tell off of such little information.. Even if their IPs match doesnt mean that they are multis.. only way to prove they are multis is if the log in times corresponds with such a claim. This is my opinion at least.. you guys need to get more of a life then to try to report everyone just slightly suspicous.

I agree with your 1st comment Diamonds entirely, it may be a little early just yet to tell if they are multis or not & yes it is possible that they could just well be friends.
However, it does look more than a little suss mate so i feel Johnny is right in asking this question.
I know one thing though,i for one would not be too happy to be a victim of them,should Johnnys query prove to be correct,would you?
You also say that they need to get more of a life for reporting everyone just slightly suspicious!
Then cant it also be argued, that maybe you could also get more of a life rather than to check up on those who report to see if what they suspect is correct or not? Please No offence intended

Deadly intent wrote:

Diamonds14 wrote:I disagree.. I think they are just friends.. theyve only played two games 1 v 1.. and 2 games with other players.. In the 1 v1 games duck man won twice yeah.. but he has more experience than duck woman. So again i think they are just friends and you cant really tell off of such little information.. Even if their IPs match doesnt mean that they are multis.. only way to prove they are multis is if the log in times corresponds with such a claim. This is my opinion at least.. you guys need to get more of a life then to try to report everyone just slightly suspicious.

I agree with your 1st comment Diamonds entirely, it may be a little early just yet to tell if they are multis or not & yes it is possible that they could just well be friends.
However, it does look more than a little suss mate so i feel Johnny is right in asking this question.
I know one thing though,i for one would not be too happy to be a victim of them,should Johnnys query prove to be correct,would you?
You also say that they need to get more of a life for reporting everyone just slightly suspicious!
Then cant it also be argued, that maybe you could also get more of a life rather than to check up on those who report to see if what they suspect is correct or not? Please No offence intended

I casually go through the 'cheating & abuse' forum and the 'suggestion/bugs' forum when i have a few extra minutes and i look at the subjects that have someone's name that i recognized in it.. or in this case if the names of the accused are funny or interesting. But Jonny hasn't played a game against either of them.. so what does he do to find these people? Just look up players who have recently joined CC? I mean come on that pretty sad if you do that.. Also, i know of a couple of examples, only one that i can come up with right this second but i can find the other ones im sure, of a new recruit being falsely accused and is that a kind of welcome that makes that player want to stay in CC? Not really. So like if you are so concerned with someone being a multi mark them.. and check back on them in a week or something and see if you have more evidence of your claim. Instead of just throwing up a new thread every time something slight suspicious comes up because thats more work on the moderators/admins/multihunters/the servers.. and about playing against a multi.. i actually really dont care.. i join games to have fun and to get points.. so if a player beats me i look at what he did and learn from it.. whether its a cook or a brigadier. I played one of *manimal multis knowing fully that it was *manimal.. no offense intended.. just supporting my audacious claim.

Diamonds14 wrote:I casually go through the 'cheating & abuse' forum and the 'suggestion/bugs' forum when i have a few extra minutes and i look at the subjects that have someone's name that i recognized in it.. or in this case if the names of the accused are funny or interesting. But Jonny hasn't played a game against either of them.. so what does he do to find these people? Just look up players who have recently joined CC? I mean come on that pretty sad if you do that.. Also, i know of a couple of examples, only one that i can come up with right this second but i can find the other ones im sure, of a new recruit being falsely accused and is that a kind of welcome that makes that player want to stay in CC? Not really. So like if you are so concerned with someone being a multi mark them.. and check back on them in a week or something and see if you have more evidence of your claim. Instead of just throwing up a new thread every time something slight suspicious comes up because thats more work on the moderators/admins/multihunters/the servers.. and about playing against a multi.. i actually really dont care.. i join games to have fun and to get points.. so if a player beats me i look at what he did and learn from it.. whether its a cook or a brigadier. I played one of *manimal multis knowing fully that it was *manimal.. no offense intended.. just supporting my audacious claim.

I will concede that perhaps just an "e" ticket would have been a better rout to take at this early stage rather than taking it into the forums aswel.It is what i would have done if i had any suspisions anyway.
Mind you,unlike johnny, i would have had to have played them first at least & be fairly certain that they were working as one,but i still think Johnny could well be right in what he has implied,but only time will tell us that. In a way kinda hope he is right, because if he is wrong,like you say, its not the best welcome to the site is it
Unlike yourself aswel however,i hate cheats & i think that people who are multis dont deserve to be on the same site as me let alone in the same game!
I play for fun also & i dont mind losing points when i lose,but i want them taken from me fairly & not by players that have to cheat to win as they are without honour.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Accused:

duck man
duck woman



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]



Comments:both accounts just created. figured it was worth a look since "they" are teaming in games

or maybe they're friends who joined together and wanna play together. if theyre on the same team, they arent doing anything to gain free points...

Deadly intent wrote:Mind you,unlike johnny, i would have had to have played them first at least & be fairly certain that they were working as one,but i still think Johnny could well be right in what he has implied,but only time will tell us that. In a way kinda hope he is right, because if he is wrong,like you say, its not the best welcome to the site is it
Unlike yourself aswel however,i hate cheats & i think that people who are multis dont deserve to be on the same site as me let alone in the same game!
I play for fun also & i dont mind losing points when i lose,but i want them taken from me fairly & not by players that have to cheat to win as they are without honour.

Oh i agree with you fully. Im not saying that there isnt a chance that he is right.. cause they can be multis, im just saying its way to early to accuse someone especially when you havent even played them. And i dont like cheaters, im not trying to support them in any way.. im just supporting new players and CC's first impression. Sorry.. just throwing in my opinion on the situation. Also, doesnt it say when posting a cheating report to be sure of before you accuse someone? It does and jonny is openly breaking, time after time, with these suspicion reports. Granted he is right sometimes, but we are advised to be sure before posting.

I am playing the ducks now it a doubles and they missed 3 in a row so far, I did suspect them from beginning but was giving them a chance.

duck man and duck woman are busted.