mrjking and kingstreets [Busted]
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:57 pm251153
260104
The accused are suspected of:
A secret alliance at the very least, if not multis.
Game number(s):
Game 3234225
They both sat on entirely undefended bonuses the entire game.
Both of them attacked me instead of each other's bonus. I had no bonus and was the weakest player throughout, and was knocked out sharpish.
They both took their turns directly after one-another, with almost exactly the same waiting time between taking turns.
Green is clearly a competent player, as he broke my own bonuses several times. He did not act the same way towards red, entirely ignoring red's bonus despite it being undefended.
It came to this after I'd been knocked out, because green and red visibly allied against me when the would have had no option but to attack each other's bonuses.
From chat:
2008-09-10 18:59:19 - TheSupremeCourt: mrjking, keeping no defence on a bonus and not attacking any of his bonuses is pretty damning evidence of at least a secret alliance
2008-09-10 18:59:48 - mrjking: i do not know about you blue but i do not think he is on cuz he is not replyin on here
2008-09-10 18:59:59 - TheSupremeCourt: green and red, can you both type answers at a similar time? Or will it take you long enough to log out and back in again before you can type an answer to this question?
2008-09-10 19:00:35 - mrjking: well there is no rule in secret alliance is there
...
2008-09-10 19:04:07 - TheSupremeCourt: You know him? Did you have a secret alliance?
2008-09-10 19:04:33 - TheSupremeCourt: I don't care if you did, I just want to know if I was beaten in a 1v1v1 or if I was beaten honourably instead, fighting against 2 seperate guys
2008-09-10 19:04:41 - mrjking: he is gone for the day he dose work and he sent me an im on msn sayin that he is gone till later on
260104
The accused are suspected of:
A secret alliance at the very least, if not multis.
Game number(s):
Game 3234225
They both sat on entirely undefended bonuses the entire game.
Both of them attacked me instead of each other's bonus. I had no bonus and was the weakest player throughout, and was knocked out sharpish.
They both took their turns directly after one-another, with almost exactly the same waiting time between taking turns.
Green is clearly a competent player, as he broke my own bonuses several times. He did not act the same way towards red, entirely ignoring red's bonus despite it being undefended.
It came to this after I'd been knocked out, because green and red visibly allied against me when the would have had no option but to attack each other's bonuses.
From chat:
2008-09-10 18:59:19 - TheSupremeCourt: mrjking, keeping no defence on a bonus and not attacking any of his bonuses is pretty damning evidence of at least a secret alliance
2008-09-10 18:59:48 - mrjking: i do not know about you blue but i do not think he is on cuz he is not replyin on here
2008-09-10 18:59:59 - TheSupremeCourt: green and red, can you both type answers at a similar time? Or will it take you long enough to log out and back in again before you can type an answer to this question?
2008-09-10 19:00:35 - mrjking: well there is no rule in secret alliance is there
...
2008-09-10 19:04:07 - TheSupremeCourt: You know him? Did you have a secret alliance?
2008-09-10 19:04:33 - TheSupremeCourt: I don't care if you did, I just want to know if I was beaten in a 1v1v1 or if I was beaten honourably instead, fighting against 2 seperate guys
2008-09-10 19:04:41 - mrjking: he is gone for the day he dose work and he sent me an im on msn sayin that he is gone till later on