Conquer Club

Accused: rms

The accused are suspected of:
Being a new multi of a CC veteran.


Game numbers:
Game 2987870 - World 2.1 game
Game 3032003 - Dungeon of Draknor game

Comments:
I'm always suspicious when I see a new player with surprisingly good play.
rms has only played two games. One was on World 2.1 Doubles. He played the game very well, and his team easily won. Play I'd expect from a seasoned veteran, but he's only a new recruit.
The other game, on Dungeon of Draknor, he is doing very well, and looks like he has a good chance of winning that game also.
Based on how confusing Dungeon of Draknor is, and how good his play is in both of his games, I suspect that he might be a CC veteran playing through a new account.

rms, if I'm wrong (which wouldn't surprise me), please take this accusation as a compliment. I'm only suspicious because your play in the doubles game was so good. Not what I'd expect from a new player.

Sugg: Can people be punished for starting a thread in CHeating and Abuse every time for getting beat by a newb? I've noticed it happens a lot and they result is pretty much always cleared.

Simon Viavant wrote:Sugg: Can people be punished for starting a thread in CHeating and Abuse every time for getting beat by a newb? I've noticed it happens a lot and they result is pretty much always cleared.

Hey, at least it'd be one less multi to worry about.

I wouldn't be surprised either way, multi or not. Just putting the topic out there, just to be sure.

I wouldn't have started a thread if it was just one game. I'm ok with getting beat by a new player. I'm mostly suspicious because of his play on Dungeons of Draknor. That map looks confusing for me, and I'd expect it to be very difficult for a new member.
I could easily be wrong, though. I don't know.

Simon Viavant wrote:Sugg: Can people be punished for starting a thread in CHeating and Abuse every time for getting beat by a newb? I've noticed it happens a lot and they result is pretty much always cleared.

honestly can you shut up? he didn't get beaten and this newbie is playing better than you x100 with no experience.

Kemmler wrote:

Simon Viavant wrote:Sugg: Can people be punished for starting a thread in CHeating and Abuse every time for getting beat by a newb? I've noticed it happens a lot and they result is pretty much always cleared.

honestly can you shut up? he didn't get beaten and this newbie is playing better than you x100 with no experience.

Actually, yeah. I was beaten by rms.
It was the doubles 2.1 game.
If he's a legit player, I'll be looking forwards to playing another game or two with him. I think he will be very good if he continues playing.

I've noticed that you haven't played a single game on Draknor on wcaclimbing. Maybe if you tried you'd see that the rules for that map are in no way as complicated as they appear to be..you simply have to follow the arrows.
World 2.1 is also very simple. It doesn't surprise me at all that a new player might be able to play both maps. Perhaps you just underestimate them a bit too much?

Crossboard wrote:World 2.1 is also very simple. It doesn't surprise me at all that a new player might be able to play both maps. Perhaps you just underestimate them a bit too much?

Maybe I do.
yeah, I've never played on Draknor. I'll give it a try sometime.

if you guys all are sure he's innocent, should I just drop the report?
Don't need it here if he is just a good player...

This is the first C&A report I've posted in as long as I can remember. I could easily be wrong.

wcaclimbing wrote:Maybe I do.
yeah, I've never played on Draknor. I'll give it a try sometime.

if you guys all are sure he's innocent, should I just drop the report?
Don't need it here if he is just a good player...

This is the first C&A report I've posted in as long as I can remember. I could easily be wrong.

No, keep the report as it is. You are a veteran and you got the feeling that something wasn't just right. Now, he may be a multi or he may not. But if you got a possible multi hunch after the games, well... let's see what happens.

rms does not appear to be a multi account. This is cleared but still noted.

ok. glad to hear i was wrong.