Conquer Club

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:58 pm**

Accused:

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Other: <Member Harassment, Stalking>

Game number(s):

Game 2973712

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:59 pm**

all but 2 are already banned

--cena

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:27 pm**

Like cena said, all but 2 have been busted.

The two that are active (macleclerc and thegrimest) have been taking their turns, joining games, and silent in game chats.

What makes you think they would be multi's? I don't see anything out of the ordinary with the game number that you posted.

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:31 pm**

The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Like cena said, all but 2 have been busted.

The two that are active (macleclerc and thegrimest) have been taking their turns, joining games, and silent in game chats.

What makes you think they would be multi's? I don't see anything out of the ordinary with the game number that you posted.

apart from he lost. For once I must say they did all gang up on him. But then again it was really only the multis

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:33 pm**

Who are you asking, Sir?

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:34 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:Who are you asking, Sir?

both of us I think. I posted my opinion anyway

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:41 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:Who are you asking, Sir?

Yes I was asking both of you.

Cena, I could see that except the two accounts that haven't been banned didn't appear to have "teamed up" as they didn't attack KLOBBER at all. The first attacked the second, and the second attacked some other person (could have been "hunting" for where he was I guess, but it doesn't seem likely. I'm about to leave for a while, but does someone mind checking (I didn't think of it when I checked the other games) if the two accounts still in question have played any other games with eachother?

And KLOBBER, I would still like to know your opinion on this sir. It appears you were ganged up on by some of the other accounts (I am currently being attacked by a multi that was caught yesterday in one of my games), but I am still unsure as to why they would be accused (unless it was just because all the others were caught so you're "playing it safe" to have them double check the other accounts as well).

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:43 pm**

Are you under the impression, Sir, that I am a multi-hunter?

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:44 pm**

Yeah thats why I said

But then again it was really only the multis

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 6:10 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:Are you under the impression, Sir, that I am a multi-hunter?

No, I am definitely NOT under that impression. I just assumed there was more evidence behind your accusation other than that they were in a game with multi's. I mean if that was the case someone could accuse you of being a multi. Now that accusation (just like the one of these two accounts) could be true, it could be false, but if we are just saying that because someone is in a game with multi's they are suspect to be one then you would have to add your name to the list as well.

Therefore, with that logic, I would assume there is more reason to suspect them than just that game.

So, KLOBBER, is there anything other reason you suspect them, or are you just making sure they check all accounts that played in that game since 5 of 8 players in the game were busted already?

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:22 pm**

How do you mean?

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:31 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:How do you mean?

I'm sorry for your continual confusion. I'm not sure how to make it any simpler than I already have, but for you, sir, I will try.

Besides that they were in a game with multis (that killed you off), do you have any evidence they may be multi's, or are you just guessing because the other accounts in the game were?

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:34 pm**

Who wants to know?

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:05 pm**

*yawn* I'm getting tired of asking logical questions to understand why you are accusing them of multiple accounts. I'm not sure if you are set on trying to (or trying to get me to) derail this topic from it's original intent...but don't fret! Perhaps these questions are too much to ask of you, so we'll just stop the endless circle and let the multi hunter's do their thing

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:21 pm**

Do you think you may need a nap?

Good day, Sir!

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:39 pm**

Please remain on topic KLOBBER, I do not want to have to lock another thread.

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:42 pm**

lancehoch wrote:Please remain on topic KLOBBER, I do not want to have to lock another thread.

you should

all he's doing right now is accusing new recruits of multis for no apparent reason other than joining his games...

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:46 pm**

lancehoch wrote:Please remain on topic KLOBBER, I do not want to have to lock another thread.

Okay, Lancehoch, I will not respond to any more of these off-topic and foolish posts.

Good day, Sir!

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:56 pm**

The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
KLOBBER wrote:Sir, didn't you just tell me that you are not a multi-hunter?

Yes sir, you are correct in saying I told you I am not a multi hunter. However it appears to be wasting their time by accusing someone without any evidence. I'm just asking you present some form of evidence that would lead you to believe they are multi's. I am assuming, although I must applaud you for using the form, without any actual evidence the hunters may not look into such a case

If the accused are multis, Sir, and the hunters do not look into the case, then that inaction will only hurt the site.

I have already foed the accounts, so it does not affect me; to me, this issue is solved. I reported them as a favor to the site, but if you would like me to stop reporting multis, that is something that we may be able to negotiate. Is that what you want?

I hope you have a wonderful day!

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:02 pm**

KLOBBER wrote:
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:
KLOBBER wrote:Sir, didn't you just tell me that you are not a multi-hunter?

Yes sir, you are correct in saying I told you I am not a multi hunter. However it appears to be wasting their time by accusing someone without any evidence. I'm just asking you present some form of evidence that would lead you to believe they are multi's. I am assuming, although I must applaud you for using the form, without any actual evidence the hunters may not look into such a case

If the accused are multis, Sir, and the hunters do not look into the case, then that inaction will only hurt the site.

I have already foed the accounts, so it does not affect me; to me, this issue is solved. I reported them as a favor to the site, but if you would like me to stop reporting multis, that is something that we may be able to negotiate. Is that what you want?

I hope you have a wonderful day!

Excuse me sir, but that quote wasn't from this thread (but rather from the one that was locked). As for the continued trial to get this thread derailed like you have the other, I believe it is time for me to call in the Big Monkey!

P.S. - No, I do not wish you to stop reporting multi's, but rather I wish you would not randomly report accounts as "multi's" without sufficient evidence to back it up. Otherwise it's just false accusations that waste the time of the mighty hunters.

P.P.S. - If you would like to continue this discussion, please create a new thread in GD (since it's related to the site), off topic (if you wish to derail it like you have tried to do with your recent threads here), or PM me (I'm always happy to answer questions members may have

)

Posted: **Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:04 pm**

Lets let the multi hunters do their job.

--Andy

Posted: **Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:18 am**

thegrimest and macleclerc are cleared. The rest are busted.

Conquer Club

More Multis [cleared/busted]

More Multis [cleared/busted]

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis

Re: More Multis