shitbag and adelecoops [cleared]

[MuchMore]

Accused:

• shitbag
• adelecoops

The accused are suspected of:

• Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

• Game 2814785

Comments:
THough I was the game leader, but as per the rules players should openly declare a diplomacy before having a go at me. But they didnt and had or are still having un-defended boundaries with each other. Kindly look into the matter.

[lancehoch]

While I am not saying anything officially, there are times when it is just understood that the two weaker players shouldnt attack one another. These are not alliances, it is just acting in ones own best interest. It does not benefit either player to waste armies attacking the strongest player and it actually will benefit them if the other weak player keeps a continent, because the extra armies will be used against the stronger player. Again, nothing official, just an observation.

[king achilles]

This is their only game played together so far.

As what lancehoch said:

"there are times when it is just understood that the two weaker players shouldnt attack one another. These are not alliances, it is just acting in ones own best interest. It does not benefit either player to waste armies attacking the strongest player and it actually will benefit them if the other weak player keeps a continent, because the extra armies will be used against the stronger player."

[lancehoch]

You quoted me correctly, but I made a mistake in my wording. See the red for the change.

While I am not saying anything officially, there are times when it is just understood that the two weaker players shouldnt attack one another. These are not alliances, it is just acting in ones own best interest. It does not benefit either player to waste armies attacking the other weak player and it actually will benefit them if the other weak player keeps a continent, because the extra armies will be used against the stronger player. Again, nothing official, just an observation.

[Shrinky]

You quoted me correctly, but I made a mistake in my wording. See the red for the change.

While I am not saying anything officially, there are times when it is just understood that the two weaker players shouldnt attack one another. These are not alliances, it is just acting in ones own best interest. It does not benefit either player to waste armies attacking the other weak player and it actually will benefit them if the other weak player keeps a continent, because the extra armies will be used against the stronger player. Again, nothing official, just an observation.

lol, u got me confused there for a moment.
I was looking and re-looking and RE-LOOKING at the post to find out where was the goddamn correction.
I kept reading it wrong. I was reading original post as "other weak player keeps a continent" and new post as "other weak player blah blah"
Basically ur other weak player bit was repeated twice and that twisted me up totally.

[king achilles]

I won't quote you anymore then.