Page 1 of 1

Typherin and wolfman1969 [noted]

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:27 am
by kletka
Accused:


The accused are suspected of:
  • Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game number(s):


Comments:
The players broke Rule #2: No secret diplomacy. While they announced their alliance in chat, they conducted negotiations via PM as it is clear from the following phrase in chat:
2008-07-01 11:43:57 - Typherin: I got a better plan, Read pm

Re: Typherin and wolfman1969

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:52 am
by Typherin
Image

Mod's are more than welcome to check my outgoing messages, there was no message sent.

Therefor no abuse of any rule / system has occured. Run along.



Typhers

Re: Typherin and wolfman1969

PostPosted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:49 pm
by Scott-Land
Step 1: [Mark/Unmark as important]
Step 2: [Delete marked]
Step 3: GO !


Not implying anything but that screen shot really proves nothing. #-o

Re: Typherin and wolfman1969

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:13 am
by dandrobie
Wonder if the mods can check both their inbox??
(Since wolfman1969 also denies recieving any PM's in the game chat)

Re: Typherin and wolfman1969

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:26 am
by Scott-Land
dandrobie wrote:Wonder if the mods can check both their inbox??
(Since wolfman1969 also denies recieving any PM's in the game chat)



Mods ' say' they don't go into player's personal pm box. :lol: :lol: At least they don't tell us if they do....

Re: Typherin and wolfman1969

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:14 am
by king achilles
Before, I think it was allowed to talk about your moves outside the game chat between truced opponents. But from one of our recent updates, rule #2 has been changed to encompass all forms of secret diplomacy.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=53112

Rule #2: No secret diplomacy

Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating attacks. Secret diplomacy can be hard to prove, but if you suspect it you should leave the players in question appropriate ratings. If you feel certain about players engaging in secret diplomacy consider reporting them in the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum by posting a new topic.


For now, this will be taken lightly as we can consider that perhaps, not all members do take time to read the forum for updates/announcements, even when regarding the rules. Typherin has been reported before for alleged secret alliances, but in both times, he was cleared. Since this is not a secret alliance case, he is off the hook for now. Next time, any unfortunate player he is found guilty with of breaking rule #2, they will be blocked.

Re: Typherin and wolfman1969 [noted]

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:11 pm
by LFAW
Hey... I see my name... Lol

Re: Typherin and wolfman1969

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 12:23 pm
by t-o-m
Typherin wrote:Image

Mod's are more than welcome to check my outgoing messages, there was no message sent.

Therefor no abuse of any rule / system has occured. Run along.



Typhers

Scott-Land wrote:Step 1: [Mark/Unmark as important]
Step 2: [Delete marked]
Step 3: GO !

however it says 42 new/unread messages, and we saw 8 read messages.
so...?

but he still could have deleted them easily lol


Scott-Land wrote:

Not implying anything but that screen shot really proves nothing. #-o

exactly :)