Page 1 of 1

kbriaco & luis58 [busted]

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:24 pm
by xroads
Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

Be sure before you accuse someone!
</DELETE ME>

Accused:


The accused are suspected of:
  • Being Multis
    [x]Conducting Secret Diplomacy
  • Severe PM Abuse
  • Other: <Explanation>


Game number(s):
  • Game 2691449
  • [game]xxxxxxx[/game]
  • [game]xxxxxxx[/game]
  • [game]xxxxxxx[/game]


Comments:
Obvious secret alliance or multi. Both from Venzuela & both have played together 6 times now.

Re: kbriaco & luis58

PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:01 pm
by Frop
Looking through all their games I think it's safe to assume the following active Venezuelan players are also associated in some manner.

The following accounts are also associated, but have already been deleted. They have been partly(?) dealt with in this previous thread.

It goes on and on, they have played so many games together I can't possibly find them all.

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [pending]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:48 am
by king achilles
kbriaco is busted with alvaro58, EL TEMPLO and luis58.

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [pending]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:49 am
by Frop
king achilles wrote:kbriaco is busted with alvaro58, EL TEMPLO and luis58.

Are you kidding me? The other accounts have got to be associated with these players, what has led you to believe only these 3 are multis? Did you really look at all their games or did you just run a simple IP check? Please add the reasoning and evidence to verdicts, that should be standard practice.

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [busted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:07 am
by Darwins_Bane
the thing is though, if they add the reasoning, then they partly reveal how they find out ppl are multis. If ppl know this, they can find ways around it. I can understand though that it is frustrating not getting an explanation.

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [busted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:32 am
by xroads
This is about the 4th multi I have turned in.

I guess that is what I get for starting alot of public games.

Now hopefully I can get the game deleted so I dont loose points to the dirt bags

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [busted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:39 am
by Darwins_Bane
xroads wrote:This is about the 4th multi I have turned in.

I guess that is what I get for starting alot of public games.

Now hopefully I can get the game deleted so I dont loose points to the dirt bags



they wont delete the game. If you lost to them then you lose the points you normally would have had they not been multis....unfortunately

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [busted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:09 am
by xroads
Darwins_Bane wrote:
xroads wrote:This is about the 4th multi I have turned in.

I guess that is what I get for starting alot of public games.

Now hopefully I can get the game deleted so I dont loose points to the dirt bags



they wont delete the game. If you lost to them then you lose the points you normally would have had they not been multis....unfortunately


Thats a crock of shit. Caught cheating redhanded, but you get away with it this time.

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [busted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:20 am
by Darwins_Bane
xroads wrote:
Darwins_Bane wrote:
xroads wrote:This is about the 4th multi I have turned in.

I guess that is what I get for starting alot of public games.

Now hopefully I can get the game deleted so I dont loose points to the dirt bags



they wont delete the game. If you lost to them then you lose the points you normally would have had they not been multis....unfortunately


Thats a crock of shit. Caught cheating redhanded, but you get away with it this time.



the real kicker is they can just buy premium back/for the the first time, and be back 2 normal

Re: kbriaco & luis58 [busted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:47 am
by Frop
Darwins_Bane wrote:the thing is though, if they add the reasoning, then they partly reveal how they find out ppl are multis. If ppl know this, they can find ways around it. I can understand though that it is frustrating not getting an explanation.

It works both ways - aspiring cheaters with average IT knowledge (so little to none) will be discouraged if they know what people will be busted for. They are less likely to find an alternative and will stick to playing fair (out of fear of getting caught).