davep_747, blahblahblah2, the_king747, i_win99 [Busted +2]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Accused:
[list]
[*]davep_747
[*]blahblahblah2
[*]the_king747
[*]i_win99
The accused are suspected of:
[list]
[*]Conducting Secret Diplomacy -or-
[*]Being Multies
Game number(s):
[list]
[*]2396457
[*]2654759
[*]2581998
Comments:
[i]game # 2396457: I looked into davep_747 because I have supported an accusation of him being a multi with the_king747. As I was looking through his feedback, I found this was what he left, and got back in return:
{from davep_747} Hey good game nice moves
blahblahblah2's response: same to you. we gonna team up again...sometime...
This game was NOT a team game and was only between two people. blahblahblah2 did not even try to take any of davep_747's territoriesm which obviously shows that a deal that was something like you-lose-to-me-and-i'll-help-you-later was made.
[i]game # 2654759: Notice how similar their names are: they both have an underscore and 747 in them. The underscore is understandable, but 747 is a little bit too much of a coinsidence.
I think the_king747 is simply being used to pave the way for davep_747 's victory since he has not taken any of his territories (other than the last turn) when it was smart for him to do so. He could have destroyed every one of davep_747 's bonuses because they were UNprotected (I wonder why....)
Also, the_king747 did not even try to defend what bonus he had.... etc.... etc....
Just wanted to point out the "fishiness" in their gameplay as well as the being online at almost the same time, but never exactly the same.
I found some interesting background info about davep_747 from game # 2387462 this was in the chat:
LordMetro: ive been playing with davep alot to teach them to play, but ive been gone for a few days, and today i come back and the fuckers used my password and have been playing for you. this is unacceptable, and im pretty sure im done playing with them
2008-05-20 08:39:11 - LordMetro: if theres anything i can do to fix this, let me know, id prefer to not have my account messed up with negative feedback because of my new irresponsible friends
Aslo, I found some complaints about the_king747 fromthe chat in game # 2581998:
2008-06-04 16:52:48 - thejaimster: what the hell are you doing king you havent attack blue once
2008-06-04 17:03:11 - i_win99: what, i did but lost
2008-06-04 17:03:18 - i_win99: he did
2008-06-04 17:03:34 - the_king747: yeah i did
2008-06-04 17:03:53 - the_king747: in niger
2008-06-04 17:16:38 - thejaimster: i say you let me win
2008-06-04 17:17:23 - thejaimster: or else im going to rat you out
2008-06-04 17:18:00 - thejaimster: i know its only one person
(If you look through the game log, you will see that the_king747 never attacked i_win99 in Niger and that the one territory of i_win99's that he took was near the start of the game and it did not hurt i_win99 at all)
[list]
[*]davep_747
[*]blahblahblah2
[*]the_king747
[*]i_win99
The accused are suspected of:
[list]
[*]Conducting Secret Diplomacy -or-
[*]Being Multies
Game number(s):
[list]
[*]2396457
[*]2654759
[*]2581998
Comments:
[i]game # 2396457: I looked into davep_747 because I have supported an accusation of him being a multi with the_king747. As I was looking through his feedback, I found this was what he left, and got back in return:
{from davep_747} Hey good game nice moves
blahblahblah2's response: same to you. we gonna team up again...sometime...
This game was NOT a team game and was only between two people. blahblahblah2 did not even try to take any of davep_747's territoriesm which obviously shows that a deal that was something like you-lose-to-me-and-i'll-help-you-later was made.
[i]game # 2654759: Notice how similar their names are: they both have an underscore and 747 in them. The underscore is understandable, but 747 is a little bit too much of a coinsidence.
I think the_king747 is simply being used to pave the way for davep_747 's victory since he has not taken any of his territories (other than the last turn) when it was smart for him to do so. He could have destroyed every one of davep_747 's bonuses because they were UNprotected (I wonder why....)
Also, the_king747 did not even try to defend what bonus he had.... etc.... etc....
Just wanted to point out the "fishiness" in their gameplay as well as the being online at almost the same time, but never exactly the same.
I found some interesting background info about davep_747 from game # 2387462 this was in the chat:
LordMetro: ive been playing with davep alot to teach them to play, but ive been gone for a few days, and today i come back and the fuckers used my password and have been playing for you. this is unacceptable, and im pretty sure im done playing with them
2008-05-20 08:39:11 - LordMetro: if theres anything i can do to fix this, let me know, id prefer to not have my account messed up with negative feedback because of my new irresponsible friends
Aslo, I found some complaints about the_king747 fromthe chat in game # 2581998:
2008-06-04 16:52:48 - thejaimster: what the hell are you doing king you havent attack blue once
2008-06-04 17:03:11 - i_win99: what, i did but lost
2008-06-04 17:03:18 - i_win99: he did
2008-06-04 17:03:34 - the_king747: yeah i did
2008-06-04 17:03:53 - the_king747: in niger
2008-06-04 17:16:38 - thejaimster: i say you let me win
2008-06-04 17:17:23 - thejaimster: or else im going to rat you out
2008-06-04 17:18:00 - thejaimster: i know its only one person
(If you look through the game log, you will see that the_king747 never attacked i_win99 in Niger and that the one territory of i_win99's that he took was near the start of the game and it did not hurt i_win99 at all)