Page 1 of 1

the [No Form]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:42 pm
by McArthur2
by

PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!
Re: Game #

[b]The accused are suspected of:
[x]
[b]Game number(s):[]

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:08 pm
by SirSebstar
I don't think they are multies.(even though you did not claim them to be)
First of they are from different countries.

Second it's an no cards game, in which the only good strategy is to go for a small bonus, or do not move at all.

thirdly, they never ever played another game together. meaning, they had no reason to trust eachother from the getgo and gamechat is not really buzzing between the both of them.
Frankly, I think you brought a little suspusion and nothing of substance to the table.

Sorry, but I do not agree with your assesment

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:02 pm
by lardingd
you know when it's your turn and you don't move but write in the chat like you did, it's no surprise you went to accuse me of cheating.

Think about it a little, you have all but 1 territory in the americas, if blue hits me in aulstralia, it paves the way for you to win with almost no issue, my thoughts is he didn't like it, and moved to keep a chance of winning, leaving 1s there as a sign of trust against you.

Your accusation just seems to read "they were supposed to bash each other but didn't, not fair"

I don't cheat and the accusation pisses me off

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:36 pm
by McArthur2
The issue is not that Blue moved now. It is that you and he built up armies in Australia during the rest of the game obviously knowing that you would not attack each other. Why did you continue to deploy in Australia when the real baron had overwhelming numbers in Indonesia? You knew he would not attack you.

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:32 pm
by lardingd
Because it seemed clear to me at the time he was waiting for an overwhelming majority since once he had a gap of 8 he still didn't attack, and he also didn't do anything to help whenever I tried to stop you from expanding, so I went screw it, I'll just keep deploying there too.

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:35 am
by SirSebstar
and in a no cards game thats a valid tactic
do a chicken run and you will see what i mean

Re: the [No Form]

PostPosted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:01 pm
by lancehoch
This thread has not had the form filled out for over 5 months. Because of this, it was becoming clutter at the bottom of the C&A forum. It has been moved to the Closed Reports forum. If you would like to have this looked at, please fill out the form and it will be returned to the main C&A forum.