Conquer Club

The accused are suspected of:
Having a secret alliance

Game number(s):
2484691

Comments:
Engaged in a very suspect game against this player and Ruesnarn in our three person classic game. From the very first round, KevinL attacked me all over the board as did Ruesnarn. I then spoke out regarding this and KevinL's response was I shouldn't have left 1's across the board. Ruesnarn said nothing and continued to attack me. As I expected and after Ruesnarn attacked me, Kevin cashed his set and attacked Ruesnarn. Ruesnarn responded to this and my comments "2008-05-21 11:56:35 - ruesnarn: chris this is bullshit...such a sore loser...I DONT KNOW KEVIN!!!!". I then asked who "Chris" was and of course, I received no response from either player. The very next round, Green attacked Kevin, which is very obvious as to why he did it. Of course, Kevin won the game as I expected.
The game log and chat will show and explain all as I made comments to the actions of these players. Kevin, if you need points this bad, just ask. I don't mind losing them because I can get them back in a snap of a finger.

I guess he wanted to say 'Christ, this is bullshit'. CB, I liked the team games we played, but looking at your standard games I can only conclude you have a pretty bad case of the classic CC disease Noobus Suiciditus.

Frop wrote:I guess he wanted to say 'Christ, this is bullshit'. CB, I liked the team games we played, but looking at your standard games I can only conclude you have a pretty bad case of the classic CC disease Noobus Suiciditus.

You guess? Thanks for your clever insight Frop. You didn't play in the game and therefore you don't understand how it went. I play 3 player games continuously and win most. I know when something isn't right in a game. I don't think I have ever posted in this forum regarding cheating players and I've played over 2k games. We'll let the mods take a look and see what they think.

'Clever insight'? Trying to be witty, champ? An obvious typo isn't irrefutable evidence and if you want everybody to agree with you, you should definitely stick to e-tickets instead of posting on the forum.

Apart from that I browsed through a number of your standard games and nearly every game you lose ends in you screaming 'YOU SUICIDED ON ME! NOOB!' or something to that extent, followed by a clear commitment to have the 'suiciding' player (you could also call it 'having bad dice') lose the game on purpose. That thread in here the other day clearly shows you're quite unpleasant to play with if they don't do exactly as you say (not to mention letting you win the game). As I said before, you're a nice chap and a fine partner in team games, but your attitude in standard games leaves a lot to be desired.

Frop wrote:'Clever insight'? Trying to be witty, champ? An obvious typo isn't irrefutable evidence and if you want everybody to agree with you, you should definitely stick to e-tickets instead of posting on the forum.

Apart from that I browsed through a number of your standard games and nearly every game you lose ends in you screaming 'YOU SUICIDED ON ME! NOOB!' or something to that extent, followed by a clear commitment to have the 'suiciding' player (you could also call it 'having bad dice') lose the game on purpose. That thread in here the other day clearly shows you're quite unpleasant to play with if they don't do exactly as you say (not to mention letting you win the game). As I said before, you're a nice chap and a fine partner in team games, but your attitude in standard games leaves a lot to be desired.

LOL. "Letting me win the game" I see that you are one sided Frop. The comment about "Chris" was a minimal part of the game as a whole. Again, you weren't playing in the game so I guess you can't clearly understand the point I am trying to make unless you view the game chat/log. Upon doing so, you will discover that this "team" type attack occurred round 1. Apparently you don't play 3 player games too often and therefore are not well informed on what happens when players team on you. Frop, things like this do happen; I know it is hard to believe, but trust me it does, lol.

Now, seeing as tho we are drifting off the topic at hand, I guess we'll see what the modes have to say.

The game chat is hardly an evidence for a secret alliance. Whether ruesnarn meant chris or christ, that does not conclude they are already in a secret alliance to eliminate you. In this case, I agree that it could be a typo error. Each played their own strategy in this game. If you can provide more of their secret alliance with some of their games played together, then we can support this allegation. For now, they are cleared.