Page 1 of 1
very bad cheating. [noted]
Posted:
Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:36 amby g4s racerke
Subject line: <Put name of accused in subject line>
These are suspected Secret Alliance
Suspect users: JO DYNASTY
THE CHOSEN ONE
Game number:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1920814
Comments:
Bleu and red are i believe one and the same or have secret alliance. I was with 5 an 6 armies on my border (ok winning hand) but blue was with 1 and 24 on borders. Watch game log please.
Posted:
Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:02 amby lancehoch
Please use the proper
form. The mods will not do anything before then.
Posted:
Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:59 amby Fruitcake
Oddly, I do not think blue and red are one. If blue attacked either of the 2 terries adjacent to Gedrosia, he would release those 20 reds in response, in one case 30. The same applies the other way round...the moment red sets foot in Arcosia, blue forces are unleashed. Then green would move in and mop up.
I would be sitting tight, as blue is, hoping green and red got into a war of attrition.
Just my opinion for what it is worth
Posted:
Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:11 pmby KLOBBER
That's not just cheating -- it's very bad cheating!
Posted:
Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:39 pmby g4s racerke
They say no alliance. Maybe it can be true but then they played very bizar. Through all, still won the game thanx to cc that went down on the right moment for me.
Posted:
Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:38 pmby sully800
To prove a secret alliance you will need to provide more evidence to show that its a repeating pattern in multiple games. Also, consider how the defense used by blue works. If you have one or two armies on your borders, but a large force behind the borders you can often secure a continent. Players know that if they break they continent they will get attacked by the large force so they are reluctant to attack.
Posted:
Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:57 amby g4s racerke
Ok Sully, just learned a new strategy. Thx anyway.