Conquer Club

Harrassment via PM still ongoing [sorted]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Harrassment via PM still ongoing [sorted]

Postby risk master2000 on Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:00 pm

Ok Here is the deal I left somebody a negative for shear stupidty in game play and now they are harrassing via Pm and threatening a retalitory feedback what do Ido next besides postin the PM's ?

***
From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 12:49
Subject: feedback
nice lame feedback...whos the idiot?

you attacked me just as much. I had no armies to do anything and you always had one army to where i could get my card so I attacked you just like you did to me.

Remove it or it goes to the mods
***
From: risk master2000
To: grainbelt
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:22
Subject: Re: feedback
send it to the mods it stands or retaliate as this is shown by the fact that you sent me this e-mail and the log shows a different story buddy you played a dumb game and did not attack game leadrer hell you helped him win

_________________
AFRO
***
From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:23
Subject: Re: feedback
and you attacked me all game to, man what a frickin baby..... wah wah i lost poor you. Attacking you to get cards was the only way for me to stay in the game
***
From: risk master2000
To: grainbelt
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:27
Subject: Re: feedback
grainbelt wrote:
and you attacked me all game to, man what a frickin baby..... wah wah i lost poor you. Attacking you to get cards was the only way for me to stay in the game
keep telling your self that and maybe you can eventually convince yourself that you did not hand over the game but in order to keep this imaginary world intact do not look over game log and see the difference in what you say and what happened

_________________
AFRO
***
From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:26
Subject: Re: feedback
expect the same feedback for whining about a secret alliance , and doing the same thing then
***
From: risk master2000
To: grainbelt
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:28
Subject: Re: feedback
grainbelt wrote:
expect the same feedback for whining about a secret alliance , and doing the same thing then
thank you for the e-mails though so I can submit them as proof of retalitroy feedback you really are making my case easy


***
From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:32
Subject: Re: feedback
your funny...you did the exact same thing so welcome to ignore and negative feedback also

From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:32
Subject: Re: feedback
they dont accept that anyways but you can try
***
From: risk master2000
To: grainbelt
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:34
Subject: Re: feedback
quit messaing me you are a pathetic stalker now and all of you crap is being reported to abuse

_________________
AFRO
***
From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:37
Subject: Re: feedback
dont worry i have all the pm's from you to
***
From: risk master2000
To: grainbelt
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:41
Subject: Re: feedback
that is fine Ido not care please quit harrassing me do not send me any more PM's if you have a problem with me take it up with the MODsw I have added you too my ignore and do not want any more contact with you please respect this and add this too your PM collection from me...

***
From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:56
Subject: Re: feedback
will do thanks now you can stop harrassing me also
***
Last edited by risk master2000 on Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby Sir. Ricco on Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:15 pm

Place on My Ignore List. I think that takes care of pms too.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Captain Sir. Ricco
 
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Making kingdoms burn and bloodshed start.

Postby risk master2000 on Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:31 pm

Sir. Ricco wrote:Place on My Ignore List. I think that takes care of pms too.
no he was alreay there when I started getting the PM's I wish it did though
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby risk master2000 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:20 am

Deleted horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored... Just a add on he has sent me a number of PM since this and states"From: grainbelt To: risk master2000 Posted: 21 Feb 2008 13:26 Subject: Re: feedback expect the same feedback for whining about a secret alliance , and doing the same thing then" in his same idiocy in regards to this game he will leave retalitory feedback , further proof this is not a smart guy... [edit]
grainbelt's response: hes is just mad because he lost....pointless feedback. He was in my area to get cards each round and so I attacked him each round, and he kept going after me also. Whos the idiot
Deleted by moderator for this reason: Not game related 1824491 grainbelt ( 121-3 )
2008



how is this not game related please someone help me with this
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby hecter on Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:49 am

You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Postby risk master2000 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:24 am

hecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is bolded
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby hecter on Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:36 am

risk master2000 wrote:
hecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is bolded

And what does that mean? To me, that looks like you're saying he's the second worst player on the site. Again, not game specific.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Postby risk master2000 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:50 am

hecter wrote:
risk master2000 wrote:
hecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is bolded

And what does that mean? To me, that looks like you're saying he's the second worst player on the site. Again, not game specific.
okay then lets practice english "goes for the #2 who is keeping #1 in check" and knowing that this is talking about a game what would you believe that implies come on use common sense
Last edited by risk master2000 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby kevin0023 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:36 pm

Wow, I think I am getting a headache trying to read that stuff. I would just let it go. We all come across people that don't play the exact way we want them to and maybe this guy was having a bad day. You were sending him just as many PM's as he was sending you and if anything you lured him into what he said.

Let it go and add him to your ignore list. You are not the first person to get harrasing PM's nor the last.
Sergeant kevin0023
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:36 am
Location: Michigan

Postby cisco2001 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:10 pm

It's very simple. You fill out a ticket and submit it along with a copy of the PM. The negative feedback will be removed. You put him on your ignore list and do not respond to his PM's. He'll get bored and move on.

However, what is so frustrating is how badly your post is written. I don't know how you expect anybody to understand what you're writing. I'm sure it makes sense to you but, I can assure you, it makes no sense to other readers. In the future, try to write logically and not write as if you were talking. Talking and writing are completely different. It's enough to give anyone a headache.

Cisco2001
User avatar
Major cisco2001
 
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Texas

Postby hecter on Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:20 pm

risk master2000 wrote:
hecter wrote:
risk master2000 wrote:
hecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is bolded

And what does that mean? To me, that looks like you're saying he's the second worst player on the site. Again, not game specific.
okay then lets practice english "goes for the #2 who is keeping #1 in check" and knowing that this is talking about a game what would you believe that implies come on use common sense

Let's try it again without having to interpret missing words and punctuation, shall we?

Here is what I read:
"He had horrible strategy. He goes to the number 2 spot of horrible strategists, but he's barely keeping the number 1 person in check [ie the number 1 person is staying at number 1]. He should be ignored."

Now, if that isn't what you meant, how about you go and edit your feedback so that it's in proper English and that people aren't forced to interpret what you mean, hmm? Grammar and punctuation are your friends if you wish to be understood. If you don't want to use them, don't go whining that you're feedback got deleted.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Postby wrestler1ump on Sat Feb 23, 2008 4:04 am

Here's my suggestion. Quit whining, stop abusing the cheating forum (even though that's what everybody does) and give him a satisfactory response.
Private 1st Class wrestler1ump
 
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:27 pm

Postby risk master2000 on Sat Feb 23, 2008 4:14 pm

no what was referenced was the game the individual kept attacking me the #2 player in the game who was keeping the #1 player or in laymens terms the person who was winnning in check or again in laymens terms from overwhelming all please learn basic speach patterns and quick statements it is fully applicable since what I described to most people means exactly what it says and is only refering to the game
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby TheShiningSun on Sat Feb 23, 2008 5:12 pm

Try this feedback

Has horrible strategy, purposely attacked the only player keeping the leader in check and threw the game. Never play with him

or something along those lines, it should be kept
Brigadier TheShiningSun
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 8:21 pm

Postby hecter on Sat Feb 23, 2008 8:08 pm

risk master2000 wrote:no what was referenced was the game the individual kept attacking me the #2 player in the game who was keeping the #1 player or in laymens terms the person who was winnning in check or again in laymens terms from overwhelming all please learn basic speach patterns and quick statements it is fully applicable since what I described to most people means exactly what it says and is only refering to the game

Look, as somebody has already pointed out to you, speech and writing are two fundamentally different things. You can't expect people to understand you if you write like you talk. Your feedback is unclear and open to misinterpretation and has been deleted. Your options are either edit it or quit whinging.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Postby grainbelt on Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:26 pm

man this guys goes through alot of trouble....I am not going to go through it all but I got just as many pm from him and I was just responding back. I first pm'ed him asking to remove pointless feedback. Anyone can go look at the game he was attacking me the same amount as I was attacking him and the other player took advantage of it plain and simple, he then blames me for his loss.

Some how some way the feedback go put back on me which is BS but oh well. This guy is a complete jerk
Cook grainbelt
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:50 am

Postby grainbelt on Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:28 pm

the other person in the game even said that I was just trying to break his bonus, which I was and I get left with this crap. frickin please........I will let his feedback speak for itself
Cook grainbelt
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:50 am

latest from him

Postby risk master2000 on Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:37 pm

From: grainbelt
To: risk master2000
Posted: 27 Feb 2008 07:28
Subject: Re: feedback
i can play like a little brat to...but another neg. feedback onto your 50 of them or whatever you have cant seem like to much since your used to getting them
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby risk master2000 on Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:54 pm

now please correct me if I am worng but retalitory feedback is not allowed and if a player is ignorant enough to warn in advance he is going to leave retalitory feedback then it is in the rules that it should be removed so why am I having a hard time with King Achilles abiding by these clear rules with the evidence being plentiful ???if there is some of criteria or something else needed please tell me.
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby risk master2000 on Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:32 pm

is there anything I am doing wrong?
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby hecter on Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:33 pm

Responding to his pms, I imagine.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class hecter
 
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor

Postby risk master2000 on Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:50 pm

hecter wrote:Responding to his pms, I imagine.
I quit responding to his PM's a while ago he still keeps sending though, I am more concerned about the zero response I am getting on a blatant retalitory fedback what more proof is needed on that
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby GabonX on Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:05 pm

Risk Master, I think you like the drama of arguing with people on this site. It doesn't actualy harm you or your account in any way to recieve PM's and you could just delete them instead of reading them, let alone posting them in these forums...

You already have 28 (should be more but you have gotten a number of negative feedbacks including mine deleted) negative feedback. This isn't a conspiracy against you, it is based on your actions. The reason you haven't gotten a response from the mods is probably because you have a bad record with them. I realised I was getting on their bad side when you and I were arguing and I let the issue drop because of it. You're like the energizer bunny, you just keep going, and going and...Well you know the slogan.

What exactly about these PM's is abusive? Anyone feel free to answer that one because I don't see how one person's comments are any worse than another. Risk Master left a negative feedback, this player responded to it. It's been going on since then and Risk Master seems to be having fun with it here.
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Postby risk master2000 on Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:52 am

GabonX wrote:Risk Master, I think you like the drama of arguing with people on this site. It doesn't actualy harm you or your account in any way to recieve PM's and you could just delete them instead of reading them, let alone posting them in these forums...

You already have 28 (should be more but you have gotten a number of negative feedbacks including mine deleted) negative feedback. This isn't a conspiracy against you, it is based on your actions. The reason you haven't gotten a response from the mods is probably because you have a bad record with them. I realised I was getting on their bad side when you and I were arguing and I let the issue drop because of it. You're like the energizer bunny, you just keep going, and going and...Well you know the slogan.

What exactly about these PM's is abusive? Anyone feel free to answer that one because I don't see how one person's comments are any worse than another. Risk Master left a negative feedback, this player responded to it. It's been going on since then and Risk Master seems to be having fun with it here.


the fact that his like yours was retalitory ids the problem he said it in his Pm's so while I know you have the added interest in this Gabon since by your record of retaliation you have had quite a few deleted feedbacks and your issues with me it makes you want to comment but it is not concerning you
Last edited by risk master2000 on Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
AFRO
User avatar
Lieutenant risk master2000
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:51 pm
Location: WESTSIDE

Postby greenoaks on Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:32 am

unless GabonX has had his forum privileges removed this is his business, all of our business. if you do not want it to be so do not post in an open forum.
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Next

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron