Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
no he was alreay there when I started getting the PM's I wish it did thoughSir. Ricco wrote:Place on My Ignore List. I think that takes care of pms too.
I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is boldedhecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
risk master2000 wrote:I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is boldedhecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
okay then lets practice english "goes for the #2 who is keeping #1 in check" and knowing that this is talking about a game what would you believe that implies come on use common sensehecter wrote:risk master2000 wrote:I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is boldedhecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
And what does that mean? To me, that looks like you're saying he's the second worst player on the site. Again, not game specific.
risk master2000 wrote:okay then lets practice english "goes for the #2 who is keeping #1 in check" and knowing that this is talking about a game what would you believe that implies come on use common sensehecter wrote:risk master2000 wrote:I afraid you are really wrong read closer"horrible strategy goes for the # 2 person that is barely keeping #1 in check must now be added to the ranks of the idiotic and ignored" notice what is boldedhecter wrote:You said nothing about the game in any way, shape or form other than "horrible strategy". I know that that doesn't tell me anything...
And what does that mean? To me, that looks like you're saying he's the second worst player on the site. Again, not game specific.
risk master2000 wrote:no what was referenced was the game the individual kept attacking me the #2 player in the game who was keeping the #1 player or in laymens terms the person who was winnning in check or again in laymens terms from overwhelming all please learn basic speach patterns and quick statements it is fully applicable since what I described to most people means exactly what it says and is only refering to the game
I quit responding to his PM's a while ago he still keeps sending though, I am more concerned about the zero response I am getting on a blatant retalitory fedback what more proof is needed on thathecter wrote:Responding to his pms, I imagine.
GabonX wrote:Risk Master, I think you like the drama of arguing with people on this site. It doesn't actualy harm you or your account in any way to recieve PM's and you could just delete them instead of reading them, let alone posting them in these forums...
You already have 28 (should be more but you have gotten a number of negative feedbacks including mine deleted) negative feedback. This isn't a conspiracy against you, it is based on your actions. The reason you haven't gotten a response from the mods is probably because you have a bad record with them. I realised I was getting on their bad side when you and I were arguing and I let the issue drop because of it. You're like the energizer bunny, you just keep going, and going and...Well you know the slogan.
What exactly about these PM's is abusive? Anyone feel free to answer that one because I don't see how one person's comments are any worse than another. Risk Master left a negative feedback, this player responded to it. It's been going on since then and Risk Master seems to be having fun with it here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users