A 3 strike rule
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A 3 strike rule
by Master Bush on Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:09 pm
For someone who makes 3 claims of cheating, and all 3 are cleared. Because clearly this person is just a poor loser, and is looking for a reason why they lost. Maybe a 2 week ban or something. Just thinking out loud.
"You know what they say about Love and War...."
"Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
"Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
-
Master Bush
- Posts: 2387
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:50 pm
by johnnyrotten on Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:40 pm
Think a little quieter then. 
Seriously though, I don't reckon it would be that good a rule, as it might discourage someone from reporting a suspected multi, even if it is a multi.
Seriously though, I don't reckon it would be that good a rule, as it might discourage someone from reporting a suspected multi, even if it is a multi.-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Location: Poole, England
by reverend_kyle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:41 pm
like johnny for example.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
-
reverend_kyle
- Posts: 9250
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
- Location: 1000 post club
by johnnyrotten on Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:58 pm
Yeah, like me. Although I probably have caught more multi's than anyone else...
-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Location: Poole, England
by reverend_kyle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:59 pm
thats the point.. youve caught alot of multis but youve probably been wrong 3 times...
its a good thing lack dismissed the accusation about us.. they might have caught on to our multiness.
its a good thing lack dismissed the accusation about us.. they might have caught on to our multiness.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
-
reverend_kyle
- Posts: 9250
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
- Location: 1000 post club
by Master Bush on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:00 pm
Ok then, maybe 5. If you are 0-5 calling out cheats, then a 2 week ban.
"You know what they say about Love and War...."
"Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
"Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
-
Master Bush
- Posts: 2387
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:50 pm
by johnnyrotten on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:02 pm
More than I can count (more than 5) 
Seriously, probably bordering on 25-30.
Seriously, probably bordering on 25-30.-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Location: Poole, England
I thought i would be closer to you, i think i have busted about 15.by reverend_kyle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:04 pm
Master Bush wrote:Ok then, maybe 5. If you are 0-5 calling out cheats, then a 2 week ban.
I think it should be if you are overly retarded about one then you get maybe a few days ban like accusing
owl lawyer and barbie..
or johnny rotten and kyle... ones that are so crazy even lack deletes the thread its so dumb.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
-
reverend_kyle
- Posts: 9250
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
- Location: 1000 post club
by johnnyrotten on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:04 pm
Plus some haven't been checked/ Twill couldn't be arsed to check them properly.
-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Location: Poole, England
by johnnyrotten on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:11 pm
johnnyrotten wrote:More than I can count (more than 5)
Actually, counting through and estimating that half the ones that werent checked/ not checked properly were multis (as i think they all were), then it's about 40-45.
-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Location: Poole, England
by reverend_kyle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:12 pm
you get really bored alot dont you johnny?
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
-
reverend_kyle
- Posts: 9250
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
- Location: 1000 post club
by johnnyrotten on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:13 pm
Yes. Especially when I have 2 and a half months off school.
-
johnnyrotten
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
- Location: Poole, England
by reverend_kyle on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:15 pm
have you been checking more and more becuase the longest thread has gotten so uber lame.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
-
reverend_kyle
- Posts: 9250
- Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
- Location: 1000 post club
by mightyal on Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:38 pm
I don't get it. How can anyone care enough about their risk score that they cheat? And if rotten and ak have busted 40 between them, there must be 100s. So bizarre.
If there was money involved, I could understand...
If there was money involved, I could understand...
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use."
- Galileo Galilei
- Galileo Galilei
-
mightyal
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:33 pm
- Location: Banging the hag whilst Owl is busy banging hendy's mum
by gavin_sidhu on Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:29 am
reverend_kyle wrote:people are bizarre.
totally agree. I mean look at all those people who play landgrab when Conquer Club is available.
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
-
gavin_sidhu
- Posts: 1428
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
|
|||||||
| Conquer Club is not associated with RISK online in any way. Copyright © 2006-2025 by Big Wham LLC | |||||||
