Page 1 of 1

48684 - ADMITTED "private" planning in singels gam

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:05 pm
by KoolBak
Lack / twill, My Darling wicked...these three newbies from Sweden (no dis against the country - just these three yankos) have essentially admitted to planning their private alliance / battle plans in swedish in the chat and claim it is ok as it is made public....as I cannot read swedish (which I have made clear), this breaks the rules. Pleeeeaaaase ban these meatsax from playing together.......

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:24 pm
by D.IsleRealBrown
Goodluck.

They wouldn't be band if they were multiaccounting. :roll:

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:33 pm
by Aladriel
D.IsleRealBrown wrote:Goodluck.

They wouldn't be band if they were multiaccounting. :roll:


They would be tied together??? That doesn't seem right.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:39 pm
by KoolBak
?? I do not understand the statement...but, I am not accusing of multi, but of rule # 2, private alliances......or more accurately, private planning within a stated alliance...just the same as pm'ing...not allowed....

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:24 am
by niMic
You know, they weren't really saying anything game-related in swedish, that I can see. The first thing, the one that you reacted to, was just a joke from one to the other about him sneaking up behind and killing everyone. Then they agreed, in game, that they should have an alliance against you two. Sure, it's not very honorable, but they haven't really done anything against the rules.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:52 am
by KoolBak
The thread months ago re: using a language in game chat not understood by all was ended by Lackattack....it was deemed "not cool" and essentially the same as planning via pm in a singles game.....

It will be over soon....never mind.......

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:03 pm
by disastrophy
KoolBak wrote:The thread months ago re: using a language in game chat not understood by all was ended by Lackattack....it was deemed "not cool" and essentially the same as planning via pm in a singles game.....

It will be over soon....never mind.......


What if they didnt speak english, then everyone is screwed.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:17 pm
by Phobia
disastrophy wrote:
KoolBak wrote:The thread months ago re: using a language in game chat not understood by all was ended by Lackattack....it was deemed "not cool" and essentially the same as planning via pm in a singles game.....

It will be over soon....never mind.......


What if they didnt speak english, then everyone is screwed.


but they do speak english...

wow koolio ive never seen you get in a massive stress like that in game chat! then again, it wasnt such a massive stress, just a complain ;)

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:54 pm
by nascarfan38124
:?: i havent read anywere were it said that you cant statagize through pms :?:

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:55 pm
by AK_iceman
Rule #2 of the site is no secret alliances. :roll:

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:50 pm
by nascarfan38124
i understand that but it said above that you cannot stratagize through pms

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:52 pm
by AK_iceman
Not when its a standard game. If its a team game its fine but if you have an alliance in a standard it has to be in game chat.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:33 pm
by nascarfan38124
ok i didnt know that was the accepted rule :oops: i have never heard that befor i will remember that thanks

Re: 48684 - ADMITTED "private" planning in singels

PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:03 am
by alster
KoolBak wrote:Lack / twill, My Darling wicked...these three newbies from Sweden (no dis against the country - just these three yankos) have essentially admitted to planning their private alliance / battle plans in swedish in the chat and claim it is ok as it is made public....as I cannot read swedish (which I have made clear), this breaks the rules. Pleeeeaaaase ban these meatsax from playing together.......


Ok KoolBak - I took a look at the game chat. Besides having the pleasure to read your bitch-ass reamrks about Swedes (you'll burn in hell for that), I translated the very few Swedish sentances from it. Nothing indicates any kind of alliance being made there, you're overreacting.

The grammar in the translation isn't exactly good. But, the original grammar was horrible, and I tried to make as a fair translation as possible.

The original game chat:
2006-07-30 08:39:33 - oz: i say im pretty fucked up and cornered here!! this is not working the way i wanted :( anybody want a secret alliance? :)
2006-07-30 08:40:40 - oz: fan josef jag tror du kommer att vinna detta, d lär du gö
2006-07-30 08:45:31 - drainyou: nej jag tror koolbak tar hem det
2006-07-30 08:45:52 - drainyou: men det går helt klart bättre än förut för mig..:)
2006-07-30 09:35:46 - oz: kanske men alla kommer enas mot honom o så smyger du upp bak vägen o stabar alla, så tror jag d slutar
2006-07-30 09:37:44 - oz: fan sitter här hos syrran i vbg å d åska som fan här igår så trodde att modemet hade pajjat, dom andra var inte hemma heller men när jag prata me dem idag så fick jag iaf igång det igen, JÄVLA ÅSKVÄDER!
2006-07-30 15:14:56 - drainyou: haha ja
2006-07-30 15:30:03 - drainyou: avve, vad händer? lever du?
2006-07-31 01:47:20 - KoolBak: Not cool guys.....
2006-07-31 01:51:45 - lusi: yeah not cool guys - bye
2006-07-31 02:11:47 - KoolBak: my meager swedish translation skills indicate you are talking about sneaking up some back way and directing questionable comments my way.....thanks, eh? Very nice....



Translation into English:
2006-07-30 08:39:33 - oz: i say im pretty fucked up and cornered here!! this is not working the way i wanted :( anybody want a secret alliance? :)
2006-07-30 08:40:40 - oz: damn josef I think you’ll win this, you’ll probably will...
2006-07-30 08:45:31 - drainyou: no I think koolbak will take it
2006-07-30 08:45:52 - drainyou: but it definitely goes better for me now than before..:)
2006-07-30 09:35:46 - oz: perhaps, but everyone will unite against him, and then you’ll probably sneak up and stabb all of us in the back, that’s how I think it’ll end
2006-07-30 09:37:44 - oz: damn, am sitting here at my sister’s place in “vbg” [Vårberg? – translator’s note.], there was a hell of a thunderstorm yesterday, I thought that my modem had broken down for a while, the other ones wasn’t at home either but when I talked to them today I got it started again. FUCKING THUNDERSTORM!
2006-07-30 15:14:56 - drainyou: haha yes
2006-07-30 15:30:03 - drainyou: avve, what’s going on? are you alive?
2006-07-31 01:47:20 - KoolBak: Not cool guys.....
2006-07-31 01:51:45 - lusi: yeah not cool guys - bye
2006-07-31 02:11:47 - KoolBak: my meager swedish translation skills indicate you are talking about sneaking up some back way and directing questionable comments my way.....thanks, eh? Very nice....


Nothing spectacular in other words.

Re: 48684 - ADMITTED "private" planning in singels

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:20 pm
by disastrophy
LOL, thats the funniest thing I've ever read, I never thought swedish small talk could piss someone off that much.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:18 am
by KoolBak
Hey alter-dumass....so nice to hear from you again...sigh.

First off, what "bitch-ass" comments are you referring to that I will burn in hell for? That I called three newbies yankovitches?? If that is the case, I will be seeing you there as well, yankovitch. By the way, stay the hell out of xi...another posting like that and you will be banned...it is a friendly place....

Finally, as usual, you do not comprehend the gripe.

1. They stated an alliance - fine.
2. They posted in a foreign language subsequent to that - not fine as determined by lack some time ago.

End of story - Go away.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:19 am
by alster
KoolBak wrote:Hey alter-dumass....so nice to hear from you again...sigh.

First off, what "bitch-ass" comments are you referring to that I will burn in hell for? That I called three newbies yankovitches?? If that is the case, I will be seeing you there as well, yankovitch. By the way, stay the hell out of xi...another posting like that and you will be banned...it is a friendly place....

Finally, as usual, you do not comprehend the gripe.

1. They stated an alliance - fine.
2. They posted in a foreign language subsequent to that - not fine as determined by lack some time ago.

End of story - Go away.


1. The hell reference was meant as a joke. A rather dry sense of humor admittedly, but it was not meant as anything more than a joke.
2. The "bitch-ass" comment reference was a rather crude (and maybe rude) reference to your colorful language in the game chat. Colorful language is of course not prohibited in the game chat, but if one resorts to it one cannot expect that it goes unanswered. However, I should perhaps not have made that comment here in the Cheating&Abuse forum. My apologies.
3. With regard to that xi forum. Well, excuse me your highness, but I was invited to it since I’m part of the Tribal Wars xi/CC clan. However, you don't have to worry since I really have no intention to be active in the CC forum there (I have enough to do in the tribal wars forum). But, I couldn’t help notice that you hanged those guys out to dry in there. I just clarified it in a friendly way.

4. They stated openly in English that they entered into an alliance. That is perfectly alright. Even though I personally dislike alliances and are pissed off when I see them, it's not a ground to file a Cheating&Abuse report.
5. They wrote some small talk sentences in Swedish in the game chat that had nothing to do with entering into an alliance. The alliance came after that small talk. Nothing wrong or prohibited there.
6. The end of story is that your accusation seems to be unfounded. At least no secret alliance was made in the game chat. Of course, such an alliance could have been discussed through pm's. But that we don't know. There's really no reason for you to be pissed off at those guys. You simply misunderstood their small talk.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:46 am
by KoolBak
You are right; I am wrong - my apologies.

Can we pleeeeaase drop it?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:00 pm
by alster
KoolBak wrote:You are right; I am wrong - my apologies.

Can we pleeeeaase drop it?


No worries. :D

Consider the issue droped on my part.

Re: 48684 - ADMITTED "private" planning in singels

PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:52 pm
by shinmen
[quote]2006-07-30 08:39:33 - oz: i say im pretty fucked up and cornered here!! this is not working the way i wanted :( anybody want a secret alliance? :)

Maybe the swedish are innocent, -normaly they are-, but it is not very cleaver start talking your own language afther to say this, and it is easy for others think like koolbak, and it is not very cleaver say anything in english when koolbak complains. This is like be near to an homicide and take the knife.

Alster, you begin again with your long long threads with lot of numbers?
Do you have nothing to do in real life?

PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:11 pm
by AK_iceman
alstergren wrote:
KoolBak wrote:You are right; I am wrong - my apologies.

Can we pleeeeaase drop it?


No worries. :D

Consider the issue droped on my part.

Just let it go shinmen..... let it go. :wink: