ginshrac, Zorb15 - secret alliance [noted]

[pat_wobbly]

Suspect users: ginshrac, Zorb15

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1624261

Comments: ginshrac and Zorb15 would not attack each other unless it proved needed for completing a territory and both players didn't bulk up on each others border with armies to protect themselves during the game until I made a comment about it. At one point both players talk at roughly the same time just after the other player finishes their move even though the sequential turns are different. One person came to chat in game 35 seconds after the other player finished their comment.

2008-01-25 23:35:44 - ginshrac gets a card

2008-01-25 23:36:07 - ginshrac: Well I'm sorry upset you but that is the name of the game red.
2008-01-25 23:36:42 - Zorb15: thats right

If they wanted to play doubles they should have joined a doubles game.

Thx
pat_wobbly

[sully800]

Suspect users: ginshrac, Zorb15

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1624261

Comments: ginshrac and Zorb15 would not attack each other unless it proved needed for completing a territory and both players didn't bulk up on each others border with armies to protect themselves during the game until I made a comment about it. At one point both players talk at roughly the same time just after the other player finishes their move even though the sequential turns are different. One person came to chat in game 35 seconds after the other player finished their comment.

2008-01-25 23:35:44 - ginshrac gets a card

2008-01-25 23:36:07 - ginshrac: Well I'm sorry upset you but that is the name of the game red.
2008-01-25 23:36:42 - Zorb15: thats right

If they wanted to play doubles they should have joined a doubles game.

Thx
pat_wobbly

Thanks for the report, but to prove a secret alliance we need evidence from at least two games. It's possible you could be correct, but its also possible that this was just an isolated incident and they weren't working together.