Page 1 of 1
Holysox and lord levi [public alliance]
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:27 am
by Blue Geers
Alliance in 3 player game
users: Holysox and lord levi
Game number:
http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1398041
Comments: The game normally attacked each other until lord levi suggest one to alliance to eliminate one to fasten the game as his own unreasonable reason. I ignore lord levi's wording by Holysox make alliance to eliminate me. At that moment, all of us had a balance armies. This action is very unfair in 3 player game.
Blue geers
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:06 am
by TeeGee
It might appear unfair, but they announced it as required by the rules.
There is no rule at CC to say 2 players can't form an alliance in a 3 player game. Alliances are part of CC and something we all have to live with, whether we agree or disagree with them.
If you don't like there tactics, all you can do is add them to your ignore list and you will never have to play them again
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:00 am
by skaterchild3
it is quite normal for an alliance in a 3 player game to be formed if one player get's to powerful, normally it's until they force him down a bit to mkae it even.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:04 pm
by Blue Geers
Ok thank you, I think the unfairness is because we have a balance armies and someone suggest alliance. If the case that 2 player make alliance with notice in the beginning, I think this is not the 3 player game.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:12 pm
by Blue Geers
skaterchild3, I am agreed with you that it is a normal case if one is obviously powerful and 2 player make alliance. But in this game, 3 of us have even armies and no one is powerful. The reason for the alliance is that one need to fasten the game as his own unreasonable excuse. I think their alliance is worse than the secret alliance.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:33 pm
by kingprawn
No matter how unfair you think the alliance is if it has been stated in chat then they have done nothing wrong. It happens all the time.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:29 am
by sully800
It's a good case for negative feedback and ignore list, because many people wouldn't like to play against opponents like that.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:22 am
by Blue Geers
what i can do is now put them in my ignore list, thank you!
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:20 am
by Blue Geers
For this unfair game, I let another one also lose the game. In other words, there are 2 players include I have negative feeling.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:10 am
by jpcloet
Interesting argument. You did miss only 1 turn and the excuse of "hurry up, my wife is pregnant" is kind of lame. You do have a right to be upset.
I'm going to assume that he's known about this for sometime. I would suggest either honorably tanking the game or only joining speed games if you're in a hurry.
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:00 am
by Snorri1234
jpcloet wrote:Interesting argument. You did miss only 1 turn and the excuse of "hurry up, my wife is pregnant" is kind of lame. You do have a right to be upset.
Oh man, I'm gonna use that as an excuse in all my games from now on.