Conquer Club

Posted: **Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:07 pm**

Subject line: TemeculaDave/Bubbatc

These are suspected secret alliances

Suspect users: TemeculaDave/Bubbatc

Game number:

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1178017

Comments: TemeculaDave is pretty cool and ive played with him before. i know he doesnt have mulitple accounts but i felt like Bubbatc was helping him by weakening both of us so TemeculaDave could just clean up and win. then i saw other games they played and at least BubbaTc or Temeculadave win each game of all the games they have played together. kind of suspicious to me. I dont mean to snitch but i think its unfair.

Posted: **Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:09 pm**

I want to have an alliance with you, sweet'ums...

Posted: **Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:15 pm**

Anarkistsdream wrote:I want to have an alliance with you, sweet'ums...

LOL, somebody has a crush. :lol:

Posted: **Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:15 pm**

Strife wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:I want to have an alliance with you, sweet'ums...
LOL, somebody has a crush.

I do to

Posted: **Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:21 pm**

omg you guys :oops:

Posted: **Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:45 pm**

txbonita06 wrote:omg you guys

Tsk, tsk, no online threesomes. [-X

Posted: **Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:46 pm**

Strife wrote:
txbonita06 wrote:omg you guys
Tsk, tsk, no online threesomes.

Your right...I get her :wink:

Posted: **Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:11 am**

to me its weird that the only games they played together they each won. dave won two and bubbatc won two

Posted: **Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:48 am**

First, I have checked TemeculaDave and this is the first time he has been reported for a secret alliance. To prove a secret alliance you'll have to provide evidence from multiple games to show that its a pattern. Otherwise, it is pretty hard to prove from one single game. As for the other player, bubbatc, he/she has been reported before but with different players:

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... ht=bubbatc
and
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... ht=bubbatc

So on record, this is his third time to be reported with a different player, thus questioning his game style or strategy. Feel free to leave a feedback about it to warn others, supported with facts from the game. Thank you for the report and this case is noted.

Posted: **Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:24 am**

soundout9 wrote:
Strife wrote:
txbonita06 wrote:omg you guys
Tsk, tsk, no online threesomes.

Your right...I get her

now ay dude. i was here WAY b4 all of you :lol:

Posted: **Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:29 pm**

1181039
1130458
1105729
1101772
then my game which was 1178017
those are the game numbers

Posted: **Tue Nov 27, 2007 10:41 am**

i posted the game numbers. in case you missed this

Posted: **Tue Nov 27, 2007 12:41 pm**

Strife wrote:
txbonita06 wrote:omg you guys
Tsk, tsk, no online threesomes.

Lets make it a foursome then...

I have a crush as well

Posted: **Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:24 pm**

yall are off topic lol im really trying to do something about these guys! lol

Posted: **Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:32 pm**

king achilles wrote:Feel free to leave a feedback about it to warn others, supported with facts from the game. Thank you for the report and this case is noted.

I recommend you take his advice, and leave him a neg. I just took a quick look at his feedback and he doesn't seem like a pleasant player... You might also want to add him to your ignore list so you don't have to play him again. That will help you and the other people who read his feedback.

Posted: **Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:38 pm**

like anyone really pays attention to that and like that will stop them from playing with each other lol well whatever i guess its whatever

Posted: **Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:43 pm**

txbonita06 wrote:like anyone really pays attention to that and like that will stop them from playing with each other lol well whatever i guess its whatever

People read negs. I often do, in fact. If a player I'm playing with has a negative feedback(s) I say to myself "Now what did he do to deserve that?" and go and check it out. If lots of people start thinking the same thing, the feedback accumulates and then WABAAM! bannage.

Posted: **Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:48 pm**

edwinissweet wrote:
soundout9 wrote:
Strife wrote:
txbonita06 wrote:omg you guys
Tsk, tsk, no online threesomes.

Your right...I get her

now ay dude. i was here WAY b4 all of you

I have been here for 9 days before you so i get to chose...

and the winner is.......*drum roll* KWANTON!!!!!

Posted: **Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:25 pm**

She's getting bitchy because she didn't prevent her boyfriend from getting killed.

Posted: **Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:05 pm**

Wrestler1ump blathered:

"She's getting bitchy because she didn't prevent her boyfriend from getting killed."

If that post by Whump doesn't get a mod's attention and some form of penalty for Whump, then you are all ball-less blowhards

Time to lock 'er down as well as Whump!

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:02 pm**

this thread needs to be locked. something needs to be done about hump

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:04 pm**

txbonita06 wrote:this thread needs to be locked. something needs to be done about hump

I concur.

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:25 pm**

txbonita06 wrote:this thread needs to be locked. something needs to be done about hump

I've pmed Twill, hopefully I'll be able to talk a bit of sense into him...

Posted: **Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:57 pm**

Wump, we're having words.

Now.

Conquer Club

secret alliance [noted]

secret alliance [noted]