Throughout this game, members "wrongwayrebekah" and "princessdella" have consistently engaged in minimal efforts against each other, ignoring wide open opportunities to gain significant territory with little risk, while pursuing other, more heavily protected opponents. That's fine with me if they had openly declared such an alliance in the chat. Yet neither has once posted anything in the chat, even after questions. I suspect that private communication or pre-game planning has gone on in violation of Conquer Club's stated rules. Please take a look at this game and give me an assessment. If I am wrong, I will accept that. But it looks fishy to me.
Example: On her last move, wrongwayrebekah (green) invaded North America with over 46 armies in the face of no opposition from princessdella (yellow), yet stopped without pursuing the continent, which could have easily been secured. In the previous turn, princessdella (yellow), with 30 armies on Brazil, ignored Africa, held by wrongwayrebekah (green) with only 1 army on each territory— and with the only threatening force of green's being 11 armies in Southern Europe. Instead, yellow took most of North America and invaded Asia (through a protecting force of 13 armies), marching down to Siam— yet ignored 38 armies of green located on Greenland, not bothering to significantly protect against these in any real way. Neither of these moves make any sense to me unless the two are in collusion, yet again, no such alliance has been stated in the chat.
I would like an independent judgment on this matter.
