Conquer Club

Game 39615 mid game alliance. It is written on the game chat. Cheating because they cant accept defeat

While there's nothing illegal about an announced alliance. xfatalassasinx was busted for being a multi a while back.

they were unanounced at the beginning of the game and just wrote that 2 be protected

Yes, i just looked at the game that definately was a secret alliance.

thank you something needs to be done.

Yes definitely an unannounced alliance in game 39615. Acehawk89 has had previous unannounced alliances also against me, GTFAN2188, and Oustormypetrel as well.

another incident game 39640 same thing.

It is so obvious please have them banned

I'm not going to say any thing about the secret alliance. it may have been there and it might not. ok but if you get into a 3 man game you need to believe that they are both gonna be against you because there can only be one winner. Please play a 5 man game not a 3 man because in a 3 man game there is more of a chance for cheating and secret alliances than any other game

I get what u are sayin but it is nonetheless completly illegal.

Sorry for the trouble. There was no alliance. I broke the southern continent from Fatal, then he broke the yellow greek continent from me, then we allied because OU has 2 continents and broke both of our continents. We announced our alliance but due to being complete enemies earlier in the game, we had weakened each other too much to come back even with the alliance and OU went on to win.



In our next classic game. My first 2 attacks were on Fatal, then I attacked OU to get a connected empire before making my fortifications so I could transfer all of my Europe and Asia men to Siam. OU then attacked my Oceana terretories with his Oceana terretories and lost leaving him with 2 terretorries with 1 army each, so Obviously I took all of Oceana. I then went on to Attack Fatal's Africa and move 4 men in in order to make sure he didn't get control of 2 continents.

Now notice how Fatal and OU have hardly attacked each other, and I have attacked Fatal more than OU and taken out more of Fatal's men than OU's men. I'm not suggesting they have an alliance but I think it is blatently obvious that there are no alliance at all and OU is victimizing himself after getting stuck with bad terretorries.

h2006-07-01 02:25:13 - OUStormyPetrel receives 3 armies for 10 territories
2006-07-01 02:26:36 - OUStormyPetrel deployed 3 armies on Yakutsk
2006-07-01 02:27:44 - OUStormyPetrel fortified Quebec with 9 armies from Central America

how's this for an unwritten alliance? Fatal has all of SA and Africa and has 8 in Venezula. OU has almost all of NA, yet he still moves his 10 armies in Central America to Quebec. Then incredibly, Venezuala doesn't attack central 8v1, but instead also tacticals away.

Ferraz Shawmut

im just kidding, please dont ban me or anything im a good friend of AHawk, but sometimes he can form alliances agaisnt his own friends and even his own brother

I got destroyed both games. I don't see how I sectretly allied in the first game or allied at all in the second game. In the first game I allied because petrel had a strength rating that was about 40 higher than me and fatal combined.

I was the one who got double teamed in the second game. OU had all of NA and Fatal had all of SA and Africa. I had Asia Europe and Australia. Then suddenly OU and fatal move all their men away from the central/venezuela border to attack me with and leave that border with 1 army each. At least they could admit to allying in the chat or something.

When one player has Europe, Asia, and Oceania its more common sense for the remaining players to attack them. Anything less would be suicide.

I didn't have all of asia. My bad. Just oceana and Europe, but that isn't my point. They should have annonced the alliance, and they accused me of allying.

He's saying that it wasn't a real alliance it was what they needed to do to win.

I'm saying that I shouldn't be the one accused of cheating. They did more teamwork than me, so this thread is a false accusation.