Page 1 of 1

OREMUS and The Mad Butcher [ka]

PostPosted: Sun Oct 08, 2023 6:37 pm
by Flyswatter
Accused:

OREMUS
The Mad Butcher



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy



Game number(s):

Game 22765293



Comments: I'm currently in the above game with the two players mentioned above, and a fourth player also. I just felt the quick rate at which my territories were taken out so early in the game by those two players (I was down to one territory by round 3) seemed deliberately targeted so I ran a search with the two players and found they have played in 152 other games together, with the vast number of wins going to OREMUS. If you wouldn't mind taking a look, many thanks.

Re: OREMUS and The Mad Butcher [ka]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 9:10 pm
by king achilles
This is the first time they have been reported for a possible secret diplomacy. For now, I would need more than just this game alone to help prove a possible secret alliance. For now, I will note this report for future reference in case they get reported again in the future. Feel free to put them in your Foe list and rate them accordingly.

Re: OREMUS and The Mad Butcher [ka]

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2023 7:34 pm
by Flyswatter
Thanks for having a look into this. I was referring moreso to the number of games they have played together, and the skewed stats for these rather than just the game I was in.

I have gone through the other 152 games and tallied the numbers as follows:

OREMUS - 93 wins (61%)
The Mad Butcher - 33 wins (22%)
Everyone else in those games - 26 wins (17%)

Furthermore, of the games won by either of those two, 104 out of 112 (93%) ended with those two being the final players left in the game and one eliminating the other for the win. (I have not included Assassin type games in the figures for obvious reasons).

I also note some comments made by other players in the games below which suggest perhaps some non-standard tactics at play:

22330595
22423967

I'll leave it to you to determine but I'd suggest there are some genuine irregularities in the numbers above. Many thanks.