you are in charge, but normally Multi's are stopped, finito, and kicked from all games. I think you should rethink that part, because you let him earn extra points as a Cook when he sure doesn't play like a cook. He's a wolf in sheep's clothing
How can't you see this sentence makes no sense ?
What kind of extra points is he going to earn as a cook ? Once he earned the extra points, he'll stop getting extra points because he won't be a cook anymore.
Thus why do you think he is a cook ?
Do you think he first lose points on purpose to be a cook, to then play like a major so that he can get extra points, that he will then lose again to be a cook ?
If the issue is a multi, be aware that a new account start with 1000 points.
If he was just a multi with 1000 points, he would have more points than now, that'd be better for you then huh ?
So, I'm trying to follow you train of thoughs
The guy is a multi - create a new account with 1000 points, but in reality he is an "experienced" player, and doesn't play like a guy with 1000 points.
But somehow he lose points and become a cook (??)
Then he start being a wolf in sheep's clothing - then that's an issue that deserve a C&A report because then he is stealing points.
The flaw here is, if he was good, when he started his multi account with 1000 points, he would be winning more points, not become a cook.
Got it ?
And that's just one part of the flaw of your reasoning, because as far as I am concerned, even a general starting at a 1000 points isn't an issue.
Because points fluctuate for everyone and even a general starting a multi account wouldn't be stealing that much points from you that it would hurt anything.
That's the main reason I replied to you in the first place, because the reasoning saying we shouldn't allow people to create new account because that is unfair for their opponent point wise is imho, utterly stupid.
Why do I think it's stupid ? well, in your last reply to me you said :
2-you might not care to lose 50 instead of 30, but I do. It's like you wouldn't care if someone stole $100 from your wallet, but I do.
The BIG difference with money is, if someone steal 100$ from my wallet, I'm not going to be earning more because of what I lost. Me losing 100$ won't change my income, thus it's a loss.
If I lose 30 points instead of 50 in a game, my next win, I'm going to win more points, and also the next time I lose a game, I'm going to lose less points.
So me losing 30 points instead of 50, or even a 100 instead of 10, doesn't matter that much if it just one game, because the other 30 games I'm playing are going to compensate that, since I'm going to win more points on each victory after that, and lose less points in each defeat after that.
So your rank should be stable around your level of skill no matter if one cook playing like a major suddenly beat you once.
And, of course, people have said it before, and it didn't matter to me because that's not the point I'm arguing ( I'm arguing points are so irrelevant for this situation), but Dragon Rida is really a cook deserve to be a cook and will always be a cook.
Him being busted has nothing do to with his rank..