Conquer Club

Accused:

EBConquer




The accused are suspected of:


Other: This person has a signature that depicts a woman being violently subdued and beaten.




Comments:

I wasn't even allowed to have an avatar of a tomato but somehow this is allowed? Just another example of how the moderators are above the law.

It also has an anthropomorphic image of a piece of tofu with a massive erection (probably).

Actually that is all kinds of f'd up. Not sure why it's not an easy one to deal with without the mod piss takes.

Nothing wrong with a little mild spanking. Oh and men get spanked too.

Keefie wrote:Nothing wrong with a little mild spanking. Oh and men get spanked too.

So this is closed? CC is going to allow this signature? Promoting violence against women is okay at CC?

demonfork wrote:

Keefie wrote:Nothing wrong with a little mild spanking. Oh and men get spanked too.

So this is closed? CC is going to allow this signature? Promoting violence against women is okay at CC?

Keefie is not a C&A mod. So no, this is not closed.

TheForgivenOne wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Keefie wrote:Nothing wrong with a little mild spanking. Oh and men get spanked too.

So this is closed? CC is going to allow this signature? Promoting violence against women is okay at CC?

Keefie is not a C&A mod. So no, this is not closed.

So does every other current case, besides this one, have a status? & even the ones that were started after this case?

I'm a bit surprised that after having this sig for 9 years, it has now become a problem especially w/ OP's location of "at your mother's house".

This was a copy from a vintage ad where I made a play on words. Something along the lines of "Your moms house", much like the wall on the OP.

To be honest, nobody would bat an eye if my name didn't have color. So much for helping the community i suppose.

Surely Demonfork and Symmetry can realize that this is a play on words and has nothing to do w/ beating a woman? lol.

Give me a break you guys. This is a joke right?

Woah, mind. blown. I thought this was a feminist ad supporting a woman's right to choose.

I switched up my sig after 9 years since some of you seem pretty bothered by it.

My original may be back, but not after the Weiner leaves your moms house. lol

I nominate this thread for Post of the Year.

Huh. Well, EB is my friend and clanmate, so I am for sure biased, but I am also female. I take no offense at his sig. There are quite a few sigs I have seen on CC that actually are offensive to me, for one reason or another. I'm hoping this was a joke, and I didn't get it, but if it's serious, well, this is my serious comment on the charges.

I have reported directly to admin a sig that was subjective showing “oranges” and was told the Global Mods found no offense from it, can’t display the member’s name since she has it change since but I’m sure she will display it again.

Seeing this C&A makes me laughing....If Mods would acknowledge and confirm EB’s sig is inappropriate I would call it BS and remove my colored name.

EB, you have no reason to change your sig to my opinion.

People get offended too damn easy these days. You know what offends me? People complaining about being offended...so if we could all just stop it'd be good.

This was worth it just to see EB's new Sig (Well done Sir).

Good lord....political correctness has now infected an online game.
Being offended is a construct and a choice. Somehow, people have now decided they have a RIGHT not to be offended.
The world has a lot of problems. A humorous picture of someone being spanked is certainly not one of them. Go virtue signal somewhere else please.

EBConquer wrote:I switched up my sig after 9 years since some of you seem pretty bothered by it.

My original may be back, but not after the Weiner leaves your moms house. lol

I'm not at all bothered by it. I'm bothered by the double standard at CC where mods can get away with shit that the rest of us don't.

You see prior to my current hot dog avatar I had an avatar of a tomato, but fucking king achilles FORCED me to change it.

This was my avatar that fuck-stick made me change.




So tell me, why should you get to keep your shit when I was forced to change mine?

That's your argument? They did it to me so they should do it to them?

And what about gender equality? I saw a person spanking a person. You saw a woman being spanked, would it have been ok if it was a man being spanked?

Sounds to me like you're full of shit.

Lx

yes, i agree w/df that KA made a bad call on this one.

Lindax wrote:That's your argument? They did it to me so they should do it to them?

And what about gender equality? I saw a person spanking a person. You saw a woman being spanked, would it have been ok if it was a man being spanked?

Sounds to me like you're full of shit.

Lx

No, it wouldn't have been okay, according to the precedent that has already been set.

In the end I just want consistency.

If that makes me full of shit then so be it.

demonfork wrote:

Lindax wrote:That's your argument? They did it to me so they should do it to them?

And what about gender equality? I saw a person spanking a person. You saw a woman being spanked, would it have been ok if it was a man being spanked?

Sounds to me like you're full of shit.

Lx

No, it wouldn't have been okay, according to the precedent that has already been set.

In the end I just want consistency.

If that makes me full of shit then so be it.

Dude, you really think you are comparing Apple to Apple here? Your avatar was a nude subjective image...

of a tomato...

Mad777 wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Lindax wrote:That's your argument? They did it to me so they should do it to them?

And what about gender equality? I saw a person spanking a person. You saw a woman being spanked, would it have been ok if it was a man being spanked?

Sounds to me like you're full of shit.

Lx

No, it wouldn't have been okay, according to the precedent that has already been set.

In the end I just want consistency.

If that makes me full of shit then so be it.

Dude, you really think you are comparing Apple to Apple here? Your avatar was a nude subjective image...

You're an idiot.

but you're right it's not a fair comparison. my avatar was a pic of a piece of fruit & EB's is violence against women.

You think that a piece of fruit should not be allowed but promoting violence against women is okay?

demonfork wrote:

Mad777 wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Lindax wrote:That's your argument? They did it to me so they should do it to them?

And what about gender equality? I saw a person spanking a person. You saw a woman being spanked, would it have been ok if it was a man being spanked?

Sounds to me like you're full of shit.

Lx

No, it wouldn't have been okay, according to the precedent that has already been set.

In the end I just want consistency.

If that makes me full of shit then so be it.

Dude, you really think you are comparing Apple to Apple here? Your avatar was a nude subjective image...

You're an idiot.

sure, if this is making you feeling better...

go get some maturity and rethink about the purpose of you posting a C&A like this and based from your own experience about your avatar.