Conquer Club

Accused:
tfh182
Mokerslag


The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game number(s):
Game 18699870


Comments:
Stumbled on this by accident and followed up with Elaterate. Posting on his behalf. Clear secret diplomacy going on here. Pictures below from their walls as well as a pm sent to Elaterate as proof.

show: Pics from tfh182wall

show: Pics from Mokerslag wall

show: PM from Mokerslag to Elaterate

this is only advise no secret diplomacy, ididnt say to you attack him or someone else. I dont get it you made it like this far? did i say to Tfh what is against the rules? NO IS THE ANSWER!!

post mail is a no no..tfh may have walled to much.

busted cold...

Not sure why they are still digging but here is another wall message. Added to OP.

tfh182 and Mokerslag have been blocked from playing together in any future games

F..... stupied is this, tfh182 makes just a joke, he walled me , do you guys not read what i've walled him, put youre glasses on TeeGee, i did not say anything to him to do what is secret diplomacy in a game, he just say i did all what you have said, ok what did i say to him ? Nothing secrect, this is really perphetic! He is just joking and he walls to much! I don't know where you went to school but this is really poor thinking of you! Judge Judy wi'll just say don't be a prick. Cheap charges.

Imagine calling someone perphetic and then questioning their education in the very next sentence.

Scuse me, Can this report be archived and C&A cleared? Be nice to see nothing in forums about any report, And see how long it stays cleared!? Be good people!! Happy Holidays!! ")>

MagnusGreeol wrote:Scuse me, Can this report be archived and C&A cleared? Be nice to see nothing in forums about any report, And see how long it stays cleared!? Be good people!! Happy Holidays!! ")>

There are many around these parts who like nothing better than a full C&A full of juicy reports

Can't please all the people

I just think its rude and uncalled for to leave this up in the forums for all to see after judgement had been past? imo.

It is closed and archived

IcePack wrote:It is closed and archived

I thought "archived" meant out of sight from Forum?

yeah - bring on the next wave of rule breakers, pls.

MagnusGreeol wrote:

IcePack wrote:It is closed and archived

I thought "archived" meant out of sight from Forum?

No, it means it’s moved to the archives. Archived cases are all viewable so people can learn rulings from the past etc. however once archived they aren’t posted anymore usually, and new cases show up.

But by posting in this thread, it keeps coming up as the most recent so you can view it and is highlighted on the page from recent activity

MagnusGreeol wrote:

IcePack wrote:It is closed and archived

I thought "archived" meant out of sight from Forum?

Archives wouldn't be much use if they weren't available for reference.

Its a difficult thing to remove the names? Don't believe Mokes & tfh deserve to have their names plastered here for 3 months? If there are no new reports, I ask why can't the heading be changed to just " ARCHIVED C&A REPORTS?". Like to see how long it stays that way? ")> No war on it, just asking?

\MGM/

[edit]- sorry, 3 weeks! Can we please clear it before New Years? ")>

MagnusGreeol wrote:Its a difficult thing to remove the names? Don't believe Mokes & tfh deserve to have their names plastered here for 3 months? If there are no new reports, I ask why can't the heading be changed to just " ARCHIVED C&A REPORTS?". Like to see how long it stays that way? ")> No war on it, just asking?

\MGM/

[edit]- sorry, 3 weeks! Can we please clear it before New Years? ")>

Changing the title makes it harder to search for / find previous cases in the archives later on. There’s no reason to do it, their names are being “plastered”, it’s simply waiting for the next report(s). It’s been this way forever and many people have experienced it. Not a big deal and ironically the continued posting trying to get it changed only keeps it around longer.

MagnusGreeol wrote:Its a difficult thing to remove the names? Don't believe Mokes & tfh deserve to have their names plastered here for 3 months? If there are no new reports, I ask why can't the heading be changed to just " ARCHIVED C&A REPORTS?". Like to see how long it stays that way? ")> No war on it, just asking?

\MGM/

[edit]- sorry, 3 weeks! Can we please clear it before New Years? ")>

I can go down to the courthouse and read transcripts of suits that were brought before the court 100 years ago. Why would it be different anywhere else? The whole point of transparency is that cases are available to be read and studied at any point in the future.

Dukasaur wrote:

MagnusGreeol wrote:Its a difficult thing to remove the names? Don't believe Mokes & tfh deserve to have their names plastered here for 3 months? If there are no new reports, I ask why can't the heading be changed to just " ARCHIVED C&A REPORTS?". Like to see how long it stays that way? ")> No war on it, just asking?

\MGM/

[edit]- sorry, 3 weeks! Can we please clear it before New Years? ")>

I can go down to the courthouse and read transcripts of suits that were brought before the court 100 years ago. Why would it be different anywhere else? The whole point of transparency is that cases are available to be read and studied at any point in the future.

Yes, But in each case in the courthouse, Once the case has been judged, It is logged and archived, Not even the next day unless you go into archives, Will you see the same case posted, It would be archived, and the next case would be presented, then judged, then archived, Never will that same case be brought forth or seen, Until next offense?


[edit]- Or unless one goes into archives.

MagnusGreeol wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

MagnusGreeol wrote:Its a difficult thing to remove the names? Don't believe Mokes & tfh deserve to have their names plastered here for 3 months? If there are no new reports, I ask why can't the heading be changed to just " ARCHIVED C&A REPORTS?". Like to see how long it stays that way? ")> No war on it, just asking?

\MGM/

[edit]- sorry, 3 weeks! Can we please clear it before New Years? ")>

I can go down to the courthouse and read transcripts of suits that were brought before the court 100 years ago. Why would it be different anywhere else? The whole point of transparency is that cases are available to be read and studied at any point in the future.

Yes, But in each case in the courthouse, Once the case has been judged, It is logged and archived, Not even the next day unless you go into archives, Will you see the same case posted, It would be archived, and the next case would be presented, then judged, then archived, Never will that same case be brought forth or seen, Until next offense?

I'm not sure what you're saying. In most places you can look at archival records any time you want. There are exceptions, sure, but in most cases archives are available to be looked at any time.

I think Mags is just picking stupid arguments wherever he can as a kind of Christmas celebration.

Dukasaur wrote:

MagnusGreeol wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

MagnusGreeol wrote:Its a difficult thing to remove the names? Don't believe Mokes & tfh deserve to have their names plastered here for 3 months? If there are no new reports, I ask why can't the heading be changed to just " ARCHIVED C&A REPORTS?". Like to see how long it stays that way? ")> No war on it, just asking?

\MGM/

[edit]- sorry, 3 weeks! Can we please clear it before New Years? ")>

I can go down to the courthouse and read transcripts of suits that were brought before the court 100 years ago. Why would it be different anywhere else? The whole point of transparency is that cases are available to be read and studied at any point in the future.

Yes, But in each case in the courthouse, Once the case has been judged, It is logged and archived, Not even the next day unless you go into archives, Will you see the same case posted, It would be archived, and the next case would be presented, then judged, then archived, Never will that same case be brought forth or seen, Until next offense?

I'm not sure what you're saying. In most places you can look at archival records any time you want. There are exceptions, sure, but in most cases archives are available to be looked at any time.

Not saying we don't have an archive, Of course we do, anyone can go there, Just saying not to keep the last case up forever until next case?? Can we clear the names of Moke and thf off and just have in the forums say [C&A ARCHIVE REPORTS]

Maybe if you stopped fucking posting the names of your low IQ friends wouldn't keep appearing.

iAmCaffeine wrote:I think Mags is just picking stupid arguments wherever he can as a kind of Christmas celebration.

Just asked if we could clear their names off the forum C&A list Caff, That's all I asked, Then came a hail storm like I was trying to re-write the book?