Conquer Club

Subject line: Evil Dimwit / Night Strike

/Secret Alliance (delete the one they are not)

Suspect users: Evil Dimwit / Night Strike

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=563586
Comments: Never really felt conspired against until this game green refuses to attack blue …………… either these guys conspired together or dimwit really is a dimwit.


Lurp

I have attacked Dimwit almost as much as I have lurp. I've kept Dimwit from gaining his continent but he has been unable to stop mine. He has been attacking me, but I've been in a dominant position all game. This is the first game we've played together. We had an entertaining chat with similar ranks, so we played a quick 1 v 1 and are now awaiting opponents for a doubles match. No need for an alliance on this game: I've had a dominating position from the beginning and have kept my borders fortified.

green attacked red6-7 in brazil when red owned brazil and blue owned asia and au and had a 4 border happened 3 times like i said no coersion then dimwit is a dimwit. LURP

You're just upset because you're losing. Get over yourself. This game's a fair fight and you really look dumb right now.

Besides, you're the one who got Brazil up to 20 armies when the territories bordering it were your own! And left Venezuela open for green's attack.

I've played a lot of games with Evil Dimwit, he has never played a game with Night Strike and I have never seen him have a secret alliance with anybody. I don't know Night Strike but I know Dim wouldn't have a secret alliance.

Well, all I have to say is that I acted with what I'd like to think is sound strategic intent. If that makes me a dimwit then I think it's a good niche for me.

The original post has been modified. What did it originally say?

How do you know it's been modified? It doesn't say anywhere that it's been edited, and I don't remember it saying anything different since I first saw this thread...

I have never seen him have a secret alliance with anybody

Well you wouldn't, that's why it's called a secret alliance

Seems like the only bad egg in this game is lurp, for trying to cast aspersions on other players when he's getting his ass whooped. All you've done is cuss and whinge about your bad luck in the game, which I've been known to do from time to time , but at least I don't create a thread in a cheating/abuse forum trying to smear their good names.

Evil DiMwit is my multi. ban him.

you look more evil than he does

debra79 wrote:you look more evil than he does

it's just to fool people. i'm actually nice and cuddly.

DiM wrote:

debra79 wrote:you look more evil than he does

it's just to fool people. i'm actually nice and cuddly.

its true . . DiM is cuddly.

/nods while slowly backing away

lurp wrote: /Secret Alliance (delete the one they are not)

That phrase is what made me wonder. But if posts normally state if they are edited, then I guess it doesn't matter.

Night Strike wrote:

lurp wrote: /Secret Alliance (delete the one they are not)

That phrase is what made me wonder. But if posts normally state if they are edited, then I guess it doesn't matter.

Read the sticky topic at the top of this forum, the one that says ***[OFFICIAL FORM] PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING. That should explain it.

yeah, lurp just copied and pasted the form you have to use, but as with other people who aren't adept at understanding how to use a form correctly, he didn't delete that part of his post.

Most times it says at the bottom of the post if it's been edited and when, and how many times, but not all the time.

debra79 wrote:Most times it says at the bottom of the post if it's been edited and when, and how many times, but not all the time.

as long as nobody posts after you, you can edit your post as many times as you want and it won't show. if someone posts after you then each editis counted and shown something like this:

Last edited by DiM on 26 Jun 2007 17:41; edited 3 times in total

Cheers!

Suspects: Evil Dimwit / Night Strike
Verdict: Cleared of secret alliance. Cleared of multiple accounts.