Conquer Club

Common sense prevails - if you are intentionally or continually making this community less enjoyable for others, you may be removed from it. It's that simple. This applies to any part of the site where interaction takes place; in Forums, Private Messages, Live Chat and Game Chat

BGtheBrain wrote:Accused:
PaulatPeace

The accused are suspected of:
Other: Violating community guidelines

Game number(s):
N/A

Comments:
Guidelines here: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7785

Common sense prevails - if you are intentionally or continually making this community less enjoyable for others, you may be removed from it. It's that simple. This applies to any part of the site where interaction takes place; in Forums, Private Messages, Live Chat and Game Chat

Making the clan world less enjoyable for others.
CL7 - TRUTH & INJUSTICE
SUCCESS - (often comes with negative side effects)
Message from IcePack to PaulatPeace & Reply
Deleting Posts & Threads
Clan Sitting Rules Discussion

Making the forum less enjoyable for others.
Defense Not Permitted (Lets Just Judge Him & Hang Him)
IcePack - Gross Abuse & Spamming
Sincere Question

Making the game less enjoyable for others:
PaulatPeace - gross abuse
Paulatpeace - The Ranching continues

Other:
These are just a few recent example. Paulatpeace is requiring an insane amount of time and energy from the mods, while also create a negative experience for everyone who has to read his long-winded, nonsensical posts.

There is precedent to remove users for repeated infractions of these guidelines, GLG and Ahava are two instances that come to mind.

Respectfully Submitted,

BGtheBrain

rockfist wrote:Paula is a pain in the ass lately IMO. He/she (is it Paula or Paul I can't tell from the signon - I'll go with "he") also was warned for violating the rules and if he is guilty of more rule violations deserves some sort of a break/ban.

Either he is the king of self righteousness or he actually believes he is correct in some of his actions. I'd prefer he be given the benefit of the doubt on the argumentativeness (not rule violations though).

This site does not need more people leaving.

If he's banned for being a pain, who's to say I won't be next (I've asked a lot of questions about CR@W - trust me).

PaulatPeace wrote:

rockfist wrote:Paula is a pain in the ass lately IMO. He/she (is it Paula or Paul I can't tell from the signon - I'll go with "he") also was warned for violating the rules and if he is guilty of more rule violations deserves some sort of a break/ban.

Either he is the king of self righteousness or he actually believes he is correct in some of his actions. I'd prefer he be given the benefit of the doubt on the argumentativeness (not rule violations though).

This site does not need more people leaving.

If he's banned for being a pain, who's to say I won't be next (I've asked a lot of questions about CR@W - trust me).

The name is Paul rockfist....(but you know this from having read the many posts where I signed my name as Paul).

You are one of the players I have not foed yet, so I can actually read your post.

I absolutely agree with you...If I am guilty of more rule violations after I was warned...I deserve additional punishment. I will not however dignify this frivolous accusation by BG with a response.

The more important thing to me is the question of whether I am being self righteous and a religious fanatic as some have claimed, or whether or not I actually believe what I have said. I can assure you I believe wholeheartedly everything I have said! I have never said I am incapable of being wrong....but I passionately detest abusive authority!!! You may have noticed that although people will often disagree with me in these forums, they turn around afterwards and implement changes which address the very issues I have brought to light. Had these changes been implemented in the first place, there would have been no issues! The discussions I initiate and the comments I make are out of a sincere concern for justice and fair & equitable treatment. It is not difficult to identify those players who make comments indicative of an agenda designed to only cause disruption and chaos. Then there are those like you, who may not agree with me, but find a way to express themselves respectfully. Even xroads had the integrity to say I was not guilty of any cheating or gross abuse in the recent allegations. He does not care for me, but he is respectful.

I respect those who disagree with me and offer intelligent discussion in an effort to arrive at the truth. I am a Christian, but not one who condemns anyone. I believe strongly in the equal rights of all men and women, all faiths, races, colors, sexual orientations.... and yes, all opinions. This online game we play here must have a level playing field. The people who are in positions of authority and administration must wield this authority with fairness and equal administration to all.

So yes...I appreciate you giving me the benefit of the doubt...because I do believe earnestly is all I say and all I do!

Be Well,

Paul