Conquer Club

PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Accused:

P3K
bluesblazzer

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 17103803

Comments: In the above game, still active, it appears these 2 accounts may be controlled by the same person. The in-game deal making seemed sketchy, and then it seemed like there was a clear deal made shown by actions taken, with an in-game truce officialized after the actions. Then P3K made this comment:

2017-02-05 06:49:44 - P3K: I have no idea how my chat ended up showing that red said it but I assure you it was I who wrote. It has been reported and is being investigated

I highly doubt this was "reported and is being investigated" and this statement appears to me to be clear evidence this this person is controlling both accounts. This is given further weight by the fact that, although red (bluesblazzer) was the vocal one in the game, P3K (Green) somewhat suddenly eliminated red, with no word from red, etc, and then green became vocal, in quite the same style of voicing. As a matter of fact, the above clip was the first comment by P3K all game.

The game has since then become very tainted I would say, as Green has gone on to do great favors for one of the other teams, to the detriment of himself. For instance, Green does a large Trebuchet attack, which then cleared the way for silver to come in and absorb neutral territories. That is really not a part of competitive game play, truce or no truce.

Let me know what you guys think.

There has been a case about this before, I'm not gonna search it for you, please find it yourself

viewtopic.php?f=239&t=221712

- Here it is Seamus, this case has been cleared and closed bro. GL2U.

Yep, I just found it, and they were cleared. I gave you new evidence, which is now actual proof, that these 2 people have access to each other's accounts, and are at the very least breaking CC rules by being on each other's accounts in game with no coverage protocol being followed. Please read the log, which I gave a direct cut and paste of in my complaint. You appear to have dismissed this complaint without reading it.

Seamus Corrigan wrote:although red (bluesblazzer) was the vocal one in the game, P3K (Green) somewhat suddenly eliminated red, with no word from red, etc, and then green became vocal, in quite the same style of voicing.

lol. 2 posts in the whole game = 'being vocal'?

Well they certainly are not multi's.
As I am not an expert regarding the sitting rules I won't give my opinion on that and rather let someone who knows what he's talking about.

and if Seamus Corrigan had bothered to read the other report he must not understand (English not native?) or is just lazy

I have a truce and to me that means that you do what you can to eliminate the oppostition. This seems like sore loser to me. The guy won't take no for an answer when others don't see things his way. I won't bother to look but I wonder how often this guy complains when he loses. I'm just here to have fun and have a little diversion from life's pressures. This crap could ruin it. Still, I appreciate the time and effort the fraud and abuse to looking into these things.

Are you aware you linked a team game?

There's team games?

Cleared