Conquer Club

Accused:


ceasarpat




The accused are suspected of:


Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 17212699


Comments: ceasarpat posted on Ander023 wall as posted below. This should be done in game chat and not outside. This was before the argument that broke out in chat so it was not reactive to the environment that became the chat log of the game. The time stamp shows that. I dont necessarily think that Ander023 was part of it but I do find it out after ceaserpat suicided into me he db and was kicked on the last turn giving the game to ceaserpat when he would have won.

when you are ready to go through gotland let me know and i ll break truce with blue
User avatar
by ceasarpat
on Fri Feb 10, 2017 3:32 pm

open... meet shut... good find... next time take a snap, people delete posts when they get caught... i got a snap if the mods want it...
the black jesus has provided helpfulness, as always...-Jésus noir

owenshooter wrote:open... meet shut... good find... next time take a snap, people delete posts when they get caught... i got a snap if the mods want it...
the black jesus has provided helpfulness, as always...-Jésus noir

Thanks i didnt think about getting a snap. If you got it then I will default to you if they need it.

Gurgatron is just pissed off that he broke a truce and ended up losing.
I was only trying to offset his poor sporstmanship and backstabbing.

He is incorrect on the timing of the argument and the posting on the wall mid game.

The outcome of the game did not matter based on the comment.
Once he attacked me breaking the truce, my only goal was to take him out and let the other remaining player win.
If you look at the game long you will see i ran through his armies and took all but 3 or 4 before the turns ran out.
I won based on the circumstances of the game, not a comment on a players wall....

My apologies for not doing it in game forum and doing it on the wall.

It was a reaction to his poor play and crappy attitude.
It will not happen again.

thanks

ceasarpat wrote:Gurgatron is just pissed off that he broke a truce and ended up losing.
I was only trying to offset his poor sporstmanship and backstabbing.

He is incorrect on the timing of the argument and the posting on the wall mid game.

The outcome of the game did not matter based on the comment.
Once he attacked me breaking the truce, my only goal was to take him out and let the other remaining player win.
If you look at the game long you will see i ran through his armies and took all but 3 or 4 before the turns ran out.
I won based on the circumstances of the game, not a comment on a players wall....

My apologies for not doing it in game forum and doing it on the wall.

It was a reaction to his poor play and crappy attitude.
It will not happen again.

thanks

Lol you defended yourself with "the outcome of the game did not matter based on the comment"..thats like thing #1 not to do while trying to defend yourself XD

Anyways you'll get a warning and move on with life, don't do it again.

All you have to do isn't read the chat, the logs, and then re when I was posted. He was made because I offered an agreement on a boarder not to attack. He misinterpreted as a truce. I hit a territory of his far away from agreed area and he the attacked on the boarder we agreed not to breaking the agreement. So tell me why he would post about breaking a truce after he already had. His reasoning is because of my play. He never said anything until after he already broke the truce on chat and the time stamp shows it was before I attacked him. Way to straight up lie about what you were trying to do. I did nothing wrong. You were the one that broke our agreement and worse you were the one going to someone else's wall and trying to talk game tactics and then lied about what you did.

dude drop it, you lost because you broke a truce and i ran through your army and lands.
I took any chance of you winning the game, the comment on his wall (though poor sportsmanship) had nothing to do with the outcome.
I outplayed you in the end after you broke the truce.

its not my fault said player had to deadbeat, i was content just keeping you from winning.

regardless of my poor judgement to speak with him after you broke the truce, you still lost.
running to mommy to complain is immature.

None of this would have occurred had you honored the truce. Plain and simple.

Lol you defended yourself with "the outcome of the game did not matter based on the comment"..thats like thing #1 not to do while trying to defend yourself XD

Anyways you'll get a warning and move on with life, don't do it again.

I wasnt defending myself with that sentence. Just stating a fact that he is a sore loser, that an asinine comment made in error has no impact on the game.
My defense was that i was wrong to post on the wall vs the game forum.
My defense was that he broke the truce, so i attacked, and then he is trying to pass the blame on to me.
I had a second truce with the third player, whom we adhered to it....

Just tired of kids pretending to be fair then complaining when they lose because they made a fatal error.

Mate you just can't post things about the game outside game chat.
Doesn't matter if it changes the outcome of the game, it is just prohibited and labelled as 'secret diplomacy'.

This apart from the fact that you were extremely lucky Ander went away out of nowhere and had to db last round.

PurpleViper wrote:Mate you just can't post things about the game outside game chat.
Doesn't matter if it changes the outcome of the game, it is just prohibited and labelled as 'secret diplomacy.

anything outside of the game is cheating or secret diplomacy. had you posted, "hey, left you some chat in our game, check it
before your next turn," that would be ok. posting game specific stuff, regardless of the outcome, is a violation of CC rules.
good luck in the future. the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

About the game I said. Specifics I meant with that.

Indeed if I wall you 'hey bj check game chat gr me'
That's no problem

ceaserpat has been WARNED

TeeGee wrote:ceaserpat has been WARNED

AHEM Called it

Frox333 wrote:

TeeGee wrote:ceaserpat has been WARNED

AHEM Called it

um, what was there to "CALL"? it was an open and shut case. he posted info on another players wall. please explain in great detail how your "calling" of "it", was so against the general consensus in the thread? even the Warned member stated he had done it and was not aware of the rule. so glad you were able to "AHEM", "Call it"... *eyes rolling out of my black jesus skull*... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir