Conquer Club

PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!
Accused:

CommKnight

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis


Game number(s):

Game 17125475
Game 17125476
Game 17051791

Comments: Played absolutely flawless in hive, feudal and beta maps including trench and fog for never ever playing on them ever before and only been a member for a month Sorry, not buying it.

Pending

I was already checked.

Also next time you fill a report about me, how about actually inboxing me about it eh? I even linked you to my clear when you accused me in game.

I'm super competitive in this game in real life, I analyze everything before I make a move. I read the maps, I've read THIS entire section. I've done my research and have lost games before I've won them on certain maps.

But go ahead and check me again, there should be something about filling in multiple reports when he has already been linked to the thread I've linked above of myself being cleared.

Also, I'm going to win the tournament I'm in that I eliminated you from. Just so I can shove it in your face for being an ass to me both in game and in private messages.

Why would a true newbie even think to look at this page?

Also, you were accused already????? Sounds like you simply moved and got a new ip address, because you are definitely not new to CC. Same old BS excuse I study the site and maps.......total crap used by every multi ever caught. Only experience will help you understand when to load and how and where to strike on some of the maps you won on against not just experienced players like brigadiers and colonels, but the freaking Concquerer in just your first turn on each map. Sorry, but you are not someone who read a one page link on what Fog and trench mean, you are someone who has played on this site under a different name and gained experience and now came on and are stealing points from players who earned them fair and square.

b00060 wrote:Why would a true newbie even think to look at this page?

Also, you were accused already????? Sounds like you simply moved and got a new ip address, because you are definitely not new to CC. Same old BS excuse I study the site and maps.......total crap used by every multi ever caught. Only experience will help you understand when to load and how and where to strike on some of the maps you won on against not just experienced players like brigadiers and colonels, but the freaking Concquerer in just your first turn on each map. Sorry, but you are not someone who read a one page link on what Fog and trench mean, you are someone who has played on this site under a different name and gained experience and now came on and are stealing points from players who earned them fair and square.

If an IP address was all i had to use to make a decision, this would have been cleared within seconds of the accusation. In fact an IP match makes up a very small portion of the tools available in a multi search. Many players come here with advanced intelligence and logic will in many cases trump experience.
As for why would a newb look at C&A, if that is the case then I am guilty as it was one of the first pages I ever looked at.

CommKnight is still CLEARED

b00060 wrote:Why would a true newbie even think to look at this page?

Also, you were accused already????? Sounds like you simply moved and got a new ip address, because you are definitely not new to CC. Same old BS excuse I study the site and maps.......total crap used by every multi ever caught. Only experience will help you understand when to load and how and where to strike on some of the maps you won on against not just experienced players like brigadiers and colonels, but the freaking Concquerer in just your first turn on each map. Sorry, but you are not someone who read a one page link on what Fog and trench mean, you are someone who has played on this site under a different name and gained experience and now came on and are stealing points from players who earned them fair and square.

Okay, thread is not locked, so let me explain.

1.) I've been linked to this thread. Which if you're going to accuse me, have the guts to link me to the thread so I can pitch in. Don't be a coward.
2.) I use forums and in fact have moderated and admin a few. I'm actually working on creating a forum for my organization currently.
3.) Due to 2, I usually check everything and this section just stands out and I was reading through some of them to see how it worked and seen the first one.

Yes I was accused by the current Conqueror (As I understand it, only 1 is present on this game at a time) for the Hive game and having a good first turn. Which to me was the common sense thing to do, go after easy bonuses and use as many 3 dice as possible by loading up territs with 1 troop. I do this in real life as well, which I just thought was common knowledge, but I guess not to you guys.

As for Fog, have you never played Age of Empires/Mythology or any other RTS game with Fog of War as an option? I play those games on expert level difficulty because I find the AI is too slow for me when it comes to figuring out randomly generated maps.

Trench says it clear enough for me, I use this option in real life as well because I don't like letting players continuously assault. Sometimes I limit attacks even more by not allowing a region to be attacked by more than one region that turn. Meaning, if you attack me in say Eastern Canada from wherever, once you stop attacking me there from your offensive base, you can no longer attack there until your next turn.

b00060 wrote:Too bad you lost both dumbshit! Enjoy CC under your new name, and taking peoples points by cheating. You are pathetic!

This is the kind of person you are. If you can't handle a new player beating you, then you should either quit all together or stop playing with new players.

So you're not Woodruff? I had some pretty interesting circumstanial evidence.

Symmetry wrote:So you're not Woodruff? I had some pretty interesting circumstanial evidence.

Well I've been cleared and I don't even know who Woodruff is.

CommKnight wrote:

Symmetry wrote:So you're not Woodruff? I had some pretty interesting circumstanial evidence.

Well I've been cleared and I don't even know who Woodruff is.

Indeed you have. Woodruff was a player who wrote like you, quit just before you joined, and shared your interests. All fun circumstantial stuff.

Why didn't you post your original unsolicited mail to me stating that:

" you are going to enjoy taking my points in the promontory summit games"

??????????? That is why I responded with the quote below.

b00060 wrote:Too bad you lost both dumbshit! Enjoy CC under your new name, and taking peoples points by cheating. You are pathetic!

Like I said, I have been on this site for almost a decade and played literally thousands of players and yes, caught SEVERAL multis, because like you, they make it blatantly obvious they have played here before and exceed on extremely specialized maps and settings right out of the gate. I lose everyday and have lost over 20 thousands games, so losing doesn't mean crap to me. Losing to cheaters that are obvious and then talk shit about it, pisses me off. I have not posted in this forum in years, yet your arrogance and obvious knowledge about CC as a "noob" in particular define just what a coward is. Either way you are foed and I will move on. Enjoy CC as I am sure you have been for years.

TeeGee wrote:

b00060 wrote:Why would a true newbie even think to look at this page?

Also, you were accused already????? Sounds like you simply moved and got a new ip address, because you are definitely not new to CC. Same old BS excuse I study the site and maps.......total crap used by every multi ever caught. Only experience will help you understand when to load and how and where to strike on some of the maps you won on against not just experienced players like brigadiers and colonels, but the freaking Concquerer in just your first turn on each map. Sorry, but you are not someone who read a one page link on what Fog and trench mean, you are someone who has played on this site under a different name and gained experience and now came on and are stealing points from players who earned them fair and square.

If an IP address was all i had to use to make a decision, this would have been cleared within seconds of the accusation. In fact an IP match makes up a very small portion of the tools available in a multi search. Many players come here with advanced intelligence and logic will in many cases trump experience.
As for why would a newb look at C&A, if that is the case then I am guilty as it was one of the first pages I ever looked at.

CommKnight is still CLEARED

And TeeGee, did you continue to look at this link hourly??? After all, he commented on my post within 5 hours and as he stated above, I didn't tell him I was posting here. He knows he is a cheater. And no, his "advanced intelligence" is not the reason he won on maps, settings and players he has played on his first time on the map. You can read all the strategies in the world and you still need experience to know when to do what. There is a reason that even the best of the best on this site have to have their hand held on the nuances on maps they are not familiar with on in team games.

Also very curious as to why this guy "Extreme Ways" has any reason to chat about other players on Commknights wall. He tried to tip him off about the post, but Commknight already posted in it according to the time stamp. They are not from the same country so I doubt they know each other that way and have never played a game together. Very peculiar?????

b00060 wrote:Also very curious as to why this guy "Extreme Ways" has any reason to chat about other players on Commknights wall. He tried to tip him off about the post, but Commknight already posted in it according to the time stamp. They are not from the same country so I doubt they know each other that way and have never played a game together. Very peculiar?????

There's a topic in GD where the guy you accused was asking if it was normal behaviour to accuse someone for being good. Don't worry it's not about your report, it's about Kaskavel's report. So yes, I briefly spoke with him since I want new players 'to stick around. If he is indeed a multi with new data, then I have wasted some 20 minutes of my time. Worth it.

God damn you responded fast. I guess lock it, people have been foed and I will move on. Let them ruin CC for someone else.

b00060 wrote:God damn you responded fast. I guess lock it, people have been foed and I will move on. Let them ruin CC for someone else.

Because you walled me and I wondered what it was about... I was online.

Extreme Ways wrote:

b00060 wrote:God damn you responded fast. I guess lock it, people have been foed and I will move on. Let them ruin CC for someone else.

Because you walled me and I wondered what it was about... I was online.

Lol, this b000 guy is just so sour. I'm glad people like EW are on here otherwise I would've cancelled my membership and demanded a refund. I'm competitive in this game, but I don't like people being asses.

Also sure, I'll post the entire messages.

CommKnight wrote:Just thought you'd like to see this since the fellas said I should send this to you.

Cleared Thread

By the way, you've been a bit of an asshat. I'm going to enjoy beating you in both Summit maps and taking your points now because of how you've treated me.

- CK

b00060 wrote:Too bad you lost both dumbshit! Enjoy CC under your new name, and taking peoples points by cheating. You are pathetic!

CommKnight wrote:You one by one troop in one of them. So just barely.

Honestly, I don't know why you think I'm a multi, but you're just sour for losing a few games against me. Sorry, but you aren't perfect. Just because you're beat by a new player. Then you result to name calling. What is this? Junior High?

All three messages now for even the Abuse team to see.

Post Edit*: Thought there were 4 messages but there were 3 in private message. Accidentally quoted what he said twice.

a month and a half here, and his rating is a 3.8?

Beast Of Burson wrote:a month and a half here, and his rating is a 3.8?

He's only been rated by four people. Very small sample size.

new recruits shouldn't be rated/be allowed to rate.

Dukasaur wrote:

Beast Of Burson wrote:a month and a half here, and his rating is a 3.8?

He's only been rated by four people. Very small sample size.

Indeed, I think he had 4 ratings when I looked into him- 3 entirely positive, 1 entirely negative. Hence the low average.

you two need to face the facts about your feelings for each other...




that is a good start... be sure to link me to the wedding registry!!!
the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

b00 is right lol.

Well, I missed this one on time, but it does not matter. I have filled some reports through the years, based solely on opponent's inconstinency between experience and playing accuracy. My results had been devastating, it may as well be the first time a report of mine was cleared. It is not difficut for me to understand when something is fishy in my opponent's play in hive and comm was fishy. Still, if no evidence is found (as in this case), I am more than willing to accept he is just a talented player, after all, I can never be certain, eventualy a good player will trick me into thinking he is a multi. And his play slightly got worst next rounds (still extremely good, but not perfect as first round)
B00060, I understand the way you feel, but there is a possibility the guy is clear.
Commknight, I missed your other topic in GD, so a few words.
1. I do such reports occasionaly, with succesful results, but I am aware that eventualy I will be wrong. So, I am always very careful in my "accusations". In fact they are not even accusations, they are suspicions, based on my experience and nothing more. I always make that clear in the report with something like what I wrote in yours ("as usual I may be wrong and the guy is just very talented, but a multi check wouldn't hurt etc")
2. While I am clearly in favour of the opinion that an accused player should be automatically informed about most accusations, I intentionally do not inform them in these cases. My logic is simple. If he is a multi, then it does not matter. If he is innocent, that means he is a very talented player, whom I just wrongly reported and who does not need to do anything to clear himself-the IP checks etc are going to clear him. Being new to the site, he may not like what happened and the last thing I want is to make the site an unpleasant place for a new talented player.
3. Those reprots of mine are irrelevant to the game status. You had terrible dice in first round and you could hardly recover, but my report was a matter of principle.
4. If you are innocent, then I hope you understand my points and do not view my report or the fact I did not inform you aggressively, both were not random, childish or rude actions, I have a very specific reason of acting this way as explained above, regardless of whether you agree or not. Also, if you are innocent, I wish you a fast and succesful advancement
5. Well...if you are guilty, well done. For the record, I still give you less than 50% to really be a new player, but that is just a feeling-nothing more-and it does not mean much.

It's fine Kaskavel. I don't have a problem with your report. You haven't approached me negatively about my style nor attacked my character directly.

RISK is my preferred board-game in real life. I have developed my own strategy over the years and it seemed to work for the first couple of games (even as far as for you and b0000 to make these threads). But the luck of the dice is another one in its' own. I lost 16 to 7, not even killing a single unit of the 7 in a currently ongoing game. That is truly demoralizing when dice run dry on ya like that. (Wish it'd happen to my opponents as often as it seems to be happening to me lately).

So I get it, it's precaution. However, b0000's actions have gone past precaution and has stepped into bullying. I'm not a soft skin and can't be scared off as easily as you might think, in fact his negativity has been bringing me quite the attention from some higher ranks. So in that, I thank him, but for the language he's used is what I'm finding particularly distasteful.

I play Mafia games on various sites + Town of Salem and it can get heated when accusing people of being mafia, but even they draw the line at someone resulting to personal attacks.

TL;DR: You're okay Kaskavel, it's b0000 that I have a problem with.

Symmetry wrote:So you're not Woodruff? I had some pretty interesting circumstanial evidence.

Oooh...interesting! Who'se my doppelganger?

Also, I pretty much sucked at this game, so if CommKnight is actually skilled at it, that should pretty much prove he's not me. <grin>