KraphtOne - Point dumping [ka]
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 6:23 pm
Accused:
KraphtOne
The accused are suspected of:
Intentionally losing/point dumping.
Krapth's skill had dropped immensely. It's a very tough game for him currently. I think he likes to win monthly scoreboard or just get the most number of points won in a single game award or something with CC11.
Game 17083591 - Joined as second player, left the game not even a minute later.
Game 17079863 - Is ahead, deadbeats.
Game 17079849 - Deadbeats. Note that the game above was played during deadbeating this.
Game 17080323 - Decides he suddenly has no skill anymore and takes 2 neutral to take a bonus easily broken. Note that this is just extremely poor play in comparison to how Krapht used to play.
Game 17079664 - Opponent takes a bonus turn 1, Krapht owns both neigbouring territories yet drops entirely elsewhere to take a neutral. Does it again the turn after, to take a bonus once again broken easily.
Game 17079600 - Didn't even try to attack for the most part of the game.
Game 17079519 - Took a neutral, unnecessary and more poor play by a non-poor player. I'd also like to know if he was sitting on a set T5.
Game 17075277 - Krapht takes 5 neutrals in a map with 18 regions, of which 3/5 are on the same continent so this is once again very obvious not trying to win.
Game 17075274 - OK this game was lost from the get-go since opponent dropped a bonus and started, but he literally drops on a territory surrounded by neutrals the whole game. I do understand Krapht not wanting to play since he had no chance to break the bonus.
Game 17062114 - Once again poor play. Krapth drops Iceland for no reason while Africa is almost in full control of opponent.
Game 17053688 - Taking China T1 is not just a mistake, it's trying to lose.
I found these games by just checking some speeders and reading logs in games where it's easy to say whether someone tried or not. Krapth isn't a bad player at all and never played this poor. If he denies it's not trying to win I'd argue he's account sharing instead. There's plenty more if you really dedicate some time to it.
KraphtOne
The accused are suspected of:
Intentionally losing/point dumping.
Krapth's skill had dropped immensely. It's a very tough game for him currently. I think he likes to win monthly scoreboard or just get the most number of points won in a single game award or something with CC11.
Game 17083591 - Joined as second player, left the game not even a minute later.
Game 17079863 - Is ahead, deadbeats.
Game 17079849 - Deadbeats. Note that the game above was played during deadbeating this.
Game 17080323 - Decides he suddenly has no skill anymore and takes 2 neutral to take a bonus easily broken. Note that this is just extremely poor play in comparison to how Krapht used to play.
Game 17079664 - Opponent takes a bonus turn 1, Krapht owns both neigbouring territories yet drops entirely elsewhere to take a neutral. Does it again the turn after, to take a bonus once again broken easily.
Game 17079600 - Didn't even try to attack for the most part of the game.
Game 17079519 - Took a neutral, unnecessary and more poor play by a non-poor player. I'd also like to know if he was sitting on a set T5.
Game 17075277 - Krapht takes 5 neutrals in a map with 18 regions, of which 3/5 are on the same continent so this is once again very obvious not trying to win.
Game 17075274 - OK this game was lost from the get-go since opponent dropped a bonus and started, but he literally drops on a territory surrounded by neutrals the whole game. I do understand Krapht not wanting to play since he had no chance to break the bonus.
Game 17062114 - Once again poor play. Krapth drops Iceland for no reason while Africa is almost in full control of opponent.
Game 17053688 - Taking China T1 is not just a mistake, it's trying to lose.
I found these games by just checking some speeders and reading logs in games where it's easy to say whether someone tried or not. Krapth isn't a bad player at all and never played this poor. If he denies it's not trying to win I'd argue he's account sharing instead. There's plenty more if you really dedicate some time to it.