Page 1 of 1

Mbc83 sethaf330 [ka]

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:40 pm
by BartolosBakery
Accused:

Mbc83
Sethaf330

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy



Game number(s):

17032369


Comments:
Every game that is open by mbc83 has sethaf330 in it. I called them out for having a secret diplomacy. Both denied the truce. The next turn mbc83 attacked sethaf330. Sethaf330 responds by suiciding into the largest player that wasn't mbc83. They played the game without having a defended border through Africa.

Re: Mbc83 sethaf330

PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:59 pm
by MagnusGreeol
BartolosBakery wrote:Accused:

Mbc83
Sethaf330

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy





Game number(s):

Game 17032369


Comments:
Every game that is open by mbc83 has sethaf330 in it. I called them out for having a secret diplomacy. Both denied the truce. The next turn mbc83 attacked sethaf330. Sethaf330 responds by suiciding into the largest player that wasn't mbc83. They played the game without having a defended border through Africa.


- Fixed - MG♎

Re: Mbc83 sethaf330

PostPosted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 8:42 pm
by king achilles
Blue seems to be assaulting any regions regardless of who owns it. If green isn't a threat to him and he is not attacking or can barely attack him, wouldn't it also be logical to leave an opponent like that alone? At this time, I don't think we have enough to confirm they have a secret alliance in their games, especially if we only have one game as evidence that we can be suspicious about.

Re: Mbc83 sethaf330

PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:22 pm
by eddie2
king achilles wrote:Blue seems to be assaulting any regions regardless of who owns it. If green isn't a threat to him and he is not attacking or can barely attack him, wouldn't it also be logical to leave an opponent like that alone? At this time, I don't think we have enough to confirm they have a secret alliance in their games, especially if we only have one game as evidence that we can be suspicious about.


i think you can add asindoni and hamtech recon to the list could be multis or a close group of friends.

the games where these 4 just play together there is no game chat either so obviously if they are friends they are chatting outside of the games. meaning s/d maybe a warning that they should create there games private so others cannot accidently join them would be enough.