Conquer Club

Accused:

Sir KillALot
SkyMonkey6

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis or
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
16871669

Comments:
Both players haven't assault eachother for almost 50 rounds! Without offering a truce in the game chat.
Not even when it was strategic the best option for one of them.

Arnoud1969 wrote:Accused:

Sir KillALot
SkyMonkey6

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis or
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
Game 16871669

Comments:
Both players haven't assault eachother for more than 30 rounds! Without offering a truce in the game chat.
Not even when it was strategic the best option for one of them.

Fixed links.

....and no secret diplomacy??

Arnoud1969 wrote:....and no secret diplomacy??

ummmm... he is not a moderator... he is a member that was nice enough to post your complaint properly, because you were too lazy to do so. stay patient, the moderators will look into your complaint. in the meantime, just a quick look at all three of your walls, shows instances of secret diplomacy... the irony... SCREEN SHOTS OF YOUR WALLS:


SKYMONKEY6


Arnoud1969



Sir KillALot


the black jesus is amused...-Jésus noir

p.s.-so funny... the guy can't take the time to post his complain right and wants some sort of instant street justice, while being guilty of what he accuses others of...
p.p.s.-i bet RAGNAR WOLVES, DEUS DAMORTA and DAVID 63 get a warning for the diplomacy they posted on those walls!!! this is just golden on so many levels...

ouch!

Nicely turned, Black Jesus.

Yup, that pretty much defines irony....

I might be wrong but I seem to remember a couple of skymonkeys who were busted for being multis last year

Ragnar Wolved pm'd me to tell me what he did on the wall was not secret diplomacy. Going to a wall and saying, "hey, i posted some chat in the game for you, please look", is ok. going to the wall and saying, "yo, i am going to give you X, so Y, etc, etc, etc", is secret diplomacy. Why? the wall recipient does not have to accept it in the game, etc... i read chat all the time in my team games, but honestly, if it isn't my team, i skim right over it... anyway, this is going to be good.-Bj

I am sure we have had a case where they were not warned because the person posted in game chat and because no response in game chat the player then posted same thing on the wall. This I think is ok as long as if a response is made it is posted in chat

Liam Connor wrote:I might be wrong but I seem to remember a couple of skymonkeys who were busted for being multis last year

those were Supermokey6 and 7 that got busted for being multi

eddie2 wrote:I am sure we have had a case where they were not warned because the person posted in game chat and because no response in game chat the player then posted same thing on the wall. This I think is ok as long as if a response is made it is posted in chat

100% incorrect.-Bj

The wall comment is about another game... Looking deeper

The comment used as evidence is made by another player as the accused. Can we rewind and make sure who is accused of what here?

Sniffie

sniffie wrote:The wall comment is about another game... Looking deeper

The comment used as evidence is made by another player as the accused. Can we rewind and make sure who is accused of what here?

Sniffie

sorry, Sniff!!! i just started poking around and bumped into secret diplomacy on all three walls (the accuser and the accused).. it was just ironic... then Ragnar Wolves was mentioned, because of the obvious secret diplomacy found on one of the walls... it just kind of keeps unfolding.. especially if you scan down the walls... sorry!!! the black jesus just stepped into a pile of secret diplomacy poop!!! the black jesus has spoken..-Jésus noir

sniffie wrote:The wall comment is about another game... Looking deeper

The comment used as evidence is made by another player as the accused. Can we rewind and make sure who is accused of what here?

Sniffie

To rewind, as you asked for.

Sir KillALot and SkyMonkey6(SN)
Postby Arnoud1969 on Sat Nov 05, 2016 3:52 pm

Accused:

Sir KillALot
SkyMonkey6

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis or
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
16871669

Comments:
Both players haven't assault eachother for almost 50 rounds! Without offering a truce in the game chat.
Not even when it was strategic the best option for one of them.
It also looks like they coordinate the assaults together.

Arnoud1969 wrote:

sniffie wrote:The wall comment is about another game... Looking deeper

The comment used as evidence is made by another player as the accused. Can we rewind and make sure who is accused of what here?

Sniffie

To rewind, as you asked for.

Sir KillALot and SkyMonkey6(SN)
Postby Arnoud1969 on Sat Nov 05, 2016 3:52 pm

Accused:

Sir KillALot
SkyMonkey6

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis or
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
16871669

Comments:
Both players haven't assault eachother for almost 50 rounds! Without offering a truce in the game chat.
Not even when it was strategic the best option for one of them.
It also looks like they coordinate the assaults together.

your links are, yet again, wrong, come on... do it right or don't do it at all... furthermore, you left out the part where you are guilty of what you are accusing others of... *snicker*... sorry, you lost any cred in here when that was seen by all... good luck!!!-Bj

Dear "Owenshooter",

FIRST: There is no secret diplomacy on my wall. You can not accuse me about something what others write down on my wall.
SECOND: If I have posted/reported something wrong or not in a right way, don't call me names (like "Snicker" or "Lazy"). Just explain me in simple English (I am Dutch) what I did wrong. I am not doing this on purpose. This is is my first time, that I report something. We are here to help eachother out. Not for calling eachother names ( "Snicker" or "Lazy")

Thank you.....
Arnoud1969

"Snicker" is an action, not a name. It's a type of laugh, like a derisive chuckle.

Both players are cleared. It is not uo to me to judge their strategy. I can't find no evidence that they are multi's or have dicussed game chat outside the game.

DeusDamorta and Ragnar Wolves have been warned.

Sniff

Cleared

sniffie wrote:DeusDamorta and Ragnar Wolves have been warned.

kind of cool that this ended this way... good job, sniff...-Bj