saxitoxin wrote:BoganGod wrote:please understand this will be a fruitless crusade
the correct term is LGBTQless, jackass
No, you sir are incorrect. The lazy habit of referring to homosexuals as fruits is an ad hominen attack on fruits. Also trivialises the specialness and like total wow+++++ uniqueness of the gay experience. I clearly meant fruitless, as in resultless, lacking resolution. When I tease my gay lawyer younger brother(I have some truly special family members, don't know whether the gayness cancels out the evil from choosing to be a lawyer), I make sure to include a lot of references to vagina, and what he is missing out on. Have no interest in un "gaying" him, reckon I've made him vomit in his mouth at least twice.