I just comment that was clearly a honest mistake, as he put he was sitting me in chat. If he didn't, no one was able to realize this situation. So it's OK to groal on chat, but if this case is about to put a warning to fairman, it's quite unfair. If I had less than 20 games, it would be easier to check every game and organize with another sitter.
As you say dakky, we're playing CC for more than 7 years and we know rules, but we also know how it can be difficult to control everything, as you must also know dude, as a ex mod !
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
And when you're sitting, you must be fair when sitter and sitted are both in same game.
As clanmates, a lot of people can check my games, and in games we share, I think everyone is fair enough ( and fairman especially) not to abuse of this position.
It's also my fault, I had to say who couldn't sit me in such and such game.
owenshooter wrote:fairman wrote:He's away for the week end and has 70 active games, no I haven't checked if I was in ...
Ok my fault. But I don't see any advantage in a no spoil game but well ... up to you.
that has to be one of the most daft statements given in one's own self defense, in the history of daft comments given by one in their own self defense. you see no advantage in a terminator fog game, in which you are playing two of the accounts in the game?! seriously? OPEN, meet SHUT... the black jesus is amused...-Bj
In case of intentionnal action, you're right, but this is irrelevant here. an advantage exists when you take it, if not it doesn't matter.
![Smile :-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)