Conquer Club

Rad Roofer has a winning percentage of 38%, which seems extraordinary.
prime minister1 is 28%, which is pretty darn good.

Accused:

Rad Roofer
prime minister1

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis OR Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 16801083



Comments: A snip of the board in round 13 is attached. Rad Roofer (green) is strongest player at this point with 21 territories and getting 20 troops last turn. Rad Roofer moves before prime minister1 (blue) - Prime minister1 should have taken Coris from Rad Roofer because it is adjacent to objective Antioch and complete bonus group. Only one territory was lost to the other so far in the game. Prime minister1 has spent nearly the whole game parked and gone nowhere, not like a player with a 28% winning average.

SteveHereNow wrote:Rad Roofer has a winning percentage of 38%, which seems extraordinary.
prime minister1 is 28%, which is pretty darn good.

Accused:

Rad Roofer
prime minister1

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis OR Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 16801083



Comments: A snip of the board in round 13 is attached. Rad Roofer (green) is strongest player at this point with 21 territories and getting 20 troops last turn. Rad Roofer moves before prime minister1 (blue) - Prime minister1 should have taken Coris from Rad Roofer because it is adjacent to objective Antioch and complete bonus group. Only one territory was lost to the other so far in the game. Prime minister1 has spent nearly the whole game parked and gone nowhere, not like a player with a 28% winning average.

Other way round - Prime minister1 is 38%. It's not that extraordinary, I have 40% - but I play mostly 3-player games, with the occasional 2 and 4 player, so it's only just over expectation. He seems to play a fair few doubles games.
This is only their second game together.

On the other hand, roofing and politics are both professions that are filled with scam artists, so caveat emptor!

Win percentages rely solely on the type of games you play. If you play 4 player games and you're an average player, you'll be on 25%; 5 player games 20% etc. It's not a reliable statistic to judge a player by.

Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.

I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.

Thanks.

-WDK

Bollocks.

mrswdk wrote:Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.

I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.

Thanks.

-WDK

Bollocks.

I really think it would help if you didn't keep derailing these threads.
If I were a mod, I'd warn you about it and a possible forum holiday/ban. Is it worth risking that?

Pending

clangfield wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.

I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.

Thanks.

-WDK

Bollocks.

I really think it would help if you didn't keep derailing these threads.
If I were a mod, I'd warn you about it and a possible forum holiday/ban. Is it worth risking that?

Is it worth risking clangfield saying he doesn't like my input?

mrswdk wrote:

clangfield wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.

I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.

Thanks.

-WDK

Bollocks.

I really think it would help if you didn't keep derailing these threads.
If I were a mod, I'd warn you about it and a possible forum holiday/ban. Is it worth risking that?

Is it worth risking clangfield saying he doesn't like my input?

not sure anyone here does, mrs - maybe stick to trolling OT...

no evidence found, lack of games between the pair

Nothing to see

CLEARED