Conquer Club

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 12:51 am**

Accused:

supermokey7
supermokey6

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 16128857
Game 16128874
Game 16128886
Game 14884971
Game 14884947

I joined a game with supermokey7 and was looking at his other games and noticed he was in a game with supermokey6 and was watching it and supermokey7 was just deploying in one spot and not attacking and letting supermokey6 win the game Game 16128857. and they have set up more games after this one and I am sure the game I joined threw that off on this game. If you could take a look at this that would be great.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 5:37 am**

This seems an obvious multi, I had a look and only one of them fights

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 7:54 am**

BIG_John wrote:Accused:

supermokey7
supermokey6

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 16128857
Game 16128874
Game 16128886
Game 14884971
Game 14884947

I joined a game with supermokey7 and was looking at his other games and noticed he was in a game with supermokey6 and was watching it and supermokey7 was just deploying in one spot and not attacking and letting supermokey6 win the game Game 16128857. and they have set up more games after this one and I am sure the game I joined threw that off on this game. If you could take a look at this that would be great.

Lower links corrected - it is mokey, not monkey.
Not only a multi, but not a very good one - still a cadet despite giving himself points

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 7:57 am**

- Looks to be supermonkey6 is the dominant chimp, There is enough here for Mods to look at, shouldn't take long to determine.

- Tank Squad has done their duty ")

\MGM/ ♎

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 8:06 am**

clangfield wrote:
BIG_John wrote:Accused:

supermokey7
supermokey6

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis

Game number(s):

Game 16128857
Game 16128874
Game 16128886
Game 14884971
Game 14884947

I joined a game with supermokey7 and was looking at his other games and noticed he was in a game with supermokey6 and was watching it and supermokey7 was just deploying in one spot and not attacking and letting supermokey6 win the game Game 16128857. and they have set up more games after this one and I am sure the game I joined threw that off on this game. If you could take a look at this that would be great.

Lower links corrected - it is mokey, not monkey.
Not only a multi, but not a very good one - still a cadet despite giving himself points

- Good eye Clang! First glance looks like a monkey?

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:29 am**

Thanks clangfield for the correction bud! I figured this was an easy one lol! The one game he actually attacks three or four spots and then stops and supermokey6 finishes it off.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 1:37 pm**

i REFUSE to believe that anyone with such a DOPE username, is a multi!!! RE-FUSE!!!-Jésus noir

supermonkey7's theme song!!!

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 2:48 pm**

owenshooter wrote:i REFUSE to believe that anyone with such a DOPE username, is a multi!!! RE-FUSE!!!-Jésus noir

supermonkey7's theme song!!!

- Was waiting for this OS!! Haa!!

- I know Clang pointed out its supermokey not monkey,,But I'm all in to say when the dude made that username he meant monkey, maybe the room was super smokey ? ")

\MGM/ Stalliano noir

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 3:10 pm**

maybe he and all his siblings are multis, but i just don't care!! leave the monkey alone!!!-Jésus noir

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 7:18 pm**

There is also the possibility that they could be siblings or family. There is not enough evidence for now but I have placed a block on them to prevent them from playing together again. This is something to keep an eye on.

Posted: **Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:23 pm**

LOL!!!! So I take it that you don't get busted for point dumping anymore and you are going to tell me two different people are going to use the same name with a different number at the end! You got to be fking joking. Guess it takes to much work to bust someone.

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 4:58 am**

BIG_John wrote:LOL!!!! So I take it that you don't get busted for point dumping anymore and you are going to tell me two different people are going to use the same name with a different number at the end! You got to be fking joking. Guess it takes to much work to bust someone.

- Easy there big fella, They are under surveillance, and they can't play together for now, If they can't play together and they are one person then that person won't last long here. I contacted supermonkey6 and asked him/her to come here and explain this monkey business.

\MGM/♎

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:15 am**

wait!!! this video was not what i was expecting... then i hit the :30 mark and died...
EVEN THESE GUYS KNOW TO USE RANDOM.ORG!!! BA HA HA!!! and long live the SUPERMONKEY!!!-Jésus noir

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 1:42 pm**

BIG_John wrote:LOL!!!! So I take it that you don't get busted for point dumping anymore and you are going to tell me two different people are going to use the same name with a different number at the end! You got to be fking joking. Guess it takes to much work to bust someone.

Or, the evidence does not point to them being multi's. I know it's hard to believe, but it's very possible. I guess I should assume anyone with similar names are multi's. :-s

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:07 pm**

MagnusGreeol wrote:
BIG_John wrote:LOL!!!! So I take it that you don't get busted for point dumping anymore and you are going to tell me two different people are going to use the same name with a different number at the end! You got to be fking joking. Guess it takes to much work to bust someone.

- Easy there big fella, They are under surveillance, and they can't play together for now, If they can't play together and they are one person then that person won't last long here. I contacted supermonkey6 and asked him/her to come here and explain this monkey business.

\MGM/♎[/quote

He won't do that! I think he knows what he is doing is wrong and knows this is here. He has been online and has not taken his turn anymore in my game. I just can figure out if it is two different freaking people then why is one playing and the other one not playing! Supermoky6 was a cook when he started doing this when I noticed this but I guess I am the only dumbass on here that can see that. It is what it is but when I see someone get in trouble for playing a guy that is point dumping and it is a big deal and this guy doing the same thing and probably the same person and they let him get away with it! Maybe it is one of there family members so it is ok for them to do it but nobody else.

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:14 pm**

TheForgivenOne wrote:
BIG_John wrote:LOL!!!! So I take it that you don't get busted for point dumping anymore and you are going to tell me two different people are going to use the same name with a different number at the end! You got to be fking joking. Guess it takes to much work to bust someone.

Or, the evidence does not point to them being multi's. I know it's hard to believe, but it's very possible. I guess I should assume anyone with similar names are multi's. :-s

Then explain when the one logs in then the other logs in shortly after that they play 1 vs 1 a few times the one plays the other one for the most part just sits there and deploys in one damn spot? Then when the one logs off then the other one shortly after that. But I guess I am the only one that things something is not right with this. I am starting to see why all my friends quit being volunteers for the site and why everyone has left the site.

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:54 pm**

BIG_John wrote:
TheForgivenOne wrote:
BIG_John wrote:LOL!!!! So I take it that you don't get busted for point dumping anymore and you are going to tell me two different people are going to use the same name with a different number at the end! You got to be fking joking. Guess it takes to much work to bust someone.

Or, the evidence does not point to them being multi's. I know it's hard to believe, but it's very possible. I guess I should assume anyone with similar names are multi's.

Then explain when the one logs in then the other logs in shortly after that they play 1 vs 1 a few times the one plays the other one for the most part just sits there and deploys in one damn spot? Then when the one logs off then the other one shortly after that. But I guess I am the only one that things something is not right with this. I am starting to see why all my friends quit being volunteers for the site and why everyone has left the site.

There's also cases like this:

2015-11-20 12:55:21 - supermokey6 ended the turn
2015-11-20 20:10:04 - supermokey7 began deploying initial troops

Why wait 8 hours to switch accounts to start deploying troops?

95% of the multi's I found, when they played each other 1 on 1, don't do that. They would switch IMMEDIATELY. Not wait 8 hours, or even 20 minutes. They'd finish the game off in a day. Not wait 2, 3, 5 days to finish a game.

King Achilles has a LOT more tools at his disposal then you do, and he OBVIOUSLY see's something that is telling him this isn't a clear cut case of multi's. He obviously has his suspicions and has put a block on them. From when I was a hunter, we weren't busting people unless we were certain.

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 4:40 pm**

That had to be their last game they joined together because when I reported this they were taking turns back to back because I sat here and watched it! The last game they started they didn't start until after this was posted so he is probably trying to hide it now. Even if it is two different people then you are saying it is ok for one to not deploy in one spot and not attack and let the other person win the game. If that is the case then I am going to set up another account so I can gain points that way as well. Thought that was against the rules as well but looks like that is ok or get my buddy to set up an account and play me and tell him not to attack and let me win so I can get the points. I will jump all on that then!

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:04 pm**

BIG_John wrote:That had to be their last game they joined together because when I reported this they were taking turns back to back because I sat here and watched it! The last game they started they didn't start until after this was posted so he is probably trying to hide it now. Even if it is two different people then you are saying it is ok for one to not deploy in one spot and not attack and let the other person win the game. If that is the case then I am going to set up another account so I can gain points that way as well. Thought that was against the rules as well but looks like that is ok or get my buddy to set up an account and play me and tell him not to attack and let me win so I can get the points. I will jump all on that then!

- You won't do no such thing Mister! You know why?! Cuz your not a cheater!! These two monkeys are on double secret probation and are now under a magify glass, they can't even shit back to back without a multi hunter up their azz. He/her/they/ are being monitored. I sent a polite message to monkey6 to come here and shed light, We will see.

\MGM/♎

Ps- OS got any Superfly clips?

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:15 pm**

MagnusGreeol wrote:
BIG_John wrote:That had to be their last game they joined together because when I reported this they were taking turns back to back because I sat here and watched it! The last game they started they didn't start until after this was posted so he is probably trying to hide it now. Even if it is two different people then you are saying it is ok for one to not deploy in one spot and not attack and let the other person win the game. If that is the case then I am going to set up another account so I can gain points that way as well. Thought that was against the rules as well but looks like that is ok or get my buddy to set up an account and play me and tell him not to attack and let me win so I can get the points. I will jump all on that then!

- You won't do no such thing Mister! You know why?! Cuz your not a cheater!! These two monkeys are on double secret probation and are now under a magify glass, they can't even shit back to back without a multi hunter up their azz. He/her/they/ are being monitored. I sent a polite message to monkey6 to come here and shed light, We will see.

\MGM/♎

Ps- OS got any Superfly clips?

LOL! You called my bluff but I am not understanding why they are not getting in trouble for giving up points to the other player if it is two different players. We had a couple of guys in our clan that got in trouble for joining games of a guy that set up a bunch of games and never took turns. The only difference in these the one supposed player took his turn just never attacked and always lost which seems to be the same thing to me.

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 5:26 pm**

BIG_John wrote:
MagnusGreeol wrote:
BIG_John wrote:That had to be their last game they joined together because when I reported this they were taking turns back to back because I sat here and watched it! The last game they started they didn't start until after this was posted so he is probably trying to hide it now. Even if it is two different people then you are saying it is ok for one to not deploy in one spot and not attack and let the other person win the game. If that is the case then I am going to set up another account so I can gain points that way as well. Thought that was against the rules as well but looks like that is ok or get my buddy to set up an account and play me and tell him not to attack and let me win so I can get the points. I will jump all on that then!

- You won't do no such thing Mister! You know why?! Cuz your not a cheater!! These two monkeys are on double secret probation and are now under a magify glass, they can't even shit back to back without a multi hunter up their azz. He/her/they/ are being monitored. I sent a polite message to monkey6 to come here and shed light, We will see.

\MGM/♎

Ps- OS got any Superfly clips?

LOL! You called my bluff but I am not understanding why they are not getting in trouble for giving up points to the other player if it is two different players. We had a couple of guys in our clan that got in trouble for joining games of a guy that set up a bunch of games and never took turns. The only difference in these the one supposed player took his turn just never attacked and always lost which seems to be the same thing to me.

That is the standard result that comes from "SD" Or whatever you want a call it. They get a Warning (I'm not 100% certain if they did, but i'm assuming they did) and they got blocked from playing each other.

If you think SD should get harder punishments for first time offences, bring it up in Suggestions.

Posted: **Sat Nov 21, 2015 6:02 pm**

BIG_John wrote:
MagnusGreeol wrote:
BIG_John wrote:That had to be their last game they joined together because when I reported this they were taking turns back to back because I sat here and watched it! The last game they started they didn't start until after this was posted so he is probably trying to hide it now. Even if it is two different people then you are saying it is ok for one to not deploy in one spot and not attack and let the other person win the game. If that is the case then I am going to set up another account so I can gain points that way as well. Thought that was against the rules as well but looks like that is ok or get my buddy to set up an account and play me and tell him not to attack and let me win so I can get the points. I will jump all on that then!

- You won't do no such thing Mister! You know why?! Cuz your not a cheater!! These two monkeys are on double secret probation and are now under a magify glass, they can't even shit back to back without a multi hunter up their azz. He/her/they/ are being monitored. I sent a polite message to monkey6 to come here and shed light, We will see.

\MGM/♎

Ps- OS got any Superfly clips?

LOL! You called my bluff but I am not understanding why they are not getting in trouble for giving up points to the other player if it is two different players. We had a couple of guys in our clan that got in trouble for joining games of a guy that set up a bunch of games and never took turns. The only difference in these the one supposed player took his turn just never attacked and always lost which seems to be the same thing to me.

- Big John - Take pride knowing how and who you are and the people you suround yourself with. You are on duty as a legit CC Member looking out for the rest of Us, as I am for you. Cheats must cower in the face of so many who are on the look out for suspicious activity. Salute Big J! ")

\MGM/ ♎

Posted: **Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:36 am**

hey guys, sorry for being a jackass. supermokey7 is my alt
I didn't actually read the rules at all :oops:

, but I'll stop it now
I was just trying to fix my horrible win/loss ratio (17% lol =D>

)

cool forum topic btw, I was surprised that people are actually willing to do research on and discuss random things like this
Thanks big_john for catching my mistake, and thanks owenshooter for believing in me lol

So I'd just like to say I'm sorry (i am Canadian, before you ask), and i'll try to play more honestly from now on

Posted: **Sun Nov 22, 2015 4:39 am**

supermokey6 wrote:hey guys, sorry for being a jackass. supermokey7 is my alt
I didn't actually read the rules at all , but I'll stop it now
I was just trying to fix my horrible win/loss ratio (17% lol )

cool forum topic btw, I was surprised that people are actually willing to do research on and discuss random things like this
Thanks big_john for catching my mistake, and thanks owenshooter for believing in me lol

So I'd just like to say I'm sorry (i am Canadian, before you ask), and i'll try to play more honestly from now on

Rofl quoted before deleted.

Posted: **Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:13 am**

supermokey6 wrote:hey guys, sorry for being a jackass. supermokey7 is my alt
I didn't actually read the rules at all , but I'll stop it now
I was just trying to fix my horrible win/loss ratio (17% lol )

cool forum topic btw, I was surprised that people are actually willing to do research on and discuss random things like this
Thanks big_john for catching my mistake, and thanks owenshooter for believing in me lol

So I'd just like to say I'm sorry (i am Canadian, before you ask), and i'll try to play more honestly from now on

I guess this counts as evidence... good call owen... #-o

Conquer Club

Supermokey7 [ka]

Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermonkey7

Re: Supermonkey7

Re: Supermonkey7

Re: Supermonkey7

Re: Supermokey7

Re: Supermokey7

Re: Supermokey7

Re: Supermokey7

Re: Supermokey7

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]

Re: Supermokey7 [ka]