Conquer Club

Accused:

DP_Danno

The accused are suspected of:

violating fog
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

DP_Danno violated fog and engaged in Secret diplomacy with Hug It Out in game linked below:


Game number(s):

Game 16103735

Comments:

DP_Danno violated fog by revealing to another player the location and number of my remaining troops

DP_Danno focussed all his efforts in attacking me and when unsuccessful in my elimination, he declared in public chat the location and number of my troops to assist another player in my elimination.

https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=16103735

Not against the rules I'm afraid - revealing in fog is a tactic, also sometimes used for misdirecting. Annoying but not illegal. Add him to your foe list.
Also, declaring in chat means it's not secret

Not against the rules. However, people will be less likely to do this stuff to you if you don't behave like an asshole.

guido74 wrote:Accused:

DP_Danno

The accused are suspected of: violating fog

Please find and post this alleged "fog rule". i am unable to locate it anywhere within the rules. as soon as you post this "fog rule" that the accused has violated, i will agree with you 100%. until then, please refrain from posting absolute garbage claims in the C&A... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

Just make it a point to not allow a fog revealer to win. It's not against the rules but it's bush league.

clangfield wrote:Not against the rules I'm afraid - revealing in fog is a tactic, also sometimes used for misdirecting. Annoying but not illegal. Add him to your foe list.
Also, declaring in chat means it's not secret

^ This is spot on.

rockfist wrote:Just make it a point to not allow a fog revealer to win. It's not against the rules but it's bush league.

go make a suggestion, will never happen... good luck with that...-Jésus noir

rockfist wrote:Just make it a point to not allow a fog revealer to win. It's not against the rules but it's bush league.

I blame the people that are stupid enough to counter in a similar manner, instead of getting outraged and thereby proving what "the revealer" says is true.